Research Article

Evaluation of surgical treatment of pressure sore patients: 30 years of experience

Volume: 42 Number: 3 September 30, 2025
EN

Evaluation of surgical treatment of pressure sore patients: 30 years of experience

Abstract

Pressure sores develop as a result of continuous or intermittent pressure applied to a localized area, leading to tissue damage. Elderly, frail and long-term bedridden patients constitute a significant risk group. Pressure sores are treated both conservatively and surgically. Between 1993 and 2023, 207 patients and 340 pressure sores were examined in our clinic. The etiology of pressure ulcers, age of the patients, gender distribution, localization of the wounds, flap options, postoperative complications and recurrence rates were evaluated. Of the 207 patients evaluated, 127 (61.3%) were male and 80 (38.6%) were female, with a mean age of 44 years. Of the 340 wounds, 129 (37.4%) were in the sacral region, 92 (27.4%) in the ischial region, 69 (20.2%) in the trochanteric region, and 50 (15%) in other regions. In terms of clinical status, 64% were plegic, while 36% were bedridden (non-plegic). Our primary treatment options included the gluteus maximus fasciocutaneous flap for sacral pressure wounds, the inferior gluteus maximus island flap for ischial pressure wounds, and the tensor fascia lata flap for trochanteric pressure wounds. However, the recent introduction of perforator flaps has expanded the range of surgical options available in our clinical approach to pressure sores. Recently, perforator flap techniques—such as propeller flaps and SGAP flaps—have been introduced into our practice for pressure ulcer reconstruction. The most common complication in early postoperative follow-up was suture line separation (7.0%). There was no difference in complication rates between fasciocutane, musculocutaneous or perforator flaps applied in the surgery of pressure ulcers.

Keywords

References

  1. Akbas H, Uysal A. Bası yaralı olgularda tedavi yaklaşımlarımız ve sonuçlarımız. Turk Plast Rekonstr Aesthet Surg. 2001;9(2):106-9.
  2. Thompson RJ. Pathological changes in mummies. Proc R Soc Med. 1961;54:409.
  3. Enis J, Sarmiento A. The pathophysiology and management of pressure sores. Orthop Rev. 1973;2:26.
  4. Munro D. Care of back following spinal-cord injuries. N Engl J Med. 1940;223:391.
  5. National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel, European Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel. Pressure ulcer treatment recommendations. In: Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline. Washington (DC): National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009. p.51-120.
  6. Edberg EL, Cerny K, Stauffer ES. Prevention and treatment of pressure sores. Phys Ther. 1973;53:246.
  7. Dansereau JG, Conway H. Closure of decubiti in paraplegics. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1964;33:474.
  8. Kierney PC, Engrav LH, Isik FF, Esselman PC, Cardenas DD, Rand RP. Result of 268 pressure sores in 158 patients managed jointly by plastic surgery and rehabilitation medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:765-72.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

September 30, 2025

Submission Date

April 18, 2025

Acceptance Date

May 3, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 42 Number: 3

APA
Demir, A., Selamioğlu, E., Altundağ, İ., Ocak, M. S., & Göztepe, M. B. (2025). Evaluation of surgical treatment of pressure sore patients: 30 years of experience. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 42(3), 308-313. https://izlik.org/JA59CD85FS
AMA
1.Demir A, Selamioğlu E, Altundağ İ, Ocak MS, Göztepe MB. Evaluation of surgical treatment of pressure sore patients: 30 years of experience. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2025;42(3):308-313. https://izlik.org/JA59CD85FS
Chicago
Demir, Ahmet, Engin Selamioğlu, İlker Altundağ, Mustafa Sertaç Ocak, and Mehmet Berke Göztepe. 2025. “Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Pressure Sore Patients: 30 Years of Experience”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 42 (3): 308-13. https://izlik.org/JA59CD85FS.
EndNote
Demir A, Selamioğlu E, Altundağ İ, Ocak MS, Göztepe MB (September 1, 2025) Evaluation of surgical treatment of pressure sore patients: 30 years of experience. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 42 3 308–313.
IEEE
[1]A. Demir, E. Selamioğlu, İ. Altundağ, M. S. Ocak, and M. B. Göztepe, “Evaluation of surgical treatment of pressure sore patients: 30 years of experience”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 308–313, Sept. 2025, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA59CD85FS
ISNAD
Demir, Ahmet - Selamioğlu, Engin - Altundağ, İlker - Ocak, Mustafa Sertaç - Göztepe, Mehmet Berke. “Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Pressure Sore Patients: 30 Years of Experience”. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 42/3 (September 1, 2025): 308-313. https://izlik.org/JA59CD85FS.
JAMA
1.Demir A, Selamioğlu E, Altundağ İ, Ocak MS, Göztepe MB. Evaluation of surgical treatment of pressure sore patients: 30 years of experience. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2025;42:308–313.
MLA
Demir, Ahmet, et al. “Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Pressure Sore Patients: 30 Years of Experience”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 42, no. 3, Sept. 2025, pp. 308-13, https://izlik.org/JA59CD85FS.
Vancouver
1.Ahmet Demir, Engin Selamioğlu, İlker Altundağ, Mustafa Sertaç Ocak, Mehmet Berke Göztepe. Evaluation of surgical treatment of pressure sore patients: 30 years of experience. J. Exp. Clin. Med. [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 1;42(3):308-13. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA59CD85FS