Orkestra öğrencilerinin bireysel çalışmasına yönelik oluşturulan Kişisel Multimedya Materyali (KMM): Bir eylem araştırması

Abstract

Bu araştırma, müzik eğitimi kurumlarındaki orkestra öğrencilerinin bireysel hazırlık süreçlerinde karşılaştıkları sorunları azaltmak amacıyla Kişisel Multimedya Materyalleri (KMM) geliştirmeyi ve bu materyallerin öğrenci performansı ve çalışma alışkanlıkları üzerindeki etkilerini incelemeyi amaçlamıştır. Nitel bir yöntem olan Eylem Araştırması modeliyle tasarlanan çalışma, Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Müzik Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı’nda “Orkestra-Oda Müziği” dersini alan 13 gönüllü öğrenciyle yürütülmüştür. Uygulama öncesi yapılan durum tespitinde, öğrencilerin orkestra dersine hazırlık çalışmalarında motivasyon eksikliği, teknik beceri farklılıkları, müziksel tatmin sağlayamama ve eser bütünlüğünü kavrayamama gibi sorunlar yaşadığı belirlenmiştir. Bu sorunlara çözüm olarak, aşamalandırılmış sesli video dosyaları içeren KMM geliştirilmiş ve öğrencilerin bireysel çalışmalarında kullanması sağlanmıştır. Uygulama sürecinde öğrencilerden alınan geri bildirimler doğrultusunda materyaller iyileştirilmiş ve yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmelerle veriler toplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular, KMM’nin öğrencilerde deşifre hızını artırdığını, entonasyon ve tempoya uyum becerilerini geliştirdiğini ve müziksel dinamikleri daha etkili uygulamalarını sağladığını göstermiştir. Ayrıca, materyallerin motivasyon, konsantrasyon ve müziksel tatmin düzeylerinde anlamlı bir artışa katkıda bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Öğrenciler, özellikle nota takip imleci ve diğer partileri duyma imkânı gibi özelliklerin çalışma verimliliğini artırdığını vurgulamıştır. Bu çalışma, teknolojinin müzik eğitimine entegrasyonunun öğrenci performansını ve öğrenme deneyimini zenginleştirdiğini kanıtlamaktadır. Gelecek araştırmalarda, KMM’nin farklı çalgı grupları ve uzun vadeli etkileri üzerine odaklanılması önerilmektedir. Ayrıca, ulusal bir multimedya kütüphanesi oluşturulması ve müzik eğitimcilerine yönelik teknoloji entegrasyonu eğitimleri düzenlenmesi, alandaki eksikliklerin giderilmesine katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

• orkestra eğitimi
• multimedya materyalleri
• eylem araştırması
• müzik teknolojisi
• bireysel çalışma

Personal Multimedia Material (PMM) created for the individual study of orchestra students: An action research

Abstract

This study aimed to develop Personal Multimedia Materials (PMMs) to reduce the problems faced by orchestra students in music education institutions in their individual preparation processes and to examine the effects of these materials on student performance and study habits. The study, which was designed with the Action Research model, a qualitative method, was conducted with 13 volunteer students taking the “Orchestra-Room Music” course at Niğde Ömer Halisdemir University, Department of Music Education. In the situation analysis conducted before the implementation, it was determined that the students had problems such as lack of motivation, technical skill differences, inability to provide musical satisfaction and inability to comprehend the integrity of the work in preparation for the orchestra course. As a solution to these problems, KMM, which includes graded audio video files, was developed and used by the students in their individual studies. During the implementation process, the materials were improved in line with the feedback received from the students and data were collected through semi-structured interviews. The findings showed that KMM increased students’ deciphering speed, improved their intonation and tempo adaptation skills, and enabled them to apply musical dynamics more effectively. It was also found that the materials contributed to a significant increase in motivation, concentration and musical satisfaction. Students were particularly impressed by features such as the note-following cursor and the possibility to hear other parts.

Keywords

• orchestra education
• multimedia materials
• action research
• music technology
• personal study

References

1. Acquilino, A. ve Scavone, G. (2022). Current state and future directions of technologies for music instrument pedagogy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Makale 835609. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.835609
2. Aras, T. ve Temuçin, S. (2022). Logic yazılımının varsayılan EQ eklentisi ile harici EQ eklentilerinin ses sinyaline olan etkilerinin karşılaştırılması. Eurasian Journal of Music and Dance, (21), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.31722/ejmd.998995
3. Audio Modeling. (t.y.). SWAM Flute (Sürüm 3.7) [Bilgisayar yazılımı]. https://audiomodeling.com/swam-engine/swam-flute/
4. Avanzini, F., Ludovico, L. A., Mandanici, M., Manzo, M. ve Zattini, F. (2020). A multidimensional taxonomy of digital learning materials for music education. L. Daniela (Ed.), Didactics of smart pedagogy: Smart pedagogy for technology enhanced learning içinde (s. 91-101). Springer.
5. Beyhan, A. (2013). Eğitim örgütlerinde eylem araştırması. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 1(2), 65-89. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/jcer/issue/18614/196496
6. Blackmagic Design Pty Ltd. (t.y.). DaVinci Resolve (Sürüm 19) [Bilgisayar yazılımı]. https://www.blackmagicdesign.com/products/davinciresolve/
7. Blanco, A. D., Tassani, S. ve Ramirez, R. (2021). Real-time sound and motion feedback for violin bow technique learning: A controlled, randomized trial. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Makale 648479. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648479
8. Brandler, B. ve Peynircioğlu, Z. F. (2015). A comparison of the efficacy of individual and collaborative music learning in ensemble rehearsals. Journal of Research in Music Education, 63(3), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429415597885

9. Butz, K. (2019). Achieving musical success in the string classroom. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190602888.001.0001
10. Chong, H. J. ve Kim, S. J. (2016). Development of a school orchestra model in Korean public schools and students’ perceptions of the orchestra experience. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 17(35), 1-22. http://www.ijea.org/v17n35/
11. Cinematic Studio Series. (t.y.). Cinematic Studio Strings (Sürüm 1.7) [Sample kütüphanesi]. https://www.cinematicstudioseries.com/strings/
12. Cuervo, L., Bonastre, C. ve García, D. (2022). Tecnología digital en la educación musical infantil. Praxis & Saber, 13(32), e13201. https://doi.org/10.19053/22160159.v13.n32.2022.13201
13. Daniela, L. ve Lytras, M. (2018). Educational robotics for inclusive education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 24, 219-225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9397-5
14. Delikara, A. (2017). Yaylı çalgı öğrencilerinin orkestra/oda müziği dersine ilişkin görüşleri. 1. Uluslararası İpekyolu Akademik Çalışmalar Sempozyumu içinde (s. 18-25). Nevşehir.
15. Deliyannis, I., Özarslan, Y., Toulis, I., Longo, R., Emmanouil, M. ve Mylonas, N. (2024). Navigating digital frontiers in music education: The MUSENSE Project’s contribution to e-learning. European Journal of Contemporary Education and E-Learning, 2(2), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(2).05
16. Demirtaş, E., ve Eroğlu, T. (2020). Materyal geliştirmede ses kayıt ve düzenleme programlarının kullanımına yönelik öğrenci görüşleri [Özel sayı]. Atatürk Üniversitesi Güzel Sanatlar Enstitüsü Dergisi, 26, 314-326. https://doi.org/10.32547/ataunigsed.620641
17. Fischer, V. (2015). Case study: Performing band rehearsals on the internet with Jamulus. https://jamulus.io/PerformingBandRehearsalsontheInternetWithJamulus.pdf
18. Fonseca, A. (2023). The phenomenon of orchestral practice: Implications for student motivation and learning-Teachers’ point of view. 17th International Technology, Education and Development Conference. IATED. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2023.1994
19. Fu, Q. (2021). Research on the use of computer music in modern musical composition. Journal of Physics Conference Series, 1820(1), 12153. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1820/1/012153
20. Giraldo, S., Waddell, G., Nou, I., Ortega, A., Perez, A., Williamon, A. ve Ramirez, R. (2019). Automatic assessment of tone quality in violin music performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Makale 334. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00334
21. Gorbunova, I. B., Plotnikov, K. J. ve Heiner, H. (2020). Music computer technologies as an integrative networking educational environment. Praxis.EDU, 16(37), 483-495. https://doi.org/10.22481/PRAXISEDU.V16I37.6433
22. Gök, M. (2019). Müzik öğretmeni yetiştiren kurumlarda orkestra/oda müziği eğitim sürecinin öğretim elemanları görüşleri doğrultusunda incelenmesi (Tez No. 617181) [Yüksek lisans tezi, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi]. Yükseköğretim Kurumu Ulusal Tez Merkezi.
23. Gül, G. (2023). Use of technology-supported educational tools in general music education and its contribution to the process of music education. Acta Educationis Generalis, 13(2), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2023-0014
24. Horverak, M. O. (2023). Strategies to succeed with inclusion in a diverse learning environment. IAFOR Journal of Education, 11(3), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.11.3.01
25. Huanhuan, L. (2009). Computer assisted music instrument tutoring applied to violin practice [Doktora tezi, National University of Singapore]. https://www.comp.nus.edu.sg/~leowwk/thesis/luhuanhuan.pdf
26. iZotope, Inc. (t.y.). Ozone Advanced (Sürüm 11.2.0) [Bilgisayar yazılımı]. https://www.izotope.com/en/products/ozone.html
27. Juntunen, P. (2011). Music technology promoting violin and string instrument instruction. CFMAE: Interdisciplinary Journal for Music and Art Pedagogy, 3, 17-34.
28. Juntunen, P. (2016). Enjoy playing! Introducing a new technology-based together playing approach to complement traditional teaching in music schools. A study of an audio supported practice aid for first and second grade string instrument students [Doktora tezi, University of Helsinki]. https://core.ac.uk/download/43338615.pdf
29. Juntunen, P., Ruokonen, I. ve Ruismäki, H. (2013). Study of the potential of Playback Orchestra computer assisted teaching method. The European Journal of Social & Behavioral Sciences, VI(VI), 1097-1104. https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.86
30. Juntunen, P., Ruokonen, I. ve Ruismäki, H. (2015). The music behind the scores: A case study of learning improvisation with the Playback Orchestra method. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 582-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12098
31. Kakimova, L., Sydykova, R., Akhmetova, A., Taubaldiyeva, Zh. ve Zhakaeva, S. (2024). The use of modern digital technologies in the training of future music teachers. Scientific Herald of Uzhhorod University Series “Physics”, (56), 2150-2159. https://doi.org/10.24144/2415-8038.2024.56.2150-2159
32. Kaleli, Y. S. (2020). The effect of computer-assisted instruction on piano education: An experimental study with pre-service music teachers. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 4(3), 235-246. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i3.115
33. Karkina, S., Faizrakhmanova, L., Kamalova, I., Akbarova, G. ve Kaur, B. (2022). Performance practice in a pandemic: Training ensemble skills using E-Tivities in music teacher education. Frontiers in Education, 7, Makale 817310. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.817310
34. Kim, E., Kang, H. ve Kim, Y. (2014). Music technology-mediated teaching and learning approach for music education: A case study from an elementary school in South Korea. International Journal of Music Education, 31(4), 414-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/0255761412473126
35. Ma, E. (2022). Research on the teaching innovation model of the integration of information technology and music education. MATEC Web of Conferences, 365, Makale 1054. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202236501054
36. MakeMusic, Inc. (t.y.). Finale (Sürüm 27.4.1) [Bilgisayar yazılımı]. https://www.finalemusic.com/
37. Martyniuk, L. V., Saldan, S. O., Denysenko, A. O., Oronovska, L. D. ve Leshchuk, N. R. (2024). Use of innovative information technologies in music lessons. Scientific Collection “InterConf”, (83), 861-875. https://doi.org/10.59324/interconf.2024.83.861-875
38. Michałko, A., Campo, A., Nijs, L., Leman, M. ve Van Dyck, E. (2022). Toward a meaningful technology for instrumental music education: Teachers’ voice. Frontiers in Education, 7, Makale 1027042. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1027042
39. Mikhailova, А. K. (2024). Action research as a way to transform teachers’ beliefs about the usage of digital tools in the classroom. Educational Studies Moscow, 2. https://doi.org/10.17323/vo-2024-16663
40. Nart, S. (2016). Music software in the technology integrated music education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 15, 78-84. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1096456.pdf
41. Native Instruments GmbH. (t.y.). Kontakt (Sürüm 8.4.0) [Bilgisayar yazılımı]. https://www.native-instruments.com/en/products/komplete/samplers/kontakt-8/
42. Nor, M. M. ve Ilias, K. (2013). Practice teaching and learning using interactive multimedia innovation for non-optional teachers teaching in music educations. Academic Research International, 4(2), 338. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20133282758
43. Novikov, O. A. (2016). Simulator for training orchestra member in his/her part (Patent No. RU 2 599 244 C2). Russia.
44. Okay, H. H. (2021). Turkish instrument educators’ distance education experiences related to instrument training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Cypriot Journal of Educational Science, 13(2), 201-222. https://doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v13i2.5690
45. Olmos, A., Bouillot, N., Knight, T. A., Mabire, N., Redel, J. ve Cooperstock, J. R. (2012). A high-fidelity orchestra simulator for individual musicians’ practice. Computer Music Journal, 36(2), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1162/COMJ_A_00119
46. Orbanić, S. ve Duraković, L. (2011). The influence of educational technology on the development of music students’ competences. Croatian Journal of Education-Hrvatski Časopis Za Odgoj i Obrazovanje, 13(2), 124-160. https://hrcak.srce.hr/76348
47. Öz, N. B. (2001). Müzik öğretmeni yetiştiren kurumlarda orkestra-oda müziği eğitiminde yaylıçalgıların yeri ve önemi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14, 65-74. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/uefad/issue/16598/172786
48. Rahdianando, G. ve Permana, F. S. (2022). Innovating musical composition through urban noise: A case study in experimental sound. Interlude, 2(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.17509/interlude.v2i1.68154
49. Ramírez, R., Canepa, C., Ghisio, S., Kolykhalova, K. ve Mancini, M. (2018). Enhancing music learning with smart technologies. A. Camurri, G. Volpe, M. Mancini, R. Niewiadomski ve S. Piana (Ed.), 5th International Conference on Movement and Computing, Proceedings içinde (s. 49). Association for Computer Machinery.
50. Rexhepi, F. G., Breznica, R. K. ve Rexhepi, B. R. (2024). Evaluating the effectiveness of using digital technologies in music education. Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 17(1), Makale 273. https://doi.org/10.18785/jetde.1701.16
51. Schnerer, K. ve Hopkins, M. E. (2021). Motivating orchestra students during the pandemic. American String Teacher, 71(1), Makale 11. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003131320977358
52. Steinberg Media Technologies GmbH. (t.y.). Cubase Pro (Sürüm 14.0.30) [Bilgisayar yazılımı]. https://www.steinberg.net/cubase/
53. Sternbach, D. (2008). Stress in the lives of music students. Music Educators Journal, 94(3), 42-48. https://doi.org/10.1177/002743210809400309
54. Sularso, S., Yu, Q., Pranolo, A. ve Hardiyanti, P. C. (2024). Advancing computer science in education: Integrating digital music technology into elementary school music programs. E3S Web of Conferences, 501, Makale 01019. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202450101019
55. Şen, Ç., Şen, E., Kurtaslan, Z. ve Aydın, B. (2019). Müzik eğitimi anabilim dallarında orkestra/oda müziği dersi kapsamında hazırlanan konser repertuvarlarının incelenmesi. Ekev Akademi Dergisi, 23(79), 69-82. https://acikerisim.sinop.edu.tr/items/bf6f7c14-b3ce-44a5-8981-b17b6e073720
56. Upitis, R., Abrami, P. C., Varela, W., King, M. ve Brook, J. (2017). Student experiences with studio instruction. Music Education Research, 19(4), 410-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2016.1202221
57. Varış, Y. A. (2016). Orkestra/oda müziği dersinin müzik öğretmeni yetiştirme sürecindeki yeri ve önemi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 16, 2504-2520.
58. Vastamäki, M., Heliövaara, M., Vastamäki, H. ve Ristolainen, L. (2022). Orchestra musicians’ work environment and health versus general workforce. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65(4), 344-348. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000002763
59. Waddell, G. ve Williamon, A. (2019). Technology use and attitudes in music learning. Frontiers in ICT, 6, Makale 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2019.00011
60. Wang, C. (2017). Exploring integration mechanism of music instructional design and education informatization. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems, 10, Makale e14. https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.3945
61. Wu, N. (2021). JamNSync: A user-friendly, latency-agnostic virtual rehearsal platform for music ensembles [Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology]. https://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/139045
62. Zhamelov, B. A., Baitureev, D. ve Kulanova, F. (2024). Opportunities for developing a teacher’s professional pedagogical competence through the use of the “action research” method in history lessons. Bulletin of Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University. Series of Historical and Socio-Political Sciences, 80(1), 232-239. https://doi.org/10.51889/2959-6017.2024.80.1.025