Abstract
As teaching English as a foreign language, it has become obvious that an average Thai is considered to have very low English proficiency. As a result, Thailand may find herself at a disadvantage because of inferior English skills towards globalization and forming of ASEAN community. Thus, the study is devoted to the exploration of English writing skill which sets out to obtain some concrete information on the students’ problems in writing English supported by Systemic Functional Grammar. The result reveals that five problems of the Theme in terms of Theme selections and Thematic progression patterns were found: the problem of empty Theme, the problem of the brand new Theme, the problem of overuse of constant progression, the problem of empty Rheme, and the problem of confusing selection of textual Theme. It is hoped that the current study would be a contribution to the development of linguistic studies. This study will provide not only Thai EFL learners with a better understanding of problems in order to help them improve their writing performance, but will also provide Thai teachers with information that will help to develop English teaching materials and practical tools for Thai EFL learners, especially for teaching writing in EFL classroom.
References
- Abdulsata, P. (1999). An Error Analysis of Srinakharinwirot University Second-Year English Major Students Compositions. M.A. Thesis: Srinakharinwirot University.
- Bloor T. & Bloor M. (1995). The functional analysis of English: a Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.
- Boon-Long, V. (1998). Error Analysis in Writing of the English Major Students of Chiang Mai University for English 221 and English 222. A research report: Department of English, Chiang Mai University.
- Coffin, C. & Hewings, A. (2005). Engaging electronically: using CMC to develop students’ argumentation skills in Higher Education. Language and Education, 19(1), 32-49.
- Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. New York: Pinter Publishers.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
- _________. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Hodder, London.
- Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to functional grammar. Third edition. London: Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
- Lukanavanich, S. (1988). An Analysis of Written Errors of First-Year English Students at Bangkok University. M.Ed. Thesis: Silpakorn University.
- Lush, B. (2002). Writing Errors: A Study of Thai Students’ Writing Errors. Thai TESOL Bulletin. 15(1), 75-82.
- Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children Writing, (pp. 21-29). Geelong: Deakin University Press.
- ________. (1997). ‘Analysing genre: Functional parameters’. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, (pp.3-39). London and New York: Continuum.
- ________. (1998). ‘Linguistics and the Consumer: The Practice of Theory’. Linguistics and Education, 9(4): 411-448.
- Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
- Nwogu, K. & Bloor, T. (1991). Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: approaches and uses, (pp. 369-384). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Paltridge, B. (2000). Making Sense of Discourse analysis. Gold Coast, Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
- ________. (2006). Discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
- Patpong, P. (2002). On Themes as a Textual Resource in Thai. Paper presented at The 14 th Euro-International Systemic Functional Linguistics Workshop: Issues in Language Description: Rethinking Systemic Functional Theory at the University of Lisbon, 24-27 July 2002.
- Pawapatcharaudom, R. (2007). An Investigation of Thai Students’ English Language Problems and Their Learning Strategies in the International Program at Mahidol University. M.A. Thesis: King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology North Bangkok.
- Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-241. Selinker, L. & Lamendella. J. T. (1978). Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3(2), 143-190.
- Srinon, U. (1999). An Error Analysis of Free Compositions Written by the First Year Students of Mahamakut Buddhist University,. M.Ed. Thesis: Silpakorn University.
- Wang, L. (2007). Theme and rheme in the thematic organization of text: Implication for teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 1-11.
Abstract
İngilizceyi yabancı dil olarak öğretirken, ortalama bir Taylandlının çok düşük bir İngilizce seviyesine sahip olduğu açıkça görülmektedir. Düşük İngilizce becerilerinden ve Güneydoğu Asya Milletler Birliliği’nin bir parçası olduğundan dolayı Tayland dezavantajlı olmaktadır. Bu yüzden, bu çalışma öğrencilerin Sistemik İşlevsel Dil Bilgisi tarafından desteklenen İngilizce yazmadaki problemleri üzerine bazı bilgiler elde etmeyi amaçlayarak İngilizce yazmanin keşfine yönelmektedir. Özne seçimleri ve özne devamlılık ögeleri açısından sonuçlar öznelikle alakalı beş problemin bulunduğunu ortaya koymaktadır: öznenin olmaması problemi, daha once kullanılmamış yeni bir öznenin kullanılması problemi, özne devamlılığının aşırı kullanılması problemi, yüklemin olmaması problemi ve metinsel öznenin karmaşık seçimi problemi. Bu çalışmanın dilbilimsel çalışmaların gelişimine katkı sağlaması umulmaktadır. Bu araştırma, sadece İngilizce’yi yabancı dil olarak öğrenen Taylandlı öğrencilere kendilerinin yazma performanslarını geliştirmelerine yardımcı olmak için karşılaşılan problemlerin daha geniş kapsamlı bilgisini sunmakla kalmayacak, aynı zamanda Taylandlı öğretmenlere, özellikle de İngilizce’nin yabancı dil olarak öğretildiği sınıflarda yazma becerilerini öğretenlere, Taylandlı öğrenciler için İngilzice öğretme materyalleri ve pratik araçlar geliştirmeye yardımcı olacak bilgileri de sunmaktadır.
References
- Abdulsata, P. (1999). An Error Analysis of Srinakharinwirot University Second-Year English Major Students Compositions. M.A. Thesis: Srinakharinwirot University.
- Bloor T. & Bloor M. (1995). The functional analysis of English: a Hallidayan approach. London: Arnold.
- Boon-Long, V. (1998). Error Analysis in Writing of the English Major Students of Chiang Mai University for English 221 and English 222. A research report: Department of English, Chiang Mai University.
- Coffin, C. & Hewings, A. (2005). Engaging electronically: using CMC to develop students’ argumentation skills in Higher Education. Language and Education, 19(1), 32-49.
- Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. New York: Pinter Publishers.
- Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.
- _________. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. Hodder, London.
- Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An Introduction to functional grammar. Third edition. London: Edward Arnold.
- Halliday, M. A. K. & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
- Lukanavanich, S. (1988). An Analysis of Written Errors of First-Year English Students at Bangkok University. M.Ed. Thesis: Silpakorn University.
- Lush, B. (2002). Writing Errors: A Study of Thai Students’ Writing Errors. Thai TESOL Bulletin. 15(1), 75-82.
- Martin, J. R. (1984). Language, register and genre. In F. Christie (Ed.), Children Writing, (pp. 21-29). Geelong: Deakin University Press.
- ________. (1997). ‘Analysing genre: Functional parameters’. In F. Christie & J. R. Martin (Eds.), Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school, (pp.3-39). London and New York: Continuum.
- ________. (1998). ‘Linguistics and the Consumer: The Practice of Theory’. Linguistics and Education, 9(4): 411-448.
- Martin, J. R. & Rose, D. (2003). Working with Discourse: Meaning Beyond the Clause. London: Continuum.
- Nwogu, K. & Bloor, T. (1991). Thematic progression in professional and popular medical texts. E. Ventola (Ed.), Functional and systemic linguistics: approaches and uses, (pp. 369-384). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Paltridge, B. (2000). Making Sense of Discourse analysis. Gold Coast, Queensland: Antipodean Educational Enterprises.
- ________. (2006). Discourse analysis. London: Continuum.
- Patpong, P. (2002). On Themes as a Textual Resource in Thai. Paper presented at The 14 th Euro-International Systemic Functional Linguistics Workshop: Issues in Language Description: Rethinking Systemic Functional Theory at the University of Lisbon, 24-27 July 2002.
- Pawapatcharaudom, R. (2007). An Investigation of Thai Students’ English Language Problems and Their Learning Strategies in the International Program at Mahidol University. M.A. Thesis: King Mongkut’s Institute of Technology North Bangkok.
- Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 209-241. Selinker, L. & Lamendella. J. T. (1978). Two perspectives on fossilization in interlanguage learning. Interlanguage Studies Bulletin, 3(2), 143-190.
- Srinon, U. (1999). An Error Analysis of Free Compositions Written by the First Year Students of Mahamakut Buddhist University,. M.Ed. Thesis: Silpakorn University.
- Wang, L. (2007). Theme and rheme in the thematic organization of text: Implication for teaching academic writing. Asian EFL Journal, 9(1), 1-11.
Details
| Primary Language | Turkish |
|---|---|
| Journal Section | Articles |
| Authors | |
| Publication Date | June 1, 2013 |
| Published in Issue | Year 2013 Volume: 7 Issue: 2 |