Efficacy of kinesio taping versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy for calcaneal spur

Abstract

The calcaneal spur is a common cause of heel pain, and there are various approaches to its treatment. Our aim in this study is to investigate the effectiveness of kinesio taping against Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of calcaneal spur. This study was designed as a randomized controlled, prospective and single-center clinical trial. A total of 93 patients with calcaneal spur (18 men, 75 women) were included. Patients were divided into two groups (based on gender, age, BMI, and pain duration) by stratified randomization (kinesio tape group=46, ESWT group=47 patients). 3 sessions of ESWT were applied to the heels of the patients in the 1st group with an interval of 1 week. Kinesio taping was applied to the 2nd group. It was applied once a week, for 3 weeks. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) scores of the patients in both groups before the treatment and 1 week after the end of the treatment were recorded. When we evaluated the pre-treatment and post-treatment parameters, we found a significant decrease in VAS, FFI-pain, FFI-disability and FFI-activity restriction scores in both groups (p=0.0001). We also found that kinesio taping was more effective than ESWT in reducing FFI-pain (for after treatment FFI-pain inter group p=0.005, for FFI-pain difference inter group p=0.002) and FFI-disability (for after treatment FFI-disability inter group p=0.023, for FFI-disability difference inter group p=0.0001) scores. To conclude, although both kinesio taping and ESWT treatments reduced patients' pain, disability and activity limitation, kinesio taping was found to be more effective in reducing pain and disability. Studies with longer follow-up are needed to clarify our results.

Keywords

• calcaneal spur
• extracorporeal shock wave therapy
• kinesio tape

References

1. References 1. Yalcin E, Keskin Akca A, Selcuk B, Kurtaran A, Akyuz M. Effects of extracorporal shock wave therapy on symptomatic heel spurs: a correlation between clinical outcome and radiologic changes. Rheumatol Int [Internet]. 2012 Feb 26;32(2):343–7. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00296-010-1622-z
2. 2. Ahmad J, Karim A, Daniel JN. Relationship and Classification of Plantar Heel Spurs in Patients With Plantar Fasciitis. Foot Ankle Int [Internet]. 2016 Sep 20;37(9):994–1000. Available from: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1071100716649925
3. 3. Johal KS, Milner SA. Plantar fasciitis and the calcaneal spur: Fact or fiction? Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2012 Mar;18(1):39–41. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1268773111000385
4. 4. Agyekum EK, Ma K. Heel pain: A systematic review. Chinese J Traumatol [Internet]. 2015 Jun;18(3):164–9. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1008127515000437
5. 5. Tezel N, Umay E, Bulut M, Cakci A. Short-term efficacy of kinesiotaping versus extracorporeal shockwave therapy for plantar fasciitis: A randomized study. Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2020;8(3):181.
6. 6. Ercan S, Demir HM, Baygul Atalay Y, Cetin C. Efficiency of Combined Treatment of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Kinesiotape Application on Patients with Plantar Fasciitis. Turkish J Sport Med [Internet]. 2017 Oct 2;52(3):102–10. Available from: http://www.sporhekimligidergisi.org/eng/abstract/285/eng
7. 7. Çeliker R, Güven Z, Aydoğ T, Bağış S, Atalay A, Yağcı HÇ, et al. Kinezyolojik Bantlama Tekniği ve Uygulama Alanları. Türkiye Fiz Tıp ve Rehabil Derg [Internet]. 2011 Dec 15;57(4):225–35. Available from: http://www.ftrdergisi.com/eng/makale/2935/215/Full-Text
8. 8. Yaliman A, Sen EI, Eskiyurt N, Budiman-Mak E. Turkish Translation and Adaptation of Foot Function Index in Patients with Plantar Fasciitis. Türkiye Fiz Tip ve Rehabil Derg [Internet]. 2014 Sep 4;60(3):212–22. Available from: http://ftrdergisi.com/eng/makale/3717/287/Full-Text

9. 9. Anaforoğlu Külünkoğlu B, Fırat N, Yıldız NT, Alkan A. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Foot Function Index in patients with foot disorders. Turkish J Med Sci [Internet]. 2018 Jun 14;48(3):476–83. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29914240
10. 10. Başdelioğlu K. Radiologic and Demographic Characteristics of Patients With Plantar Calcaneal Spur. J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2021 Jan;60(1):51–4. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1067251620302465
11. 11. Ulusoy A, Cerrahoglu L, Orguc S. Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Clinical Outcomes of Laser Therapy, Ultrasound Therapy, and Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Foot Ankle Surg [Internet]. 2017 Jul;56(4):762–7. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1067251617301321
12. 12. Hayta E, Salk I, Gumus C, Tuncay MS, Cetin A. Extracorporeal shock-wave therapy effectively reduces calcaneal spur length and spur-related pain in overweight and obese patients. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil [Internet]. 2016 Dec 20;30(1):17–22. Available from: https://www.medra.org/servlet/aliasResolver?alias=iospress&doi=10.3233/BMR-160708
13. 13. Krukowska J, Wrona J, Sienkiewicz M, Czernicki J. A comparative analysis of analgesic efficacy of ultrasound and shock wave therapy in the treatment of patients with inflammation of the attachment of the plantar fascia in the course of calcaneal spurs. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg [Internet]. 2016 Sep 11;136(9):1289–96. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00402-016-2503-z
14. 14. Tengku Yusof TNB, Seow D, Vig KS. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy for Foot and Ankle Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc [Internet]. 2022 Feb 25;1–26. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34878537
15. 15. Notarnicola A, Maccagnano G, Moretti L, Farì G, Bianchi FP, Working Group SWCB, et al. Could the presence of heel spur be a prognostic factor for outcome of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for plantar fasciitis? J Biol Regul Homeost Agents [Internet]. 33(6):1949–54. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31939270
16. 16. Auersperg V, Trieb K. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: an update. EFORT Open Rev [Internet]. 2020 Oct;5(10):584–92. Available from: https://eor.bioscientifica.com/view/journals/eor/5/10/2058-5241.5.190067.xml
17. 17. Badil Güloğlu S, Yalçın Ü. Comparison of effects of low-level laser therapy and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in calcaneal spur treatment: A prospective, randomized, clinical study. Turkish J Phys Med Rehabil [Internet]. 2021 May 25;67(2):218–24. Available from: http://www.ftrdergisi.com/uploads/pdf/pdf_4292.pdf
18. 18. Kuyucu E, Gülenç B, Biçer H, Erdil M. Assessment of the kinesiotherapy’s efficacy in male athletes with calcaneal apophysitis. J Orthop Surg Res [Internet]. 2017 Oct 6;12(1):146. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28985751
19. 19. Nunes GS, Feldkircher JM, Tessarin BM, Bender PU, da Luz CM, de Noronha M. Kinesio taping does not improve ankle functional or performance in people with or without ankle injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil [Internet]. 2021 Feb;35(2):182–99. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081510
20. 20. Morris D, Jones D, Ryan H, Ryan CG. The clinical effects of Kinesio ® Tex taping: A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract [Internet]. 2013 May 22;29(4):259–70. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/09593985.2012.731675
21. 21. Halseth T, McChesney JW, Debeliso M, Vaughn R, Lien J. The effects of kinesioTM taping on proprioception at the ankle. J Sports Sci Med [Internet]. 2004 Mar;3(1):1–7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24497814
22. 22. Williams S, Whatman C, Hume PA, Sheerin K. Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries: a meta-analysis of the evidence for its effectiveness. Sports Med [Internet]. 2012 Feb 1;42(2):153–64. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22124445