Friendly Hospital for Nursing Students Requirements and Motivating Factors in a Hospital/ Hemşirelik Öğrencileri İçin Öğrenme Dostu Hastanede Olması Gerekenler ve Hastanede Motive Edici Faktörler

Year 2025, Volume: 7 Issue: 1, 49 - 63, 30.06.2025

Sevda Uzun , Şevval Baygın

https://doi.org/10.47105/nsb.1588988

https://izlik.org/JA47CT32NA

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the learning-friendly environment for nursing students and the motivating factors within the hospital from the students' perspective, using a qualitative phenomenological approach. Phenomenological research design, a qualitative research approach, was employed in this study. This qualitative research was conducted with 60 volunteer nursing students. Interviews were conducted individually and face-to-face. Data was analyzed using Colaizzi's phenomenological analysis method. Data analysis revealed three categories (potential motivating factors in a learning friendly hospital, behaviors of faculty members and nurses in the hospital to increase students' motivation, and expectations from a learning-friendly hospital) and seven sub-themes (communication, knowledge, skills, people, environment, physical aspects, and psychological aspects). Nursing students expect learning-friendly hospital environments to be instructive, encouraging, anxiety-free and well-equipped in all aspects. It was determined that effective communication with nurses and other team members, receiving positive feedback from patients, and instructive and supportive approaches of instructors increased the motivation of nursing students. In addition, it was found that students want to contribute to the improvement of the quality of care by practicing as a part of the team in learning-friendly hospitals.

Keywords

Learning-friendly hospital , motivation , nursing student , qualitative study

Project Number

YOK

Friendly Hospital for Nursing Students Requirements and Motivating Factors in a Hospital/ Hemşirelik Öğrencileri İçin Öğrenme Dostu Hastanede Olması Gerekenler ve Hastanede Motive Edici Faktörler

https://izlik.org/JA47CT32NA

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, hemşirelik öğrencileri için öğrenme dostu hastanede olması gerekenler ve hastanede motive edici faktörleri öğrencilerin gözünden niteliksel fenomenolojik bir yaklaşım kullanarak değerlendirmektir. Bu araştırmada nitel araştırma deseni olan fenomenolojik araştırma tasarımı kullanılmıştır. Bu nitel araştırma 60 gönüllü hemşirelik öğrencisi ile yapılmıştır. Görüşmeler bireysel olarak ve yüz yüze gerçekleştirilmiştir. Veriler, Colaizzi'nin fenomenolojik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde üç kategori (öğrenme dostu hastanede potansiyel motive edici faktörler, öğretim elemanları ve hastanedeki hemşirelerin öğrencilerin motivasyonunun artırılmasına yönelik davranışları ve öğrenme destekli hastaneden beklentiler) yedi alt tema (iletişim, bilgi, beceri, kişiler, ortam, fiziksel açıdan ve psikolojik açıdan) saptanmıştır. Hemşirelik öğrencileri öğrenme dostu hastane ortamlarının öğretici, öğrenmeye teşvik edici, kendilerinde anksiyete yaratmayan ve her açıdan donanımlı alanlar olmasını beklemektedir. Hemşirelik öğrencilerinin hemşirelerle ve diğer ekip üyeleri etkin iletişimin, hastalardan olumlu geri bildirim alınmasının, öğretim elemanlarının öğretici ve destekleyici yaklaşımlarının öğrencilerin motivasyonunu artırdığı belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca öğrenciler öğrenme dostu hastanelerde ekibin bir parçası olarak uygulama yaparak bakım kalitesinin artmasına katkıda bulunmak istedikleri sonucu bulunmuştur.

Keywords

Öğrenme dostu hastane , motivasyon , hemşirelik öğrencisi , nitel çalışma

Project Number

YOK

References

• Abbey J, Abbey B, Bridges P, Elder R, Lemke P, Liddle J & Thornton R (2006) Clinical placements in residen- tial aged care facilities: the impact on nursing students' perception of aged care and the effect on career plans. The Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing 23, 14-19.
• Admi, H., Moshe-Eilon, Y., Sharon, D. & Mann, M. 2018. Nursing students' stress and satisfaction in clinical practice along different stages: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education Today, 68, 86-92.
• Aktaş, Y. Y. & Karabulut, N. 2016. A survey on Turkish nursing students' perception of clinical learning environment and its association with academic motivation and clinical decision making. Nurse Educ Today, 36, 124-8
• Alshowkan, A.A., Fouad Kamel, N.M., (2016). Nursing student experiences of psychiatric clinical practice: a qualitative study. J. Nurs. Health Sci. 5 (3), 60-67. https://doi. org/10.9790/1959-0503056067.
• Altunay, E., Oral, G., & Yalçınkaya, M. (2014). A qualitative research about mobbing implications ineducational institutions. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 4(1), 62-80.
• Arabacı, L. B., Korhan, E. A., Tokem, Y. & Torun, R. 2015. Nursing Students’ anxiety and stress levels and contributed factors beforeduring and after first clinical placement. Journal of Hacettepe University Faculty of Nursing, 2, 1-16.
• Başkaya, E., & Demir, S. (2023). The problems and information needs of patients with bipolar disorder during the treatment process: A qualitative study in Turkey. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, 42, 45-54.
• Bayır, B., Özdemir, D., & Palaz, G. (2020). Determination of the difficulties encountered by undergraduate nursing students studying in Konya province in clinical practice. KTO Karatay University Journal of Health Sciences, 1(2), 21-31.
• Benner P., Tanner C.A. & Chesla C.A. (1996) Expertise in Nursing Practice: Caring, Clinical Judgment, and Ethics. Springer Publish-ing Company, New York.
• Bilgin, H., Özcan, N.K., Tulek, Z., Kaya, F., Boyacioglu, N. E., Erol, O., Arguvanli Coban, S., Pazvantoglu, O. & Gumus, K. 2016. Student nurses' perceptions of aggression: an exploratory study of defensive styles, aggression experiences, and demographic factors. Nurs Health Sci, 18, 216-22.
• Bjørk, I. T., Berntsen, K., Brynildsen, G., & Hestetun, M. (2014). Nursing students' perceptions of their clinical learning environment in placements outside traditional hospital settings. Journal of clinical nursing, 23(19-20), 2958-2967.
• Bozbaş, Y. (2015). The Relationship Between Classroom Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Classroom Management Skill Perceptions (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Istanbul Aydın University, Istanbul.
• Courtney M, Edwards H, Smith S & Finlayson K (2002) The impact of rural clinical placement on student nurses' employment intentions. Collegian: Journal of the Royal College of Nursing, Australia 9, 12-18
• Demir, S., Ercan, F., (2018). The first clinical practice experiences of psychiatric nursing students: a phenomenological study. Nurse Educ. Today 61, 146-152. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.nedt.2017.11.019.
• Edwards H, Smith S, Finlayson K & Chapman H (2004) The impact of clinical placement location on nursing students' competence and preparedness for practice. Nurse Education Today, 24, 248-255.
• Er, F. (2013). Investigation of working conditions of nurses working in public hospitals according to nurse-friendly hospital criteria. Atatürk University Institute of Health Sciences, Master's Thesis, 2013, Erzurum
• Erkal İlhan, S. (2018). Changes in University Nursing Undergraduate Education Curriculum from Past to Present. 1st International & 3rd National Nursing History Congress Izmir, 905.
• Fagerberg I, Winbald B & Ekman S (2000). Influencing aspects in nursing education on Swedish nursing students' choices of first work area as graduated nurses. Journal of Nursing Education, 39, 211-218.
• Günay, U. & Kılınç, G. 2018. The transfer of theoretical knowledge to clinical practice by nursing students and the difficulties they experience: A qualitative study. Nurse Educ Today, 65, 81-86.
• Günaydin, N., & Çoban, S. A. (2021). Experiences of nursing students during clinical education in mental health clinics: A phenomenological qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice, 54, 103113.
• Happel B & Gaskin CJ (2013) The attitudes of undergraduate nursing students towards mental health nursing: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Nursing 22, 148-158.
• Happel, B & Platania-Phung C (2012). Mental health placements in a general health setting: no substitute for the real thing! Journal of Clinical Nursing 21, 2026-2033.
• Hisamatsu, Y., Hasada, K., Amano, F., Tsubota, Y., Wasada-Tsutsui, Y., Shirai, N., ... & Odashima, K. (2006). Highly Selective Recognition of Adenine Nucleobases by Synthetic Hosts with a Linked Five-Six-Five- Membered Triheteroaromatic Structure and the Application to Potentiometric Sensing of the Adenine Nucleotide. Chemistry-A European Journal, 12(29), 7733-7741.
• Jack, K., Hamshire, C., Harris, W. E., Langan, M., Barrett, N. & Wibberley, C. 2018. "My mentor didn't speak to me for the first four weeks": Perceived unfairness experienced by nursing students in clinical practice settings. J Clin Nurs, 27, 929-938.
• Meraviglia, M., Grobe, S. J., Tabone, S., Wainwright, M., Shelton, S., Miner, H., & Jordan, C. Creating a positive work environment: Implementation of the nurse-friendly hospital criteria. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration. 2009; 39 (2): 64-70.
• Meraviglia, M., Grobe, S. J., Tabone, S., Wainwright, M., Shelton, S., Yu, L., & Jordan, C. Nurse-friendly hospital project: Enhancing nurse retention and quality of care. Journal of Nursing Care Quality. 2008; 23 (4): 305-313.
• Merriam, S. B., & Grenier, R. S. (Eds.). (2019). Qualitative research in practice: Examples for discussion and analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
• Mikkonen, K., Merilainen, M. & Tomietto, M. 2020a. Empirical model of clinical learning environment and mentoring of culturally and linguistically diverse nursing students. J Clin Nurs, 29, 653-661.
• Morrow, R., Rodriguez, A., & King, N. (2015). Colaizzi's descriptive phenomenological method. The Psychologist, 28(8), 643-644.
• Newton, J. M., Jolly, B. C., Ockerby, C. M., & Cross, W. M. (2010). Clinical learning environment inventory: factor analysis. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(6), 1371-1381.
• Ögel K. (2009). Motivational interview technique. Türkiye Klinikleri Psychiatry-Special Topics, 2(2),41- 4.
• Özkütük, N., Orgun, F., & Akçakoca, B. (2018). Investigation of the Current Situation Regarding Higher Education Institutions Providing Nursing Education in Turkey. Journal of Higher Education, 150-7.
• Özsaban, A., & Bayram, A. (2020). Factors affecting clinical practice experiences of nursing students in Turkey: a systematic review. Ankara Journal of Health Sciences, 9(2), 124-145.
• Şendağ, S., Gedik, N., Caner, M., & Toker, S. (2019). Podcast Use in Mobile Assisted Language Learning: Tutor-Centered Intensive Listening and Mobile Extensive Listening. Mersin University Journal of Faculty of Education, 15(1), 1-27.
• Spence Laschinger, H. K. (1992). Intraclass correlations as estimates of interrater reliability in nursing research. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 14(2), 246-251.
• Tanner C (2006) The next transformation: clinical education. Journal of Nursing Education 45, 99-100.
• Taşdelen, S. & Zaybak, A. 2013. The Determination the level of stress of nursing students during their first clinical experience. J of Florence Nightingale, 21, 101-106
• Tong, A., Sainsbury, P., & Craig, J. (2007). Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): A 32-item checklist for interview sand focus groups. International Journal for Quality in HealthCare, 19(6), 349-357.
• Ulutaşdemir, N., Ay, H., Göçmen, A., Uzun, S., & Kulakaç, N. (2022). Needs of caregivers of patients with palliative neurological problems: a qualitative study. Current Psychology, 1-7.
• Willig, C. (2013). Introducing qualitative research in psychology, 3rd ed. Open University Press.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2016). Qualitative research methods in social sciences, 10th ed. Seçkin Publishing.
• Yıldırım, N., Aydoğan, A., & Bulut, M. (2021). A qualitative study on the experiences of the first nurses assigned to COVID-19 units in Turkey. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(6), 1366-1374.