EN
Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection
Abstract
ABSTRACT:
Background
In this study, we aimed to determine the prevalence of galactomannan antigen in various risk groups and to compare the results of two different test kits used in diagnosis and to determine false positivity rates.
Methods
Bio-Rad Platelia Aspergillus Ag kit was used to detect Aspergillus galactomannan antigen in serum samples of patients who were hospitalized in various clinics or admitted to hospital for serious diseases. In order to detect false positives, some of the samples found positive in this test were studied with Bio Bio-Rad” kits as well as “Dynamiker Biotechnology (Tianjin) DNK-SM-1402-1” test kits for the second time. The same procedure was repeated for the third and fourth times.
Results
Galactomannan antigen was searched in 735 different cases. In 306 (41.6) cases were obtained in at least one positive result study. Galactomannan antigen was the most common in septicaemia (75.0%); the lowest rate was found in patients with pre-diagnosis of neoplasm (21.8%). Galactomannan antigen positivity was highest in patients over the age of 65. Galactomannan antigen positivity was found to be very similar in the second and third studies of positive samples. In the fourth repetition, both firms gave 100% similar results. From the first to the last, GM positivity rates gradually decreased and GM positivity of 98 (32.0%) out of 306 positive cases in the first study has continued.
Conclusion
It was determined that the kits belonging to two companies can be used with the same reliability and the positive rates of both tests gradually decreased.
Keywords
References
- REFERENCES 1. Bajpai VK, Khan I, Shukla S, Kumar P, Rather IA, Park Y-H, Huh YS, Han Y-K.Invasive Fungal Infections and Their Epidemiology: Measures in the Clinical Scenario. Biotechnol Bioprocess Eng. 2019; 24(3): 436-444.
- 2. Cruciani M, Mengoli C, Barnes R, Donnelly JP, Loeffler J, Jones BL, Klingspor L, Maertens J, Morton CO, White LP. Polymerase chain reaction blood tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in immunocompromised people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 ;9:CD009551. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009551.pub4.
- 3. Blanchard E, Gabriel F, Jeanne-Leroyer C, Servant V, Dumas PY. The Nationwide Austrian Aspergillus Registry: a prospective data collection on epidemiology, therapy and outcome of invasive mould infections in immunocompromised and/or immunosuppressed patients. Rev Mal Respir. 2018;35(2):171-187. doi: 10.1016/j.rmr.2018.01.002.
- 4. Arvanitis M, Anagnostou T, Fuchs BB, Caliendo AM, Mylonakis E. Molecular and nonmolecular diagnostic methods for invasive fungal infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2014;27(3):490–526. doi:10.1128/CMR.00091-13.
- 5. Huppler AR, Fisher BT, Lehrnbecher T, Walsh TJ, Steinbach WJ. Role of Molecular Biomarkers in the Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseases in Children. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2017;6(suppl_1):S32–S44. doi:10.1093/jpids/pix054.
- 6. Verdaguer V, Walsh TJ, Hope W, Cortez KJ. Galactomannan antigen detection in the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2007; 7(1): 21-32.
- 7. Klont RR, Mennink-Kersten MA, Verweij PE. Utility of Aspergillus antigen detection in specimens other than serum specimens. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39(10):1467-1474.
- 8. Machetti M, Viscoli C. Interactions and false positive results of galactomannan antigen detection for diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis. Infez Med. 2006;14(4):197-207.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Clinical Sciences
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
January 15, 2022
Submission Date
April 26, 2021
Acceptance Date
June 30, 2021
Published in Issue
Year 2022 Volume: 3 Number: 1
APA
Çelebi, D., & Celebi, O. (2022). Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection. New Trends in Medicine Sciences, 3(1), 6-11. https://izlik.org/JA73XA35GC
AMA
1.Çelebi D, Celebi O. Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection. New Trend Med Sci. 2022;3(1):6-11. https://izlik.org/JA73XA35GC
Chicago
Çelebi, Demet, and Ozgur Celebi. 2022. “Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection”. New Trends in Medicine Sciences 3 (1): 6-11. https://izlik.org/JA73XA35GC.
EndNote
Çelebi D, Celebi O (January 1, 2022) Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection. New Trends in Medicine Sciences 3 1 6–11.
IEEE
[1]D. Çelebi and O. Celebi, “Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection”, New Trend Med Sci, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 6–11, Jan. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA73XA35GC
ISNAD
Çelebi, Demet - Celebi, Ozgur. “Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection”. New Trends in Medicine Sciences 3/1 (January 1, 2022): 6-11. https://izlik.org/JA73XA35GC.
JAMA
1.Çelebi D, Celebi O. Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection. New Trend Med Sci. 2022;3:6–11.
MLA
Çelebi, Demet, and Ozgur Celebi. “Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection”. New Trends in Medicine Sciences, vol. 3, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 6-11, https://izlik.org/JA73XA35GC.
Vancouver
1.Demet Çelebi, Ozgur Celebi. Seroprevalence of Galactomannan Antigen in Erzurum and Comparison of Two Different Test Kits for Galactomannan Detection. New Trend Med Sci [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 1;3(1):6-11. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA73XA35GC
