Research Article

CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Volume: 39 Number: 3 August 30, 2022
EN

CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE

Abstract

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has grown in popularity since its introduction and has become the gold standard surgical method for the treatment of cholelithiasis. It has several advantages over open surgery, including less postoperative pain, a shorter hospital stay, a faster return to normal activities, and bettercosmetic results. Converting from laparoscopic to open surgery may be necessary in some cases, either to prevent or treat difficulties. The current conversion rate from laparoscopic to open surgery is between 2 and 15%. Open surgery may be required due to advanced age, male gender, acute cholecystitis, anatomicalalterations of the gallbladder or biliary system, obesity, bleeding, adhesions, and biliary tract injuries. The purpose of our study was to determine the risk factors that influencethe conversion to open surgery.Between January 2018 and December 2021, 921 cholecystectomy cases were analyzed retrospectively at the Recep Tayyip Erdogan University Training and Research Hospital. Twenty-three of thesepatients were removed from the study once it was revealed that they had undergone direct open surgery or an open cholecystectomy while undergoing another operation. There were 28 patients in the study who had a laparoscopic cholecystectomy but had to convert to open surgery due to difficulties. The demographic and clinicalinformation about the patients was obtained from hospital records. By comparing the data of an equal number of randomlyselected patients from laparoscopic completed patients, it was assessed if these features had a significant effect on the conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery.The most common reason for conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy was adhesion due to inflammation, which accounted for 3.04 percent of conversions. In our study, cholecystitis symptomsincludingnumerous calculi on ultrasonography and increased wall thickness, as well as raised GGT and ALP levels, all affected the decision to convert to open surgery. There were no significant associationsdiscovered between gender, pancreatitis, cholangitis, stone size, and ASA score. The duration of hospitalization was found to be considerably longer in the group that converted to open surgery.Increased rates of conversion to open surgery are associated with advanced age, obesity, previous episodes of cholecystitis, adhesions due to previous abdominal incisions, presence of cholecystitis findings such as multiple calculi on ultrasonography and increased wall thickness, and high GGT and ALP values. The most effective factor in converting to open surgery appears to be having previously had cholecystitis. Preoperative patient examination can aid in predicting the risk of exposure.

Keywords

References

  1. 1- Soper, Nathaniel J., L. Michael Brunt, and Kurt Kerbl. "Laparoscopic general surgery." New England Journal of Medicine 330.6 (1994): 409-419.
  2. 2- Sutcliffe R, Hollyman M, Hodson J, et al. Preoperative risk factors for conversion from laparoscopic to opencholecystectomy: a validated risk scorederived from a prospective U.K. database of 8820 patientsHPB (Oxford). 2016 Nov; 18(11): 922–928
  3. 3- Acehan, Turker, and Emin Kose. "Risk Factors Effecting Conversion from Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Surgery/Kolesistektomi Esnasinda Laparoskopik Cerrahiden Acik Cerrahiye Gecisi Etkileyen Risk Faktorleri." Bagcilar Medical Bulletin 6.3 (2021): 280-287.
  4. 4- Litwin, Demetrius EM, and Mitchell A. Cahan."Laparoscopic cholecystectomy." Surgical Clinics of North America 88.6 (2008): 1295-1313.
  5. 5- Ekici Uğur, Faik Tatlı, and Murat Kanlıöz. "Preoperative and postoperative risk factors in laparoscopic cholecystectomy converted to opensurgery." Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine 28.7 (2019): 857-860.
  6. 6- Beksac K, Turhan N, Karaagaoglu E. Risk Factors for Conversion of LaparoscopicCholecystectomy to Open Surgery: A New Predictive Statistical Model, J of Lap & Adv SurgTechVol. 26, Num 9, 2016.
  7. 7- DiBuono, G., Romano, G., Galia, M. et al. Difficult laparoscopiccholecystectomy and preoperativepredictivefactors. SciRep 11, 2559 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81938-6
  8. 8- Gupta N, Ranjan G, Arora MP, Goswami B, Chaudhary P, Kapur A, et al. Validation of a scoring system to predict difficult laparoscopiccholecystectomy. Int J Surg 2013;11(9):1002-1006.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

August 30, 2022

Submission Date

March 29, 2022

Acceptance Date

June 30, 2022

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 39 Number: 3

APA
Özdemir, A., Karakaya, A., & Pergel, A. (2022). CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 39(3), 781-785. https://izlik.org/JA33WZ48FB
AMA
1.Özdemir A, Karakaya A, Pergel A. CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2022;39(3):781-785. https://izlik.org/JA33WZ48FB
Chicago
Özdemir, Ali, Ahmet Karakaya, and Ahmet Pergel. 2022. “CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 39 (3): 781-85. https://izlik.org/JA33WZ48FB.
EndNote
Özdemir A, Karakaya A, Pergel A (August 1, 2022) CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 39 3 781–785.
IEEE
[1]A. Özdemir, A. Karakaya, and A. Pergel, “CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 781–785, Aug. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA33WZ48FB
ISNAD
Özdemir, Ali - Karakaya, Ahmet - Pergel, Ahmet. “CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE”. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 39/3 (August 1, 2022): 781-785. https://izlik.org/JA33WZ48FB.
JAMA
1.Özdemir A, Karakaya A, Pergel A. CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2022;39:781–785.
MLA
Özdemir, Ali, et al. “CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 39, no. 3, Aug. 2022, pp. 781-5, https://izlik.org/JA33WZ48FB.
Vancouver
1.Ali Özdemir, Ahmet Karakaya, Ahmet Pergel. CONVERSION FROM LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY TO OPEN SURGERY: REASONS AND POSSIBLE RISKS: A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE. J. Exp. Clin. Med. [Internet]. 2022 Aug. 1;39(3):781-5. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA33WZ48FB