MATURATION PYRAMID OF OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND SAFETY

Abstract

Occupational Health and Safety System (OHS) is important for governments, employers and workers. Recently, OHS program has developed day by day and tried to secure working environment. For this purpose, it is necessary that the written job security rules in the workplace should be internalized by employees, and employers, and government system. Workers can comply from the top to the bottom of organization and contribute to development of rules through their own personal knowledge, experience, and in-house training. In addition, they are complying with job security rules without requiring an audit, which is thus called as an occupational safety culture. Many employees are affected by accident and their health is deteriorated year by year, which inevitably leads to loss of work force thus countries suffering from economic and social damages. Moreover, OHS is not only enough for improving security culture but also requires collateral training and maturation processes. The purpose of OHS activity is to reduce job accidents that declines rate of work harm, economic loss and social problems in the government. Furthermore, occupational safety researches are associated with engineering techniques, in particular. To add, it includes human social and dependent sciences. Maturation and evolution in companies and countries are included in this concept. The present study emphasizes the new model as an approach to fatalism, formalism, prescriptivism, internalization, participation, and awareness. 

References

1. 1. Larousse Petit Dictionnaire Francais, (2015). Culture. Equinox Publishing Group. Vol:14, pp:14000.
2. 2. https://www.livescience.com/21478-what-is-culture-definition-of-culture.html.
3. 3. ILO, (2003). Global Strategy on Occupational Safety and Health, Conclusions Adopted by the International Labour Conference at Its 91st, Session, pp:3-4.
4. 4. Antonsen, S., (2009). Safety Culture: Theory, Method and Improvement, Ashgate Publishing Limited, England.
5. 5. ACSNI, (1993). Human Factors Study Group: Third report - Organising for safety HSE Books, pp:2.
6. 6. IOSH Research Committee, (2009). Safety Culture, Advice and Performance Research Report: 09.1, pp:10-20.
7. 7. Perçin, F. and Haydan, E., (2016). Occupational Health and Safety Education (OHS) and Observation of OHS Culture in USA, Canada, and European Union. National Congress of Ergonomy. Oral Presentation. October 06-08 2016, Denizli (in Turkish).
8. 8. Fleming, M., (2001). Safety Culture Maturation Model HSE Books, pp:3-6.

9. 9. Dupont Türkiye, http://www.dupont.com.tr.
10. 10. ÇSGB, (2010). Ministry of Health and Safety, Report of Cost and Benefit Analyses in Occupational Health and Safety (in Turkish).
11. 11. Perçin, F., Akyol, O., Davas, A., and Saygı, H., (2012). Occupational health of Turkish Aegean Small-Scale Fishermen. Occupational Medicine, 62:148-151.
12. 12. Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, http://www.ccohs.ca/.
13. 13. National Examination Board in Occupational Safety and Health in United Kingdom (NEBOSH system), https://www.nebosh.org.uk/
14. 14. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, https://www.osha.gov/.
15. 15. Perçin, F., (2017). Accidents and Diseases of Fishermen in İzmir Province. In: Fisheries of İzmir Province. Kınacigil, T., Tosunoğlu, Z., Çaklı, Ş., Bey, E., Öztürk, H., Eds., pp:179-187. (ISBN: 978-975-18-0222-4) İzmir Büyükşehir Belediyesi Konak-İzmir (in Turkish).