MATEMATİK ÖĞRETİMİNDE SEMANTİK WEB TABANLI İKNA TEKNOLOJİSİ KULLANIMI

Mehmet Ersoy

doi:10.12739/NWSA.2014.9.1.1C0606

SEMANTIC WEB-BASED PERSUASIVE TECHNOLOGY USE IN MATHEMATICS INSTRUCTION

Year 2014, Volume: 9 Issue: 1, 57 - 72, 01.02.2014

Mehmet Ersoy

Abstract

The current study discusses persuasive technology use with regard to mathematics instruction. In addition to the theoretical background on web-based mathematics education, relevant theoretical frameworks on the diffusion of innovation, cognitive load and technology acceptance were discussed followed by particular persuasive technologies to be used in mathematics teaching. The potential of semantic Web with regard to information acquisition was considered and a sample persuasive technology in mathematics teaching (i.e. Wolfram Alpha) was evaluated with regard to instructional affordances and persuasiveness.

Keywords

Mathematics Instruction, Web Based Education, Persuasive Technology, Semantic Web, Wolfram Alpha.,

References

Andersen, M.H., (2009). Impact of Wolfram Alpha on math ed.
Ağustos 21, 2012 tarihinde http://busynessgirl.com/impact-ofwolfram-alpha-on math-ed/ adresinden alınmıştır.
Berners-Lee, T., (2003). Semantic Web status and direction.
ISWC2003 açılış konuşmaları. Kasım 02, 2012 tarihinde http://www.w3.org/2003/Talks/1023-iswc-tbl/slide26-0.html adresinden alınmıştır.
Chandler, P. and Sweller, J., (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8, pp: 293–332. DOI: 10.1207/s1532690xci0804_2
Chandler, P. and Sweller, J., (1992). The split-attention effect as a factor in the design of instruction. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 62, pp:233-246. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044821992.tb01017.x
Choo, C.W. and Marton, C., (2003). Information seeking on the Web by women in IT professions. Internet Research, 13(4), pp:267-280. DOI: 10.1108/10662240310488951
Clark, R.C., Nguyen, F., and Sweller, J., (2005). Efficiency in learning: evidence-based guidelines to manage cognitive load.
San Diego, CA: Pfeiffer. DOI: 10.1002/pfi.4930450920
Cristea, A.I., (2004). What can the Semantic Web do for Adaptive
Educational Hypermedia? Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), pp:40-58. Davis, F.D., (1989). A technology acceptance model for emprically testing new end user information systems: theory and results. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The MIT Sloan School
Of Management, Cambridge, MA. De Jong, T., (2010). Cognitive load theory, educational research, and instructional design: some food for thought.
Instructional Science, 38(2), pp:105-134. doi: 10/1007/s11251009-9110-0
Driscoll, M., (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Boston, MA: Pearson.
Ersoy, M., (2013). Matematik Öğretiminde İkna Teknolojisi
Kullanımının Bilişsel ve Psikososyal Sonuçları. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir. Fogg, B.J., (2003). Persuasive technology: using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann. Girit, H., Eberhard, R., Michelberger, B., and Mutschler, B., (2012). On the precision of search engines: results from a controlled experiment. In: 15th International Conference on
Business Information Systems (BIS 2012), 21-23 May, 2012, Vilnius, Lithuania. Ekim 07, 2012 tarihinde http://dbis.eprints.uni-ulm.de/798/ adresinden alınmıştır.
Gupta, S. and Thakur, N., (2010). Semantic query optimisation with ontology simulation. International Journal Of Web &
Semantic Technology (IJWEST), 1(4),1-10. DOI: 10.5121/ijwest. 201401.
Ijsselsteijn, W., De Kort, Y., Midden, C., Eggen, B., and Van den Hoven, E., (2006). Persuasive technology for human wellbeing: setting the scene. Persuasive 2006 Proceedings, pp:1-4.
Keynejad, H., Kabir, H., and Daneshmand, M., (2011). Introducing an intelligent e-learning content constructor engine. 2nd
International Conference on Education and Management Technology (IPEDR), IACSIT Press, Singapore. Kılıçer, K. ve Odabaşı, H.F., (2010). Bireysel Yenilikçilik
Ölçeği (BYÖ): Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 38, ss:150-164. Luecke, R., (2007). Güç, etki ve ikna. A. Berktay (Ed.), T.
Parlak (Çev.), İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları. Mintz, J. and Aagard, M., (2012). The application of persuasive technology to educational settings. Educational Technology
Research and Development, 60, pp:483-499. DOI: 10.1007/s11423012-9232-y
Oinas-Kukkonen, H. and Harjumaa, M., (2008). A systematic framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems.
Proceedings Of The 3rd International Conference on Persuasive Technology, pp:164-176, Heidelberg: Springer. Paas, F., Renkl, A., and Sweller, J., (2004). Cognitive load theory: instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture. Instructional
Science, 32, pp:1–8. doi:10.1023/B:TRUC.0000021806.17516.d0
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J.E., Tabbers, H.K., and Van Gerven, P.W.M., (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), pp:63– doi:10.1207%2FS15326985EP3801_8
Papasalouros, A., Retalis, S., and Papaspyrou, N., (2004).
Semantic Description of Educational Adaptive Hypermedia based on a Conceptual Model. Educational Technology & Society, 7(4), pp:129-142. Ramachandran, D. and Canny, J., (2008). Applying persuasive technologies in developing regions. HCI for Community and International Development Workshop, CHI 2008. Florence, Italy.
Rogers, E., (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. NY: The Free Press
Rubin, C., (1986). Adoption and implementation of new technologies. Rogers Everett and Frederick Williams (Ed.).In
Communication Technology: The New Media in Society. NY: The Free Press. Simons, H., (2001). Persuasion in society. Londra: Sage Publications.
Snopce, H., Aliu, A., Spahiu, I., and Makasevska, V., (2010).
Methodological aspects of Mathematics using computer algebra systems. Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference On Engineering Education EDUCATION’10, pp:355-360. Straub, E.T., (2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of
Educational Research, 79(2), pp:625-649. doi: 3102/0034654308325896
Sweller, J., Van Merriënboer, J.G., and Paas, F., (1998).
Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educational Psychology Review, 10, pp:251–296. doi: 10.1023/A:1022193728205
Sweller, J., (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, pp:295– 3 doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
Sweller, J., (1993). Some Cognitive processes and their consequences for the organization and presentation of information. Australian Journal of Psychology, 45(1), pp:1–8.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., and Davis, F., (2003).
User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), pp:425- 478. doi:10.2307/30036540
Wang, P.S., Zhou, Y., and Zou, X., (2004).Web-based mathematics education: MeML design and implementation. Proceedings Of The Information Technology: Coding and Computing ITCC 2004, pp:1691
Wang, P.S., Kajler, N., Zhou, Y., and Zou, X., (2003). WME: towards a web for mathematics education. Institute Of
Computational Mathematics, Kent University, OH. Ağustos 20, 2012 tarihinde http://icm. mcs.kent.edu/research/47wang.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
Wilson, T.D., (1997). Information behavior: an interdisciplinary approach. Information Processing and Management, 33(4), pp:5515
Yeygel Çakır, S., (2011). Web siteleri ve ikna: Teknolojinin ikna gücü, (1. Baskı). Konya: Tablet Kitabevi Yayınları.
Zou, X., (2005). Support for online mathematics education: MeML and WME services. Proceedings Of The SoutheastCon IEEE 2005, pp:656-662.