Research Article

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Volume: 6 Number: 2 May 31, 2025
EN

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks among the foremost causes of cancer-related mortality, with liver metastases (colorectal liver metastases, CLM) considerably affecting prognosis. While surgery is the gold standard for curative treatment, the majority of patients are ineligible due to disease extent or comorbidities. Radioembolization with yttrium-90 (Y-90) microspheres has emerged as a promising locoregional therapy for unresectable CLM. However, its effectiveness in improving survival and tumor control remains an area of active investigation. The clinical results of 59 colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases who received radioembolization treatment were assessed. Treatment response was assessed using imaging modalities, including PET-CT, MRI, and CT. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and treatment response, while secondary outcomes included toxicity profiles and prognostic factors influencing survival. The cohort’s median OS was 9 months, with a mean OS of 13.2 months. Patients exhibiting metabolic response on PET-CT had significantly longer survival (19.3 months) compared to non-responders (8.3 months, p = 0.042). Extrahepatic disease was a strong prognostic factor, with patients without extrahepatic involvement showing a significantly lower OS (7.1 vs. 21 months, p = 0.000). Bilobar disease also negatively impacted survival (p = 0.003). Nearly all patients experienced mild to moderate side effects, with the most common being abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. Severe toxicities were rare, although one patient developed a gastric ulcer.Y-90 radioembolization is an effective and relatively safe treatment for unresectable CLM, particularly in patients without extrahepatic disease. The strong association between metabolic response and survival underscores the potential of PET-CT as a prognostic indicator. Further prospective studies are needed to refine patient selection criteria and optimize treatment protocols.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2023; 73(1):17-48.
  2. 2. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2022; 33(7):664-84.
  3. 3. Salem R, Thurston KG, Carr BI, et al. Yttrium-90 microspheres in the treatment of liver malignancies: Current status and future prospects. Hepatology. 2021; 74(4):2198-210.
  4. 4. Garin E, Tselikas L, Guiu B, et al. Radioembolization for colorectal liver metastases: Where do we stand? J Hepatol. 2020; 73(5):998-1010.
  5. 5. Ricke J, Wust P, Wieners G, et al. Efficacy and safety of radioembolization in colorectal cancer liver metastases: A systematic review. Eur Radiol. 2021; 31(6):3728-42.
  6. 6. Kennedy AS, Nutting C, Coldwell D, et al. Combination of radioembolization and systemic chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: Current evidence and future directions. J Clin Oncol. 2022; 40(12):1342-52.
  7. 7. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Adam R, et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(8):1386-422.
  8. 8. Salem R, Thurston KG. Radioembolization with 90Y microspheres: A state-of-the-art brachytherapy treatment for primary and secondary liver malignancies. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010; 21(8):1153-73.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

May 31, 2025

Submission Date

March 28, 2025

Acceptance Date

May 30, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 6 Number: 2

APA
Karahacioğlu, D., Peker, A., Küçük, M.d., Ö., Bilgiç, S., & Sanlidilek, U. (2025). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. New Trends in Medicine Sciences, 6(2), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.56766/ntms.1667411
AMA
1.Karahacioğlu D, Peker A, Küçük, M.d. Ö, Bilgiç S, Sanlidilek U. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. New Trend Med Sci. 2025;6(2):53-58. doi:10.56766/ntms.1667411
Chicago
Karahacioğlu, Duygu, Ahmet Peker, Özlem Küçük, M.d., Sadık Bilgiç, and Umman Sanlidilek. 2025. “Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases”. New Trends in Medicine Sciences 6 (2): 53-58. https://doi.org/10.56766/ntms.1667411.
EndNote
Karahacioğlu D, Peker A, Küçük, M.d. Ö, Bilgiç S, Sanlidilek U (May 1, 2025) Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. New Trends in Medicine Sciences 6 2 53–58.
IEEE
[1]D. Karahacioğlu, A. Peker, Ö. Küçük, M.d., S. Bilgiç, and U. Sanlidilek, “Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases”, New Trend Med Sci, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 53–58, May 2025, doi: 10.56766/ntms.1667411.
ISNAD
Karahacioğlu, Duygu - Peker, Ahmet - Küçük, M.d., Özlem - Bilgiç, Sadık - Sanlidilek, Umman. “Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases”. New Trends in Medicine Sciences 6/2 (May 1, 2025): 53-58. https://doi.org/10.56766/ntms.1667411.
JAMA
1.Karahacioğlu D, Peker A, Küçük, M.d. Ö, Bilgiç S, Sanlidilek U. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. New Trend Med Sci. 2025;6:53–58.
MLA
Karahacioğlu, Duygu, et al. “Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases”. New Trends in Medicine Sciences, vol. 6, no. 2, May 2025, pp. 53-58, doi:10.56766/ntms.1667411.
Vancouver
1.Duygu Karahacioğlu, Ahmet Peker, Özlem Küçük, M.d., Sadık Bilgiç, Umman Sanlidilek. Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Radioembolization Therapy in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases. New Trend Med Sci. 2025 May 1;6(2):53-8. doi:10.56766/ntms.1667411