CHINA’S BRI: FROM GEO-POLITICS TO GEO-ECONOMICS
Year 2021,
Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 115 - 130, 30.12.2021
Zill-e-huma Mustafa Malik
Abstract
This work is a contribution to the studies of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) as indicative of China’s new geoeconomic strategy. It analyses the relationship between Pakistan and China, as expressed in China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as illustrative of this new economic strategy. This paper explains and focuses on how China’s geo-economic strategy operates in parallel with geo-politics through the regional incorporation and cooperation among neighboring states in the form of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC),and Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). The paper also seeks to understand Pakistan’s rationale for participating in these Chinese initiatives. In addition, how they shape wider Pakistan-China relations. In this research, author attempted to study geo-economics made of condense geographic, political and economic dynamics.
Supporting Institution
Shanghai University
Project Number
PhD Degree
Thanks
I am grateful for the expertise and assistance of my Supervisor, Professor Anthony G. McGrew, who facilitated my learning and guided me through the research and writing process.
References
- Blackwill, Robert .D., Harris, Jennifer.M. (2016). War by Other means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Gaiduchok, Oksana. (2019). Geoeconomic strategies in the modern global economic space. Eureka Social and Humanities (6). https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2019.001081
- Huntington, S. P. (1993). Why International primacy matters. International Security, 17 (4), 68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539022
- Hamid, N., & Hayat, S. (2012). The opportunities and pitfalls of Pakistan’s trade with China and other Neighbors. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 17, 271–292.
- Jaeger Bruna, C. & Brites Pedro, V.P.(2020). Geoeconomics in the light of international political
- Economy: A theoretical discussion. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy,40(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572020-2982
- Khan, U. A.(2014). Gwadar could be the key to Pakistan’s economic turnaround. http://www.irs.org.pk/reports/Report_012114.pdf.
- Khetran, Mir.S. (2019). SCO Membership and Pakistan: Prospects of relations with Central Asia. Strategic Studies, 39( 2) ,83-95.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/48544301
- Klaus, Solberg.S. (2012). Geoeconomics. ISBN-13: 9788740301281.
- Kurecic, Petar. (2015). Geoeconomic and Geopolitical conflicts: Outcomes of the Geopolitical Economy in a contemporary world. World Review of Political Economy, 6(4), 522-543. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.6.4.0522
- Luttwak, E. (1990). From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce, Geopolitics Reader, 126.
- Munoz, M.J. (edt). (2017). Advances in Geoeconomics. ISBN: 978-1-31531-213-2.
- Pu, Xiaoyu. (2017). One Belt, One Road: Visions and Challenges of China’s Geoeconomic Strategy. 中國大陸研究 第 59 卷 第 3 期 民國 105 年 9 月.
- Rehman, Muhammad. S. (2014). Significance of Shanghai Cooperation Organization-Pakistan’s Perspective. Margalla Papers, 67-79.
- Scekic R., Draskovic M., Delibasic M. (2016). Neoliberalism in geoeconomics: The case of Southeast Europe. Journal of International Studies, 9 (1), 66-75.
https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/5
- Scott, George.B. (2019). How effective is the SCO as a tool for Chinese Foreign Policy. (2). ISSN 2053-8626 https://www.e-ir.info/2019/02/26/how-effective-is-the-sco-as-a-tool-for-chinese-foreign-policy/
- Stutte, Patricia.C. (2017).The revenge of geopolitics: The space as a metaphor of fear in the clash of civilizations, Soft power, 5 (1), 109.
https://doi.org/1017450/170106
- Zhengbing, Wang. (2019). A new era of economic globalization: An opinion on opportunities, and risk and challenges of one Belt one Road. International Journal of Research in Commerce, Economics & Management, 9(6), 1-6, ISSN 2231-4245.
Çin'in BRI Projesi: Jeopolitikten Jeoekonomiye
Year 2021,
Volume: 3 Issue: 2, 115 - 130, 30.12.2021
Zill-e-huma Mustafa Malik
Abstract
Bu çalışma, Çin’in yeni jeoekonomik stratejisinin göstergesi olarak Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi çalışmalarına bir katkıdır. Bu yeni ekonomik stratejinin bir örneği olarak Çin Pakistan Ekonomik Koridoru'nda ifade edildiği gibi Pakistan ve Çin arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz ediyor. Bu makale, Çin'in jeo-ekonomik stratejisinin, Kuşak ve Yol Girişimi (BRI), Çin Pakistan Ekonomik Koridoru (CPEC) ve Şanghay İşbirliği Örgütü (SCO) biçiminde komşu devletler arasında bölgesel birleşme ve işbirliği yoluyla jeo-politikayla paralel olarak nasıl işlediğini açıklıyor ve bunlara odaklanıyor. Gazete ayrıca Pakistan'ın bu Çin girişimlerine katılma gerekçesini anlamaya çalışıyor. Ek olarak, Pakistan-Çin ilişkilerini nasıl şekillendiriyorlar. Bu araştırmada yazar, yoğun coğrafi, politik ve ekonomik dinamiklerden oluşan jeo-ekonomiyi incelemeye çalıştı.
Project Number
PhD Degree
References
- Blackwill, Robert .D., Harris, Jennifer.M. (2016). War by Other means: Geoeconomics and Statecraft. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Gaiduchok, Oksana. (2019). Geoeconomic strategies in the modern global economic space. Eureka Social and Humanities (6). https://doi.org/10.21303/2504-5571.2019.001081
- Huntington, S. P. (1993). Why International primacy matters. International Security, 17 (4), 68. https://doi.org/10.2307/2539022
- Hamid, N., & Hayat, S. (2012). The opportunities and pitfalls of Pakistan’s trade with China and other Neighbors. The Lahore Journal of Economics, 17, 271–292.
- Jaeger Bruna, C. & Brites Pedro, V.P.(2020). Geoeconomics in the light of international political
- Economy: A theoretical discussion. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy,40(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572020-2982
- Khan, U. A.(2014). Gwadar could be the key to Pakistan’s economic turnaround. http://www.irs.org.pk/reports/Report_012114.pdf.
- Khetran, Mir.S. (2019). SCO Membership and Pakistan: Prospects of relations with Central Asia. Strategic Studies, 39( 2) ,83-95.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/48544301
- Klaus, Solberg.S. (2012). Geoeconomics. ISBN-13: 9788740301281.
- Kurecic, Petar. (2015). Geoeconomic and Geopolitical conflicts: Outcomes of the Geopolitical Economy in a contemporary world. World Review of Political Economy, 6(4), 522-543. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.13169/worlrevipoliecon.6.4.0522
- Luttwak, E. (1990). From Geopolitics to Geoeconomics: Logic of Conflict, Grammar of Commerce, Geopolitics Reader, 126.
- Munoz, M.J. (edt). (2017). Advances in Geoeconomics. ISBN: 978-1-31531-213-2.
- Pu, Xiaoyu. (2017). One Belt, One Road: Visions and Challenges of China’s Geoeconomic Strategy. 中國大陸研究 第 59 卷 第 3 期 民國 105 年 9 月.
- Rehman, Muhammad. S. (2014). Significance of Shanghai Cooperation Organization-Pakistan’s Perspective. Margalla Papers, 67-79.
- Scekic R., Draskovic M., Delibasic M. (2016). Neoliberalism in geoeconomics: The case of Southeast Europe. Journal of International Studies, 9 (1), 66-75.
https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2016/9-1/5
- Scott, George.B. (2019). How effective is the SCO as a tool for Chinese Foreign Policy. (2). ISSN 2053-8626 https://www.e-ir.info/2019/02/26/how-effective-is-the-sco-as-a-tool-for-chinese-foreign-policy/
- Stutte, Patricia.C. (2017).The revenge of geopolitics: The space as a metaphor of fear in the clash of civilizations, Soft power, 5 (1), 109.
https://doi.org/1017450/170106
- Zhengbing, Wang. (2019). A new era of economic globalization: An opinion on opportunities, and risk and challenges of one Belt one Road. International Journal of Research in Commerce, Economics & Management, 9(6), 1-6, ISSN 2231-4245.