Research Article

Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs

Volume: 2 Number: 1 January 25, 2021
EN

Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs

Abstract

During electroencephalogram (EEG) recording of children, sedatives are frequently needed. It’s reported that Chloral hydrate (CH) and Hydroxyzine (H) have negligible negative effect on EEG and are safe. The effect of CH and H on vital signs has not been studied in detail previously. We compared the sedation success, side effects, and effects on vital signs of CH and H during pediatric EEG recording. A total of 60 children with a mean age of 43.3 ± 33 months (CH) and 39.7 ± 29 months (H) were involved in the study. Oral CH (50 mg/kg) was given to thirty children, and oral H (1 mg/kg) to another 30. Vital signs were recorded during the procedure. Sedation success of CH (96.6%) was higher than H (76.6%) (p=0.023). Mean Ramsay Sedation Score (RSS) of CH (4.8±0.7) was higher than H (3.5±1.6) (p=0.00). The mean procedure time in CH group was significantly longer (p=0.000). The CH significantly reduced the mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to H (p=0.007, p=0.003, respectively). SO2 of a patient from CH group decreased to 87%, and vomiting (6.6%) and agitation (3.3%) were observed in two patients. Our findings indicate that CH, due to it’s higher success rate, can be preferred in children who need sedation for EEG. However, in patients who have limited time, H with a shorter total procedure time can be preferred. More comprehensive studies are required about the effects of decreased blood pressure on systems, caused by CH.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

No

References

  1. 1. Angus-Leppan H. Seizures and adverse events during routine scalp electroencephalography: A clinical and EEG analysis of 1000 records. Clin Neurophysiol 2007; 118: 22-30.
  2. 2. Liamsuwan S, Grattan-Smith P, Fagan E, et al. The value of partial sleep deprivation as routine measure in pediatric electroencephalography. Journal of Child Neurology 2000; 15: 26-29.
  3. 3. Sezer T, Alehan F. Chloral hydrate versus hydroxyzine HCL for sedation prior to pediatric sleep EEG recording. Int J Neurosci 2013; 123: 719-723.
  4. 4. Olson DM, Sheehan MG, Thompson W, et al. Sedation of children for electroencephalograms. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 163-165.
  5. 5. Fallah R, Alaei A, Akhavan Karbasi S, et al. Chloral hydrate, chloral hydrate-promethazine and chloral hydrate-hydroxyzine efficacy in electroencephalography sedation. Indian J Pediatr 2014; 81: 541-546.
  6. 6. Dirani M, Nasreddine W, Melhem J, et al. Efficacy of the Sequential Administration of Melatonin, Hydroxyzine, and Chloral Hydrate for Recording Sleep EEGs in Children. Clin EEG Neurosci 2017; 48: 41¬¬-47. 7. Bektas O, Arıca B, Teber S, et al. Chloral hydrate and/or hydroxyzine for sedation in pediatric EEG recording Received. Brain Dev 2014; 36: 130-136.
  7. 8. Faytrouny M, Okte Z, Kucukyavuz Z. Comparison of two different dosages of hydroxyzine for sedation in the paediatric dental patient. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17: 378-382.
  8. 9. Coté CJ, Wilson S. Work Group on Sedation. Guidelines for Monitoring and Management of Pediatric Patients During and After Sedation for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Procedures: An Update. Pediatrics 2006; 118: 2587-2602.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Clinical Sciences

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 25, 2021

Submission Date

December 16, 2020

Acceptance Date

December 21, 2020

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 2 Number: 1

APA
Güler, M. A., Güngör, M., & Tan, H. (2021). Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs. New Trends in Medicine Sciences, 2(1), 31-38. https://izlik.org/JA97CC45AL
AMA
1.Güler MA, Güngör M, Tan H. Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs. New Trend Med Sci. 2021;2(1):31-38. https://izlik.org/JA97CC45AL
Chicago
Güler, Muhammet Akif, Mesut Güngör, and Hüseyin Tan. 2021. “Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs”. New Trends in Medicine Sciences 2 (1): 31-38. https://izlik.org/JA97CC45AL.
EndNote
Güler MA, Güngör M, Tan H (January 1, 2021) Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs. New Trends in Medicine Sciences 2 1 31–38.
IEEE
[1]M. A. Güler, M. Güngör, and H. Tan, “Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs”, New Trend Med Sci, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–38, Jan. 2021, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA97CC45AL
ISNAD
Güler, Muhammet Akif - Güngör, Mesut - Tan, Hüseyin. “Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs”. New Trends in Medicine Sciences 2/1 (January 1, 2021): 31-38. https://izlik.org/JA97CC45AL.
JAMA
1.Güler MA, Güngör M, Tan H. Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs. New Trend Med Sci. 2021;2:31–38.
MLA
Güler, Muhammet Akif, et al. “Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs”. New Trends in Medicine Sciences, vol. 2, no. 1, Jan. 2021, pp. 31-38, https://izlik.org/JA97CC45AL.
Vancouver
1.Muhammet Akif Güler, Mesut Güngör, Hüseyin Tan. Comparison of Chloral Hydrate and Hydroxyzine in Pediatric Electroencephalogram Recording; Sedation Successes and Changes in Vital Signs. New Trend Med Sci [Internet]. 2021 Jan. 1;2(1):31-8. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA97CC45AL