Ebeveynlik, kökler ve kimlik: Evlat edinmenin psikodinamik boyutu

Abstract

Bu çalışmada evlat edinme deneyimini ebeveynlik, köken ve kimlik ilişkileri ekseninde psikodinamik bir perspektifle incelenmiştir. Aile, bireyin kimlik gelişimi ve toplumsal aidiyetinin şekillendiği temel kurum olarak ele alınmaktadır. Modern toplumlarda aile biçimlerinin çeşitlenmesiyle birlikte geleneksel biyolojik soybağı temelli aile tanımı genişlemiş, evlat edinme gibi alternatif ebeveynlik uygulamaları önem kazanmıştır. Evlat edinme, hukuki bir düzenleme veya bakım ilişkisi olmakla beraber aidiyet ve bağlanma süreçlerinin yeniden kurgulandığı karmaşık bir psikososyal deneyimdir. Tarihsel olarak soyun devamlılığı, mirasın korunması ve toplumsal dayanışma amacı taşırken modern toplumlarda çocuk refahı ve aile kurma arzusu ön plandadır. Evlat edinilmiş bireyler, biyolojik kökenleri ile sosyal aile deneyimleri arasında denge kurarken karmaşık kimlik anlatıları geliştirmektedir. Kimlik ve aidiyet, aile ilişkileri, toplumsal söylemler ve kültürel normlarla şekillenmektedir. Gizli evlat edinme uygulamaları, kimlik bunalımlarına yol açabilirken açık modeller kimlik gelişimini desteklemektedir. Psikodinamik açıdan süreç, kayıp, bağlanma, güven ve ret dinamikleriyle iç içedir. Destekleyici ebeveynlik, yeni bağlanma ilişkilerinin kurulmasına yardımcı olurken evlat edinen ebeveynler, infertilite deneyimi ve toplumsal normlar bağlamında psikolojik uyum gerektirmektedir. Tüm bunlar ışığında evlat edinmenin, kimlik, aidiyet ve bağlanmanın yeniden şekillendiği çok boyutlu bir olgu olduğu, özellikle modern toplumlarda aile biçimlerinin çeşitlenmesi, açık/gizli evlat edinme pratiklerindeki dönüşüm ve kimlik arayışlarının görünürlük kazanması bağlamında yeniden ele alınmasının gerekliliği ortaya çıkmakta olup bu yönüyle çalışmanın alana katkı sağlayıcı nitelikte olduğu düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• Evlat edinme
• kimlik gelişimi
• aidiyet
• psikodinamik yaklaşım
• bağlanma süreçleri

Parenting, roots, and identity: The psychodynamic dimension of adoption

Abstract

This study examines the experience of adoption from a psychodynamic perspective, focusing on the relationships between parenting, origins, and identity. The family is considered the fundamental institution where an individual’s identity development and sense of social belonging are shaped. With the diversification of family forms in modern societies, the traditional definition of the family based on biological kinship has expanded, and alternative parenting practices such as adoption have gained importance. Adoption is not only a legal arrangement or a caregiving relationship but also a complex psychosocial experience in which processes of belonging and attachment are reconfigured. While historically aimed at ensuring the continuity of lineage, preserving inheritance, and fostering social solidarity, in modern societies the focus is on child welfare and the desire to form a family. Adopted individuals develop complex identity narratives as they balance their biological origins with their social family experiences. Identity and belonging are shaped by family relationships, social discourses, and cultural norms. While closed adoption practices can lead to identity crises, open models support identity development. From a psychodynamic perspective, the process is intertwined with dynamics of loss, attachment, trust, and rejection. Supportive parenting helps establish new attachment relationships, while adoptive parents require psychological adjustment within the context of infertility experiences and social norms. In light of all this, adoption is a multifaceted phenomenon that reshapes identity, belonging and attachment, particularly in modern societies where family structures are diversifying, adoption practices are changing and identity searches are becoming more visible. This makes the study a valuable contribution to the field.

Keywords

• Adoption
• identity development
• sense of belonging
• psychodynamic approach
• attachment processes

References

1. Arace, A., Agostini, P. & Prino, L. E. (2025). Mental models of attachment in adoptive parents and children. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(5), 776. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph22050776
2. Baden, A. L. (2016). “Do you know your real parents?” Adoption microaggressions and adopted individuals. Adoption Quarterly, 19(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926755.2015.1026012
3. Berk, L. E. (2018). Development through the lifespan (7. Bs.). Pearson.
4. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment (2. Bs.). Basic Books.
5. Brodzinsky, D. M. (2011). Children’s understanding of adoption: Developmental and clinical implications. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 42(2), 200–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022415
6. Brodzinsky, D., Gunnar, M. & Palacios, J. (2022). Adoption and trauma: Risks, recovery, and the lived experience of adoption. Child Abuse & Neglect, 130(Pt 2), 105309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2021.105309
7. Carp, E. W. (2014). Adoption in America: Historical perspectives. University of Michigan Pres. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.16238
8. Carsten, J. (2004). After kinship. Cambridge University Pres. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511800382

9. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. Norton.
10. Finch, J. (2007). Displaying families. Sociology, 41(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507072284
11. Giddens, A. (2013). Sociology (7. Bs.). Polity Pres.
12. Grotevant, H. (2007). Openness in adoption: Re-thinking ‘‘family’’ in the U.S. M. Inhorn (Ed.), Reproductive disruptions: Gender, technology, and biopolitics in the new millennium (s. 122–143) içinde. New York: Berghahn
13. Grotevant, H. D. & McRoy, R. G. (1998). Openness in adoption: Exploring family connections. Sage.
14. Grotevant, H. D., McRoy, R. G., Wrobel, G. M. & Ayers-Lopez, S. (2013). Contact between adoptive and birth families: Perspectives from the Minnesota/Texas adoption research project. Child Development Perspectives, 7(3), 193-198. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12039
15. Howe, D. (2006). Developmental attachment psychotherapy with fostered and adopted children. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 11(3), 128-134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3588.2006.00393.x
16. Jenkins, R. (2014). Social identity (4. Bs.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315887104 Lo, A. Y. H., Grotevant, H. D., Baden, A. L. & Hogan, C. M. (2024). Unsettled adoptive identity. Family Proces, 63(3), 1592-1622. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12953
17. Morgan, D. H. J. (2011). Rethinking family practices. Palgrave Macmillan.
18. Neil, E., Beek, M. & Ward, E. (2015). Contact after adoption: A longitudinal study of post-adoption contact arrangements. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(6), 1818-1820. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw035
19. Palacios, J. & Brodzinsky, D. (2010). Review: Adoption research: Trends, topics, outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(3), 270-284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025410362837
20. Pertman, A. (2011). Adoption nation: How the adoption revolution is transforming our families-and America. Harvard Common Pres.
21. Stone, L. (2014). Kinship and gender: An introduction (5. Bs.). Westview Pres.
22. Tajfel, H. & Turner, J. C. (2001). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. M. A. Hogg & D. Abrams (Eds.), Intergroup relations: Essential readings (s. 94-109) içinde. Psychology Pres.
23. Wegar, K. (2000). Adoption, family ideology, and social stigma: Bias in community attitudes, adoption research, and practice. Family Relations, 49(4), 363-370. https://doi/10.1111/j.1741-3729.2000.00363.x
24. Yuval-Davis, N. (2011). The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations. Sage