WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT

Number: 8 November 1, 2003
  • Mark Wılson
TR EN

WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT

Abstract

R. Wallace and W. Williams in their recent volume The Three Worlds of Paul of Tarsus (Tarsuslu Pavlus’un Üç Dünyas›) assert that Paul as a citizen of Tarsus “need ever have visited the city, much less lived there.” This, they assert, is based on the fact that ancient civic citizenship passed through descent and not through domicile. Further, Paul’s return to Tarsus following his conversion suggests “only that some of the family still lived there, rather than it was Paul’s home town.” They conclude that attempts to develop a formative Tarsian context for Paul’s character and teaching “are built on insecure foundations.”1 This controversial claim runs counter to most biblical and classical scholarship as it relates to the background of the apostle Paul. In fact, as Riesner notes, “It is striking in the larger sense how seldom this bit of Lukan information has been doubted by skeptical scholarship.”2 If true, it would significantly diminish the historical connection between Paul and Tarsus of Cilicia as one of its most famous native sons. This paper will seek to reassess Paul’s connection to Tarsus and Cilicia in light of the comments by Wallace and Williams. In responding to their claims, we will first review the relevant biblical and historical background related to Paul’s three worlds

References

  1. Broughton 1938 Broughton, T.R.S., “Roman Asia Minor” in An Economic Survey of Ancient Rome, ed. T. Frank, Baltimore Dueck 2000 Dueck, D., Strabo of Amasia, New York
  2. Ehrenberg 1969 Ehrenberg, V., The Greek State, London
  3. Hachlili 1994 Hachlili, R., “Synagogues, Diaspora Synagogues” in Anchor Bible Dictionary, ed. D. N. Friedman, Garden City
  4. Hachlili 1998 Hachlili, R., Ancient Jewish Art and Archaeology in the Diaspora, Leiden
  5. Hengel 1991 Hengel, M., The Pre-Christian Paul, London
  6. Hengel – Schwemer 1997 Hengel, M. – Schwemer, A.M., Paul Between Damascus and Antioch: The Unknown Years, Louisville
  7. Hill 1996 Hill, S., Early Byzantine Churches of Cilicia and Isauria, Brookfield
  8. Horsley 1982 Horsley, G.H.R., New Documents Illustrating Early Christianity, North Ryde

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Mark Wılson This is me

Publication Date

November 1, 2003

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2003 Number: 8

APA
Wılson, M. (2003). WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT. OLBA, 8, 87-108. https://izlik.org/JA78XT98AE
AMA
1.Wılson M. WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT. OLBA. 2003;(8):87-108. https://izlik.org/JA78XT98AE
Chicago
Wılson, Mark. 2003. “WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT”. OLBA, nos. 8: 87-108. https://izlik.org/JA78XT98AE.
EndNote
Wılson M (November 1, 2003) WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT. OLBA 8 87–108.
IEEE
[1]M. Wılson, “WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT”, OLBA, no. 8, pp. 87–108, Nov. 2003, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA78XT98AE
ISNAD
Wılson, Mark. “WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT”. OLBA. 8 (November 1, 2003): 87-108. https://izlik.org/JA78XT98AE.
JAMA
1.Wılson M. WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT. OLBA. 2003;:87–108.
MLA
Wılson, Mark. “WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT”. OLBA, no. 8, Nov. 2003, pp. 87-108, https://izlik.org/JA78XT98AE.
Vancouver
1.Mark Wılson. WAS PAUL A CILICIAN, A NATIVE OF TARSUS? A HISTORICAL REASSESSMENT. OLBA [Internet]. 2003 Nov. 1;(8):87-108. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA78XT98AE