Abstract

ASSESSMENT OF FLOW DURATION CURVES AT DIFFERENT TIME SCALES

Öz

Flow Duration Curve (FDC) is one of the most fundamental tools that provide information for the design of hydropower projects particularly. Therefore, for practitioners who deal hydropower design, understanding the flow duration curve becomes extremely important. The time scales of FDC can be taken as either daily, ten daily, monthly, or annual. Decision makers decide for the required time scale of the FDC based on the purpose of hydropower project in consideration. In this study, FDCs were produced at daily, monthly and annual time scales from the observed mean streamflow data of a selected gauging station from the Meric-Ergene river basin in the European part of Turkey. The data used were obtained from State Hydraulic Works (DSI) of Turkey. Comparison of flow duration curves at different time scales shows that FDCs at shorter time intervals look more beneficial in getting more accurate quantiles needed for hydropower design. By considering the FDC of the gauging station, it is possible to produce power duration curves of the hydropower plant which is an important practical tool.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Flow Duration Curve,Gauging Station,Hydropower,Meric-Ergene River Basin,Power Duration Curve

References

1. • Alganci, U., Coskun, H.G., Eriş, E., Agiralioglu, N., Cigizoglu, K., Yilmaz, L., and Toprak, Z.F., (2009). Hydrologic Modelling with Remote Sensing and GIS for Determination of Hydroelectric Potential in Ungauged Water Basins. TMMOB Harita ve Kadastro Muhendisleri Odasi 12. Turkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayi, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
2. • Arcfield, S.A., Steeves, P.A., Guthrie, J.D., and Ries III, K.G. (2013). Towards a Publicly Available, Map-Based Regional Software Tool to Estimate Unregulated Daily Streamflow at Ungauged Rivers. Geoscientific Model Development, 6, 101–115.
3. • Booker, D.J. and Snelder, T.H., (2012). Comparing Methods for Estimating Flow Duration Curves at Ungauged Sites. Journal of Hydrology, 434-435, 78-94.
4. • Boscarello, L., Ravazzani, G., Cislaghi, A., and Mancini, M., (2016). Regionalization of Flow-duration Curves through Catchment Classification with Streamflow Signatures and Physiographic–Climate Indices, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 21(3), 05015027.
5. • Burgan, H.I., (2016). Assessment of Floodplain Models in Afyonkarahisar, Turkey. International Science Symposium (ISS2016), 01-04 September 2016, 1A30PB, p:143-148, Büyükada, Istanbul, Turkey.
6. • Burgan, H.I. and Aksoy, H., (2016). Regional Flow Duration Curves for Seyhan and Ceyhan Basins. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol:5, Special Issue 12, 121-128.
7. • Castellarin, A., (2014). Regional Prediction of Flow-Duration Curves Using a Three-Dimensional Kriging. Journal of Hydrology, 513, 179-191.
8. • Cigizoglu, H.K., (1997). Mathematical Models of Flow Duration Curves. Istanbul Technical University PhD Thesis. 96 pages.

9. • Dingman, S.L., (1978). Synthesis of Flow‐Duration Curves for Unregulated Streams in New Hampshire. Water Resources Bulletin-American Water Resources Association, vol:14(6), p:1481-1502.
10. • Mimikou, M. and Kaemaki, S., (1985). Regionalization of flow duration characteristics. Journal of Hydrology, vol:82, p:77-91.
11. • Oregon State University, (2005). Analysis Techniques: Flow Duration Example from Streamflow Evaluations for Watershed Restoration Planning and Design, 11 pages.
12. • Quimpo, R.G., Alejandrino, A.A., and McNally, T.A., (1983). Regionalized Flow Duration for Philippines. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, vol:109(4), p:320-330.
13. • Searcy, J.K., (1959). Flow-duration Curves. US Government Printing Office.
14. • Singh, K.P., (1971). Model Flow Duration and Stream Flow Variability. Water Resources Research, vol:7(4), p:1031-1036.