Year 2025,
Volume: 20 Issue: 3, 149 - 158, 20.10.2025
Ramazan Uğur
,
Emin Taha Keskin
,
Turan Özdemir
,
Ahmet Eren Sağir
,
Direnç Özbörü
,
Abdullah Zilan
,
Abdülmüttalip Şimşek
References
-
1. Hsu L, Li H, Pucheril D, Hansen M, Littleton R, Peabody J, et al. Use of percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stenting in management of ureteral obstruction. World J Nephrol. 2016 Mar 6;5(2):172–81. https://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v5.i2.172
-
2. European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis - Uroweb [Internet]. [cited 2024 Dec 30]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis
-
3. Szvalb AD, Marten C, Cain K, Taylor JS, Huang SY, Jiang Y, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy catheter-related infections in patients with gynaecological cancers: a multidisciplinary algorithmic approach. J Hosp Infect. 2023 Nov;141:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhin.2023.09.002
-
4. Wang CJ, Hsu CS, Chen HW, Chang CH, Tsai PC. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis. 2016 Oct;44(5):415–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240- 015-0852-z
-
5. Desai R, Batura D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and treatment choices in emphysematous pyelonephritis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Apr;54(4):717– 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-03006-8
-
6. Siddiq DM, Darouiche RO. Infectious complications associated with percutaneous nephrostomy catheters: do we know enough? Int J Artif Organs. 2012 Oct;35(10):898–907. https://doi.org/10.5301/ ijao.5000141
-
7. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, et al. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161– 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
-
8. Ohno Y. Role of systemic inflammatory response markers in urological malignancy. Int J Urol. 2019 Jan;26(1):31–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13834
-
9. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
-
10. Leone M, Nielsen ND, Russell L. Ten tips on sepsisinduced thrombocytopenia. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jul 1;50(7):1157–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134- 024-07339-9
-
11. Gotts JE, Matthay MA. Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management. BMJ. 2016 May 23;353:i1585. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1585
-
12. Cecconi M, Evans L, Levy M, Rhodes A. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30696-2
-
13. Finfer S, Venkatesh B, Hotchkiss RS, Sasson SC. Lymphopenia in sepsis-an acquired immunodeficiency? Immunol Cell Biol. 2023 Jul;101(6):535–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/imcb.12674
-
14. Wang Z, Zhang W, Chen L, Lu X, Tu Y. Lymphopenia in sepsis: a narrative review. Crit Care. 2024 Sep 20;28(1):315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04986-w
-
15. Jin S, Yin JB, Li W, Zang LL. Effect of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on prognosis of elderly patients with severe sepsis combined with diabetes mellitus. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04433-7
-
16. Gutiérrez-Zárate D, Rosas-Sánchez K, Zaragoza JJ. Clinical evaluation of peripheral tissue perfusion as a predictor of mortality in sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023 Dec;47(12):697–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2023.05.003
-
17. Liu J, Jiang Y, Huang H, Zhu Z, Chen J, Liu D, et al. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics, Radiological Predictors, Pathological Features, and Perioperative Outcomes Associated with Perinephric Fat Adhesion Degree. J Oncol. 2021;2021:9095469. https://doi. org/10.1155/2021/9095469
-
18. Chen WA, Huang HS, Lu ZH, Liu CJ. The Mayo adhesive probability score predicts post-op fever and intraoperative hemorrhage in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2023 Sep;41(9):2503–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04502-2
-
19. Hsieh TY, Chang SJ, Chueh JSC, Lee YJ. The mayo adhesive probability score predicts post-op fever and sepsis in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urolithiasis. 2024 May 31;52(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024- 01539-3
-
20. Martin L, Rouviere O, Bezza R, Bailleux J, Abbas F, Schott-Pethelaz AM, et al. Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Is an Independent Computed Tomography Scan Predictor of Adherent Perinephric Fat in Open Partial Nephrectomy. Urology. 2017 May;103:124–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.050
-
21. Gao T, Nong Z, Luo Y, Mo M, Chen Z, Yang Z, et al. Machine learning-based prediction of in-hospital mortality for critically ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury. Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(1):2316267. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2316267
-
22. Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M, McGloughlin S, MacIsaac C, Bellomo R, et al. Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290–300. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2016.20328
-
23. Jiang L, Cheng M. Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes of patients with sepsis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Mar 5;14(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00815-4
-
24. Pari B, Gallucci M, Ghigo A, Brizzi MF. Insight on Infections in Diabetic Setting. Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 21;11(3):971. https://doi.org/10.3390/ biomedicines11030971
-
25. Nagata I, Abe T, Ogura H, Kushimoto S, Fujishima S, Gando S, et al. Intensive care unit model and inhospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: A secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 28;100(21):e26132. https://doi.org/10.1097/ MD.0000000000026132
Nephrostomy-Associated Sepsis in Cancer Patients: What Are the Risk Factors? A Retrospective Cohort Study
Year 2025,
Volume: 20 Issue: 3, 149 - 158, 20.10.2025
Ramazan Uğur
,
Emin Taha Keskin
,
Turan Özdemir
,
Ahmet Eren Sağir
,
Direnç Özbörü
,
Abdullah Zilan
,
Abdülmüttalip Şimşek
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate sepsis and mortality following nephrostomy tube due to malignant etiology.
Material and Methods: Patients who underwent nephrostomy tube at our center were retrospectively evaluated. Only those with malignancy-related indications were included in the study. Patients were initially categorized into two main groups: those with urological malignancies and those with non-urological malignancies. Subsequently, they were further divided into subgroups based on the development of sepsis and survival status. Predictive factors associated with sepsis and mortality were analyzed.
Results: A total of 517 patients were identified, of whom 173 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 62.53 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 112:61. Among patients who developed sepsis, post-operative (post-op) platelet counts, post-op creatinine, as well as pre-operative (pre-op) and post-op neutrophil and lymphocyte counts and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significantly lower, whereas procalcitonin and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were significantly higher (p<0.05). The presence of perirenal fat stranding and intensive care unit (ICU) admission were also significantly associated with sepsis development(p<0.05). Regarding mortality, lower pre-op and post-op lymphocyte counts and higher procalcitonin levels were statistically significant (p <0.05). Postoperative NLR, creatinine and CRP were also significantly associated with mortality. Furthermore, the presence of diabetes mellitus (DM), immunosuppressive drug use (ISDU), ICU admission, and non-urological malignancies were found to be statistically significant factors associated with mortality.
Conclusion: Our findings indicate that NLR, procalcitonin, CRP, as well as pre-and post-op platelet, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts, along with the presence of perirenal fat stranding, DM, ISDU, and ICU admission and non-urological malignancies play significant roles in the development of sepsis and mortality. These findings emphasize the importance of early risk stratification and targeted management in patients undergoing nephrostomy for malignant obstruction.
Ethical Statement
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Başakşehir Çam and City Hospital (Approval No: 2023-183)
Supporting Institution
The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.
References
-
1. Hsu L, Li H, Pucheril D, Hansen M, Littleton R, Peabody J, et al. Use of percutaneous nephrostomy and ureteral stenting in management of ureteral obstruction. World J Nephrol. 2016 Mar 6;5(2):172–81. https://doi.org/10.5527/wjn.v5.i2.172
-
2. European Association of Urology. EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis - Uroweb [Internet]. [cited 2024 Dec 30]. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guidelines/urolithiasis
-
3. Szvalb AD, Marten C, Cain K, Taylor JS, Huang SY, Jiang Y, et al. Percutaneous nephrostomy catheter-related infections in patients with gynaecological cancers: a multidisciplinary algorithmic approach. J Hosp Infect. 2023 Nov;141:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jhin.2023.09.002
-
4. Wang CJ, Hsu CS, Chen HW, Chang CH, Tsai PC. Percutaneous nephrostomy versus ureteroscopic management of sepsis associated with ureteral stone impaction: a randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis. 2016 Oct;44(5):415–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240- 015-0852-z
-
5. Desai R, Batura D. A systematic review and meta-analysis of risk factors and treatment choices in emphysematous pyelonephritis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022 Apr;54(4):717– 36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-021-03006-8
-
6. Siddiq DM, Darouiche RO. Infectious complications associated with percutaneous nephrostomy catheters: do we know enough? Int J Artif Organs. 2012 Oct;35(10):898–907. https://doi.org/10.5301/ ijao.5000141
-
7. Assimos D, Krambeck A, Miller NL, Monga M, Murad MH, Nelson CP, et al. Surgical Management of Stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline, PART II. J Urol. 2016 Oct;196(4):1161– 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.05.090
-
8. Ohno Y. Role of systemic inflammatory response markers in urological malignancy. Int J Urol. 2019 Jan;26(1):31–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.13834
-
9. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, Shankar-Hari M, Annane D, Bauer M, et al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
-
10. Leone M, Nielsen ND, Russell L. Ten tips on sepsisinduced thrombocytopenia. Intensive Care Med. 2024 Jul 1;50(7):1157–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134- 024-07339-9
-
11. Gotts JE, Matthay MA. Sepsis: pathophysiology and clinical management. BMJ. 2016 May 23;353:i1585. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i1585
-
12. Cecconi M, Evans L, Levy M, Rhodes A. Sepsis and septic shock. Lancet. 2018 Jul 7;392(10141):75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30696-2
-
13. Finfer S, Venkatesh B, Hotchkiss RS, Sasson SC. Lymphopenia in sepsis-an acquired immunodeficiency? Immunol Cell Biol. 2023 Jul;101(6):535–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/imcb.12674
-
14. Wang Z, Zhang W, Chen L, Lu X, Tu Y. Lymphopenia in sepsis: a narrative review. Crit Care. 2024 Sep 20;28(1):315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04986-w
-
15. Jin S, Yin JB, Li W, Zang LL. Effect of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio on prognosis of elderly patients with severe sepsis combined with diabetes mellitus. BMC Geriatr. 2024 Feb 29;24(1):211. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04433-7
-
16. Gutiérrez-Zárate D, Rosas-Sánchez K, Zaragoza JJ. Clinical evaluation of peripheral tissue perfusion as a predictor of mortality in sepsis and septic shock in the intensive care unit: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2023 Dec;47(12):697–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2023.05.003
-
17. Liu J, Jiang Y, Huang H, Zhu Z, Chen J, Liu D, et al. Analysis of Clinical Characteristics, Radiological Predictors, Pathological Features, and Perioperative Outcomes Associated with Perinephric Fat Adhesion Degree. J Oncol. 2021;2021:9095469. https://doi. org/10.1155/2021/9095469
-
18. Chen WA, Huang HS, Lu ZH, Liu CJ. The Mayo adhesive probability score predicts post-op fever and intraoperative hemorrhage in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol. 2023 Sep;41(9):2503–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04502-2
-
19. Hsieh TY, Chang SJ, Chueh JSC, Lee YJ. The mayo adhesive probability score predicts post-op fever and sepsis in retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urolithiasis. 2024 May 31;52(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024- 01539-3
-
20. Martin L, Rouviere O, Bezza R, Bailleux J, Abbas F, Schott-Pethelaz AM, et al. Mayo Adhesive Probability Score Is an Independent Computed Tomography Scan Predictor of Adherent Perinephric Fat in Open Partial Nephrectomy. Urology. 2017 May;103:124–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.050
-
21. Gao T, Nong Z, Luo Y, Mo M, Chen Z, Yang Z, et al. Machine learning-based prediction of in-hospital mortality for critically ill patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury. Ren Fail. 2024 Dec;46(1):2316267. https://doi.org/10.1080/0886022X.2024.2316267
-
22. Raith EP, Udy AA, Bailey M, McGloughlin S, MacIsaac C, Bellomo R, et al. Prognostic Accuracy of the SOFA Score, SIRS Criteria, and qSOFA Score for In-Hospital Mortality Among Adults With Suspected Infection Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit. JAMA. 2017 Jan 17;317(3):290–300. https://doi.org/10.1001/ jama.2016.20328
-
23. Jiang L, Cheng M. Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes of patients with sepsis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetol Metab Syndr. 2022 Mar 5;14(1):39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13098-022-00815-4
-
24. Pari B, Gallucci M, Ghigo A, Brizzi MF. Insight on Infections in Diabetic Setting. Biomedicines. 2023 Mar 21;11(3):971. https://doi.org/10.3390/ biomedicines11030971
-
25. Nagata I, Abe T, Ogura H, Kushimoto S, Fujishima S, Gando S, et al. Intensive care unit model and inhospital mortality among patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: A secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 28;100(21):e26132. https://doi.org/10.1097/ MD.0000000000026132