BibTex RIS Cite

YAPIM Y?LERY GENEL ?ARTNAMESY VE FIDIC KIRMIZI KYTAP YN?AAT Y?LERY GENEL ?ARTNAMESYNDEKY RYSK VE SORUMLULUK DA?ILIMLARININ KANTYTATYF KAR?ILA?TIRILMASI

Year 2010, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 104 - 120, 01.03.2010

Abstract

Bu çaly?mada uluslararasy in?aat projelerinde yaygynlykla kullanylan tip sözle?me metinlerinden FIDIC Kyrmyzy Kitap Genel ?artlary'ndaki ve Türkiye'de kamu in?aat projelerinde kullanylmasy zorunlu olan Yapym Y?leri Genel ?artnamesi'ndeki (YYG?) sorumluluk ve risklerin da?ylymy, proje maliyetine etkileri orijininde kar?yla?tyrylmy?tyr. Bunun için Türkiye Müteahhitler Birli?i üyesi in?aat firmalaryna her iki sözle?me metni için hazyrlanan anketler uygulanmy?tyr. Yüklenici, müteahhit ve mühendisin sorumluluklary ve genel düzenlemelerin proje maliyetine etkisi ara?tyrylmy?tyr. Yapym Y?leri Genel ?artnamesi'nde bulunmayan teknik mü?avirlik müessesesinin FIDIC Kyrmyzy kitapta mühendise hangi sorumluluklary verdi?i incelenmi?tir. Her iki tip sözle?menin kar?yla?tyrylabilmesi için önemli hususlaryn altynyn çizildi?i anahtar diyagramlar olu?turulmu?tur. Çaly?ma bulgularyna göre, Türkiye'de kamu taahhüt i?lerinde çaly?an bir in?aat firmasynyn yüklendi?i sorumluluk ve risklerin (bütünün %66,7'si), FIDIC esasly uluslararasy yapym projelerine göre (bütünün %46,4'ü) önemli miktarda yüksek oldu?u anla?ylmy?tyr.

CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES' AND RISKS' DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS

Year 2010, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 104 - 120, 01.03.2010

Abstract

In this study, the distribution of liabilities and risks in Turkish General Conditions of Construction (GCC) which is mandatory to use for construction projects in Turkey and in FIDIC Red Book General Conditions of Contract which are type contract texts commonly used in international construction projects have been compared in the origin for the effects over the project cost. For this purpose, the questionnaires which have been prepared for both contract texts have been conducted over Turkish Contractors Association member construction companies. The effect of the liabilities of employer, contractor and engineer and the effects of general arrangements over the project cost have been analyzed. The liabilities over the engineer that have been saddled in FIDIC Red Book by the technical consultancy institution that is not available in Turkish General Conditions of Construction have been analyzed. In order to compare both types of contracts, key diagrams have been formed at which the important points have been underlined. According to the findings of the study, it has been understood that the liabilities and risks (66.7% of the whole part) assumed by a construction company which is active in public affairs in Turkey is much higher than the FIDIC basis international construction projects (46.4% of the whole part).

There are 0 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Computer Engineering
Authors

Latif Onur Uğur This is me

Publication Date March 1, 2010
Published in Issue Year 2010 Volume: 5 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Uğur, L. O. (2010). CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES’ AND RISKS’ DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS. Engineering Sciences, 5(2), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.12739/nwsaes.v5i2.5000067079
AMA Uğur LO. CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES’ AND RISKS’ DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS. Engineering Sciences. March 2010;5(2):104-120. doi:10.12739/nwsaes.v5i2.5000067079
Chicago Uğur, Latif Onur. “CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES’ AND RISKS’ DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS”. Engineering Sciences 5, no. 2 (March 2010): 104-20. https://doi.org/10.12739/nwsaes.v5i2.5000067079.
EndNote Uğur LO (March 1, 2010) CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES’ AND RISKS’ DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS. Engineering Sciences 5 2 104–120.
IEEE L. O. Uğur, “CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES’ AND RISKS’ DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS”, Engineering Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 104–120, 2010, doi: 10.12739/nwsaes.v5i2.5000067079.
ISNAD Uğur, Latif Onur. “CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES’ AND RISKS’ DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS”. Engineering Sciences 5/2 (March 2010), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.12739/nwsaes.v5i2.5000067079.
JAMA Uğur LO. CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES’ AND RISKS’ DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS. Engineering Sciences. 2010;5:104–120.
MLA Uğur, Latif Onur. “CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES’ AND RISKS’ DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS”. Engineering Sciences, vol. 5, no. 2, 2010, pp. 104-20, doi:10.12739/nwsaes.v5i2.5000067079.
Vancouver Uğur LO. CANTITATIVE COMPARISON OF RESPONSIBILITIES’ AND RISKS’ DISTRIBUTION BETWEEN TURKISH GENERAL CONDITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND FIDIC RED BOOK GENERAL CONDITIONS. Engineering Sciences. 2010;5(2):104-20.