KOBİ’lerin Örgütsel Öğrenme, Dijitalleşme ve Uluslararasılaşma Süreçleri Üzerine Nitel Bir Çalışma/ A Qualitative Study on Organizational Learning, Digitalization and Internationalization Processes of SMEs

Year 2022, , 102 - 130, 31.12.2022

Bahar Dıvrık , Elif Baykal , Gökhan Silahtaroğlu , Yurdagül Meral

https://doi.org/10.47105/nsb.1115027

Cited By: 3

Abstract

In our research, as Yin (2009) stated the “case study approach” is used when the current context in real life or a situation within the environment needs to be investigated. The research is a qualitative based on semi-structured interviews. In the study, the criterion sampling method is used and the sample is selected from middle and senior managers working in the export, import, sales, marketing, and strategy departments of the Turkish textile and clothing companies within SME’s. Interviews consisting of 29 semi-structured questions were conducted online and recorded with the oral approval of the participants. As Creswell (2013) points out, before the interviews, participants were informed about the purpose of the research and it is essential to be a caring and emphatic listener, adhering to questions throughout the interview. The interviews lasted an average of 25-30 minutes and were performed between 1-31 December 2021.
To ensure the validity and reliability of the research, the survey questions were evaluated by an academic and an experienced manager in the sector and necessary arrangements were made. A pilot interview was conducted to test the comprehensibility of the interview questions and the validity of the questions was confirmed by sharing the results of this interview with both an expert and academic. In addition, in the encodings made by two different coders on the interview document, the consensus among the coders was found to be above the accepted level with 87.50 per cent.
In the theme of organizational learning, the participants mostly expressed their opinions about openness to development/innovation and training. Participants stated that training is important for them as much as innovation. These statements were reflected in the analysis and we found a strong relationship between the two codes. In the light of these findings, it is concluded that organizational learning has a relation to technological innovation and digitalization. A similar result was found in a study of textile SMEs by Abbas et al. (2020), the researchers found a positive relationship between organizational learning and organizational innovation. Tam & Atan (2021) also stated that the knowledge, skills, and experience of the workforce had a positive effect on digitalization. In their qualitative work in Italy, Matarazzo et al. (2021) have shown that organizational capabilities, and in particular the role of family members involved in management, have a positive relationship to achieving a successful digital transformation. Budhiraja (2019), Chênevert et al., (2019) and Chamanian et al. (2018) also found similar positive relationships between organizational learning and digitalization in their research.
In the theme of digitalization, strong relationships have been found between digital platforms and online communication, technological innovation, and B2B online sales. In the theme of internationalization, a strong relationship is found between market research and plan/strategy formulation processes and technological innovations, and the use of technology. These findings show that digitalization has a relation to internationalization. Like our research, the studies of Denicolai et al. (2021), Lecerf & Omrani (2019) and Macchion et al. (2017) have found a positive relationship between digitalization and internationalization. One study conducted between 2005 and 2009 by Bergamaschi et al. (2021), focused on how digitalization strengthens the balance between perceived risk and return in internationalization and under what conditions digitalization affects international competitive advantage and performance. Chen & Kamal (2016) and Watson et al. (2018) examined how digital internationalization eliminates the importance of distance and location for SMEs and creates new market opportunities.

Keywords

Qualitative research, organizational learning, digitalization, internationalization

KOBİ’lerin Örgütsel Öğrenme, Dijitalleşme ve Uluslararasılaşma Süreçleri Üzerine Nitel Bir Çalışma/ A Qualitative Study on Organizational Learning, Digitalization and Internationalization Processes of SMEs

Abstract

Dijitalleşmenin gelişimi, uluslararası işletmecilik alanında Küçük ve Orta Ölçekli İşletmeler (KOBİ) için yeni fırsatlar ortaya çıkarmıştır. KOBİ'lerin dijitalleşmesi, örgütsel öğrenmenin ana aktör olduğu sosyo-teknik bir süreçtir. Çalışmamızın temel amacı, KOBİ’lerde örgütsel öğrenme, dijitalleşme ve uluslararasılaşma arasındaki ilişkileri derinlemesine incelemektir. Araştırma’da KOBİ statüsünde tekstil ve konfeksiyon sanayinde faaliyet gösteren 14 yönetici ile yarı yapılandırılmış 29 sorudan oluşan görüşmeler gerçekleştirilmiş, veriler Maxqda nitel araştırma programında analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın geçerliliğini ve güvenirliğini sağlamak amacıyla hazırlanan sorular bir akademisyen ve sektörde deneyimli bir yönetici tarafından değerlendirilmiş ve gerekli düzenlemeler yapılmıştır. Görüşme sorularının anlaşılırlığını test etmek için pilot görüşme yapılmış ve bu görüşmenin sonuçları alanında uzman bir akademisyen ve yönetici ile tekrar paylaşılarak soruların geçerliliği teyit edilmiştir. Ek olarak, görüşme belgesi üzerinde iki farklı kodlayıcı tarafından yapılan kodlamalarda kodlayıcılar arası görüş birliği yüzde 87,50 ile kabul edilen seviyenin üzerinde bulunmuştur.
Araştırma sonucunda Türk tekstil ve konfeksiyon sektörlerinde faaliyet gösteren KOBİ’lerin örgütsel öğrenme alanında gelişime/yeniliğe ve hizmet içi eğitimlere verdikleri, özellikle son zamanlarda dijitalleşme üzerine olan yenilikleri takip ettikleri belirlenmiştir. Dijitalleşme temasında, dijital platformlar ile online iletişim, teknolojik yenilikçilik ve B2B online satış arasında kuvvetli ilişkiler bulunmuştur. Uluslarasılaşma sürecinde özellikle pazar araştırmaları ve plan/strateji oluşturma süreçleri ile teknolojik yenilikler ve teknoloji kullanımı arasında kuvvetli ilişki bulunmuştur. Bulgular, örgütsel öğrenmenin dijitalleşme, dijitalleşmenin de uluslararasılaşma üzerindeki olumlu etkilerini ortaya koymuştur

Keywords

Nitel araştırma, örgütsel öğrenme, dijitalleşme, uluslararasılaşma

References

• Abbas, J., Zhang, Q., Hussain, I., Akram, S., Afaq, A., & Shad, M. A. (2020). Sustainable innovation in small medium enterprises: the impact of knowledge management on organizational innovation through a mediation analysis by using SEM approach. Sustainability, 12(6), 2407.
• Antunes, H. J. G. & Paulo, G.C. (2020). Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge 5(2), 140-149.
• Aral, S., Dellarocas, C., & Godes, D. (2013). Social media and business transformation: A framework for research. Information Systems Research, 24, 3–13.
• Argote, L. (2013). Organization learning: A theoretical framework. In Organizational learning (pp. 31-56).
• Argote, L. (2011). Organizational learning research: Past, present and future, Management Learning, 42(4), 439-446.
• Arias-Pérez, J., Velez-Ocampo, J., & Cepeda-Cardona, J. (2021). Strategic orientation toward digitalization to improve innovation capability: why knowledge acquisition and exploitation through external embeddedness matter. Journal of Knowledge Management. 25(5), 1319-1335.
• Autio, E. (2017). Digitalisation, Ecosystems, Entrepreneurship and Policy. Perspectives into Topical Issues Is Society and Ways to Support Political Decision Making. Government’s Analysis, Research and Assessment Activities Policy Brief 20/2017.
• Bagheri, A., & Jin, J. (2019). Photopolymerization in 3D printing. ACS Applied Polymer Materials, 1(4), 593-611.
• Barnes, M. (2012). Care in everyday life: An ethic of care in practice. Policy Press.
• Bergamaschi, M., Bettinelli, C., Lissana, E., & Picone, P. M. (2021). Past, ongoing, and future debate on the interplay between internationalization and digitalization. Journal of Management and Governance, 25(4), 983-1032.
• Bienhaus, F. & Haddud, A. (2018). Procurement 4.0: factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains. Business Process Management Journal, 4(2),965-984.
• Brouthers, K. D., Geisser, K. D., & Rothlauf, F. (2016). Explaining the internationalization of ibusiness firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5), 513-534.
• Buckley, P.J. & Ghauri, P.N. (2004). Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of multinational enterprises, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 81-98.
• Budhiraja, S. (2019). Organizational readiness for change: an inherent concern for Indian SMEs. Development and Learning in Organizations, 33(2), 4-7.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2012). Örnekleme yöntemleri. Pegem Yayınevi.
• Calof, J. L. & Beamish, P. W. (1995). Adapting to foreign markets : Explaining internationalization, International Business Review, 4(2), 115–131.
• Chamanian, S., Uluşan, H., Koyuncuoğlu, A., Muhtaroğlu, A., & Külah, H. (2018). An adaptable interface circuit with multistage energy extraction for low-power piezoelectric energy harvesting. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 34(3), 2739-2747.
• Chen, J., Zhang, R., & Wu, D. (2018). Equipment maintenance business model innovation for sustainable competitive advantage in the digitalization context: Connotation, types, and measuring. Sustainability, 10(11), 3970.
• Chen, W., & Kamal, F. (2016). The impact of information and communication technology adoption on multinational frm boundary decisions. Journal of International Business Studies, 47(5), 563–576.
• Chênevert, D., Kilroy, S., & Bosak, J. (2019). The role of change readiness and colleague support in the role stressors and withdrawal behaviors relationship among health care employees. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 32(2), 208-223.
• Chong, A. Y., Chan, F. T., Ooi, K. B., & Sim, J. J. (2011). Can Malaysian firms improve organizational/innovation performance via SCM. Industrial Management & Data Systems.
• Coviello, N., Kano, L., & Liesch, P. W. (2017). Adapting the Uppsala model to a modern world: Macro context and microfoundations. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), 1151–1164.
• Creswell, J. W., (2017). Nitel araştırmacılar için 30 temel beceri. Anı Yayıncılık.
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage
• Crick, D. & Jones, M. V. (2000). Small high-technology firms and international high- technology markets. Journal of International Marketing, 8(2), 63–85.
• De Marco, C. E., Martelli, I., & Di Minin, A. (2020). European SMEs’ engagement in open innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152.
• Denicolai, S., Zucchella, A., & Magnani, G. (2021). Internationalization, digitalization, and sustainability: Are SMEs ready? A survey on synergies and substituting effects among growth paths. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166.
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). Introduction: Disciplining the practice of qualitative research. Sage.
• Dethine, B., Enjolras, M., & Monticolo, D. (2020). Digitalization and SMEs’ export management: Impacts on resources and capabilities. Technology Innovation Management Review, 10(4).
• Divrik, B., & Baykal, E. (2022). Uluslararası işletmecilik teorilerine kavramsal bir bakış. Alanya Akademik Bakış, 6(1), 1843-1846.
• Eldridge, D., Nisar, T. M., & Torchia, M. (2021). What impact does equity crowdfunding have on SME innovation and growth? Small Business Economics, 56(1), 105-120.
• Easterby‐Smith, M., Crossan, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783-796.
• Eller, R., Alford, P., Kallmünzer, A., & Peters, M. (2020). Antecedents, consequences, and challenges of SMEs digitalization. Journal of Business Research, 112, 119-127.
• Falahat, M., Ramayah, T., Soto-Acosta, P., & Lee, Y. Y. (2020). SMEs internationalization: The role of product innovation, market intelligence, pricing and marketing communication capabilities as drivers of SMEs’ international performance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 152.
• Fitzpatrick, P. (2010). In it together: organizational learning through participation in environmental assessment. In Tools, Techniques And Approaches For Sustainability. Collected Writings in Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (pp. 267-292).
• Ghobakhloo, M. (2019). Determinants of information and digital technology implementation for smart manufacturing. International Journal of Production Research, 1–22. Gray, J., & Rumpe, B. (2017). Models for the digital transformation. Software & Systems Modelling, 16(2), 307–308.
• Halabi, A. K., Barrett, R., & Dyt, R. (2010). Understanding financial information used to assess small firm performance: An Australian qualitative study, Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 7(2), 163-179.
• Hannibal, M., & Knight, G. (2018). Additive manufacturing and the global factory: Disruptive technologies and the location of international business. International Business Review, 27(6), 1116-1127.
• Hendriarto, P. (2021). Understanding of the role of digitalization to business model and innovation: economics and business review studies. Linguistics and Culture Review, 5(S1), 160-173.
• Holland, C. P., & Gutiérrez-Leefmans, M. (2018). A taxonomy of SME e-commerce platforms derived from a market-level analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 22(2), 161-201.
• Hutahayan, B. (2021). The relationships between market orientation, learning orientation, financial literacy, on the knowledge competence, innovation, and performance of small and medium textile industries in Java and Bali. Asia Pacific Management Review, 26(1), 39-46.
• Hyett, N., Kenny, A., & Dickson-Swift, V. (2014). Methodology or method? A critical review of qualitative case study reports. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being, 9(1), 23606.
• Imron, M. A., Munawaroh, U. I., Farida, R. D. M., Paramarta, V., Sunarsi, D., Akbar, I. R., & Masriah, I. (2021). Effect of organizational culture on innovation capability employees in the knowledge sharing perspective: Evidence from digital industries. Annals of the Romanian Society for Cell Biology, 4189-4203.
• Ivanova, I. A., Pulyaeva, V. N., Vlasenko, L. V., Gibadullin, A. A., & Sadriddinov, M. I. (2019). Digitalization of organizations: current issues, managerial challenges and socio-economic risks. In Journal of physics: conference series 1399(3).
• Jiang, G., Kotabe, M., Zhang, F., Hao, A. W., Paul, J., & Wang, C. L. (2020). The determinants and performance of early internationalizing firms: A literature review and research agenda. International Business Review, 29(4), 101662.
• Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies. 8(1), 23–32.
• Johanson, J. & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: From liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.
• Johanson, J. & Mattson L.G. (2015). Internationalisation in industrial systems—a network approach. Knowledge, Networks and Power. 111-132.
• Jung, H., Hwang, J., & Kim, B. K. (2018). Does R&D investment increase SME survival during a recession?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 137, 190-198.
• Kergroach S. (2020) Giving momentum to SME digitalization, Journal of the International Council for Small Business, 1,(1), 28-31
• Kim, D., Jean, R. J. B., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2018). Drivers of virtual interfirm integration and its impact on performance in international customer-supplier relationships. Management International Review, 58(3), 495–522.
• Kumpikaite V. (2008) Human resource development in learning organization, Journal of Business Economics and Management, 9(1), 25-31
• Kutnjak, A., Pihiri, I., & Furjan, M. T. (2019). Digital transformation case studies across industries–literature review. 42nd international convention on information and communication technology, electronics and microelectronics (1293–1298).
• Lamb, J. J. (2020). Process Digitalisation. Anaerobic digestion: from biomass to biogas.
• Lecerf, M., & Omrani, N. (2019). Internationalization: The impact of information technology and innovation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.11, 805-824.
• Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W., & Mao, J. Y. (2018). Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Information System Journal, 28, 1129–1157.
• Lu, J.W. & Beamish, P.W. (2001). The internationalization and performance of SMEs. Strategic Management Journal. 22(6), 565-586.
• Macchion, L., Moretto, A.M., Caniato, F., Caridi, M., Danese, P., & Vinelli, A. (2017). International ecommerce for fashion products: What is the relationship with performance? International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 45(9), 1011- 1031
• Macpherson, A. & Holt R. (2007). Knowledge, Learning and Small Firm Growth: Systematic Review of the Evidence. Research Policy, 36(2), 172–192.
• Mahto, R. V., McDowell, W. C., Kudlats, J., & Dunne, T. C. (2018). Learning orientation and performance satisfaction as predictors of small firm innovation: the moderating role of gender. Group Decision and Negotiation, 27(3), 375-391.
• Matarazzo, M., Penco, L., Profumo, G., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Digital transformation and customer value creation in Made in Italy SMEs: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of Business Research, 123, 642-656.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. Jossey-Bass.
• Neubert, M. (2018). The Impact of Digitalization on the Speed of Internationalization of Lean Global Startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5), 44-54
• Nguyen, H., Newby, M., and Macaulay, M. J. (2015) Information technology adoption in small business: Confirmation of a proposed framework. Journal of Small Business Management, 53, 207–227.
• Nguyen, H. (2009). Information technology adoption in SMEs: An integrated framework, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 15(2), 162–186.
• Niemand, T., Rigtering, J. P. C., Kallmünzer, A., Kraus, S., & Maalaoui, A. (2020). Digitalization in the financial industry: A contingency approach of entrepreneurial orientation and strategic vision on digitalization. European Management Journal.39(3), 317-326.
• Osarenkhoe, A., & Fjellström, D. (2021). The Oxymoron of Digitalization: A Resource-Based Perspective. Journal of Information Technology Research, 14(4), 1-17.
• Özcan, G. B., Mondragon, A. E. C., & Harindranath, G. (2018). Strategic entry and operational integration of emerging market firms: The case of Cemex, Beko and Tata Steel in the UK. Journal of Business Research, 93, 242–254.
• Park, C., Oh, C. H., & Kasim, A. (2017). Market challenges, learning and customer orientation, and innovativeness in IJVs. International Marketing Review, 34(6), 945-967.
• Parker, C., & Castleman, T. (2007). New directions for research on SME-eBusiness: insights from an analysis of journal articles from 2003-2006. Journal of Information Systems and Small Business, 1(1), 21-40.
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283.
• Pereira, C. S., Durão, N., Moreira, F., & Veloso, B. (2022). The Importance of Digital Transformation in International Business. Sustainability, 14(2), 834.
• Ramdani, B., Rajab, S., & Kayumovab, M. (2021). Digital innovation in SMEs: A systematic review, synthesis and research agenda. Information Technology for Development, 28(1), 1-17.
• Ragin, C. C., & Becker, H. S. (1992). What is a case?: Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. Cambridge University Press
• Rehm, S. V. & Goel, L. (2017). Using information systems to achieve complementarity in SME innovation networks. Information & Management, 54(4), 438-451.
• Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., & Matos, P. (2018). Digital transformation: a literature review and guidelines for future research. In World conference on information systems and technologies (411-421).
• Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., Botella-Carrubi, D., Palacios-Marqués, D., & Orero-Blat, M. (2021). The effect of digitalization on business performance: An applied study of KIBS. Journal of Business Research, 126, 319-326.
• Quinton, S., Canhoto, A., Molinillo, S., Pera, R., & Budhathoki, T. (2017). Conceptualising a digital orientation: Antecedents of supporting SME performance in the digital economy. Journal of Strategic Marketing. 26(5), 427-439, DOI: 10.1080/0965254X.2016.1258004.
• Schneider, M. (2018). Digitalization of production, human capital, and organizational capital. In The impact of digitalization in the workplace 39-52.
• Schweizer, R. (2012). The internationalization process of SMEs: A muddling-through process. Journal of Business Research 65, 745–51
• Sejjaaka, S., Mindra, R., & Nsereko, I. (2015). Leadership traits and business sustainability in Ugandan SMEs: A qualitative analysis. International Journal Of Management Science And Business Administration 10.
• Simsek, Z., & Heavey, C. (2011). The mediating role of knowledge‐based capital for corporate entrepreneurship effects on performance: A study of small‐to medium‐sized firms. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(1), 81-100.
• Sommer, L. (2015). Industrial revolution-industry 4.0: Are German manufacturing SMEs the first victims of this revolution?. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management, 8(5), 1512-1532. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
• Strange, R., & Zucchella, A. (2017). Industry 4.0, global value chains and international business. Multinational Business Review, 25(3), 174–184.
• Szymura-Tyc, M. (2021). Learning by outward and inward internationalization and the outward/inward innovativeness of firms in Poland. International Journal of Management and Economics, 57(1), 44-68.
• Tham, K. W., & Atan, S. A. (2021). SME Readiness Towards Digitalization in Malaysia. Research in Management of Technology and Business, 2(1), 361-375.
• Torn, I. A. R., & Vaneker, T. H. (2019). Mass Personalization with Industry 4.0 by SMEs: A concept for collaborative networks. Procedia manufacturing, 28, 135-141.
• Vendrell-Herrero, F., Gomes, E., Bustinza, O. F., & Mellahi, K. (2018). Uncovering the role of cross-border strategic alliances and expertise decision centralization in enhancing product-service innovation in MMNEs. International Business Review, 27(4), 814-825.
• Verhoef, P. C., Kannan, P. K., & Inman, J. J. (2015). From multi-channel retailing to omni-channel retailing: introduction to the special issue on multi-channel retailing. Journal of Retailing, 91(2), 174-181.
• Vukšić, V., Ivančić, L., & Vugec, D. (2018). A Preliminary Literature Review of Digital Transformation Case Studies. International Journal of Computer and Information Engineering, 12(9), 737-742.
• Yamin, M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2006). Online internationalisation, psychic distance reduction and the virtuality trap. International Business Review, 15(4), 339-360.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage.
• Wang, X., Liao, J., Xia, D., & Chang, T. (2010). The impact of organizational justice on work performance: Mediating effects of organizational commitment and leader‐member exchange. International Journal of Manpower,31(6), 660-677.
• Watson IV, G. F., Weaven, S., Perkins, H., Sardana, D., & Palmatier, R. W. (2018). International market entry strategies: Relational, digital, and hybrid approaches. Journal of International Marketing, 26(1), 30-60.
• Welch, L. S. & Luostarinen. R. K. (1988). Internationalization: Evolution of a concept. Journal of General Management, 14(2), 34-55.
• Wroblewski, J. (2018). Digitalization and Firm Performance: Are Digitally Mature Firms Outperforming Their Peers?. Lund University School Of Economics And Management. Masters.