Research Article

Exploring Conflict Theories in the Context of Urban Security

Volume: 5 Number: 2 December 31, 2023
TR EN

Exploring Conflict Theories in the Context of Urban Security

Abstract

Until today, urban security has been studied from various theoretical perspectives, indicating its cruciality and complexity. However, there is a gap in understanding how conflict theories relate to urban security, particularly how structural injustice and inequalities shape its outcome and determine its consequences. This study explores the significance of conflict theories and how they contribute to understanding the complex issue of urban security. Using conflict theories, this study focuses on the role of power, gender inequalities, and capitalist structures in determining and shaping social structures and relations. According to the study, traditional approaches related to urban security have become insufficient. Hence, conflict theories propose alternative solutions that can provide a more thorough understanding of urban security issues. The study’s contribution to the literature is its thorough examination and analysis of different conflict theories and how they relate to urban security, shedding light on the complex interplay and interaction of race, inequality, discourse, power, and colonialism in shaping urban security outcomes. This study opens the door to empirical, comparative, and interdisciplinary studies that will contribute to conflict theories on urban security. In addition, it emphasizes the importance of analyzing governance structures, institutions, and longitudinal data to establish effective interventions and policies in urban security.

Keywords

References

  1. Abraham, S. (2008). What Does Mumbai Have to Do with Rome? Postcolonial Perspectives on Globalization and Theology. Theological Studies, 69(2), 376–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/004056390806900208
  2. Adeniyi Ogunyankin, G. (2019a). Postcolonial Approaches to the Study of African Politics. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.830
  3. Allan, J. V., Kenway, S. J., & Head, B. W. (2021). Urban water security priorities – an Australian industry perspective. Water Supply, 21(2), 710–722. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2020.348
  4. Allan, J., Kenway, S., & Head, B. (2018). Urban water security - what does it mean?. Urban Water Journal, 15(9), 899-910. https://doi.org/10.1080/1573062x.2019.1574843
  5. Benna, U., & Benna, I. (2018). Revisiting Urban Theories. In E-Planning and Collaboration (pp. 279–300). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5646-6.ch013
  6. Bernstein, J. M. (2017). Horkheimer, Max (1895–1973). In Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780415249126-N073-1
  7. Bohm, r. M. (1982). Radical criminology: an explication. Criminology, 19(4), 565–589. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.1982.tb00439.x
  8. Busbridge, R. (2021). Postcolonial Political Theory. In Political Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780199756223-0334

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Public Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 31, 2023

Submission Date

July 9, 2023

Acceptance Date

December 1, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 5 Number: 2

APA
Jimale, O. A., & Sipahi, E. B. (2023). Exploring Conflict Theories in the Context of Urban Security. Necmettin Erbakan Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 165-185. https://izlik.org/JA25HF45UP

Journal of Necmettin Erbakan University Faculty of Political Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).