Topikal Negatif Basınç (TNB) Uygulama Alanları Ve Etki Mekanizmaları

Abstract

Topical Negative Pressure (TNP): Fields of Applications and Mechanisms of Effect Topical negative pressure (TNP) application is recognized as a valid method to accelerate wound healing process and has been put to active clinical use for the last 15 years. This method incorporates the application of sub atmospheric pressure to a wound in a localized and controlled manner. The device which imposes topical negative pressure, the V.A.C. system (Vacuum Assisted Closure-Kinetic Concept Inc. USA) is being used for our patients by the chronic wound treatment center of our clinic for two years. Shrinkage of wound area, decreased local edema, and increased granulation tissue formation were observed in the lesions treated with TNP. These results have confirmed that, TNP application has become an effective tool for preoperative wound preparation in our clinic. The present study, we reviewed the use and means of benefit of TNP application in our clinic for the last two years were reviewed. Topikal negatif basınç (TNB) uygulaması; akut ve kronik yaralarda son 15 yıldır yaygın olarak kullanılan ve yara iyileşmesini hızlandıran geçerli bir yöntemdir. Bu yöntemde yaraya belli sürelerle kontrollü ve lokalize atmosfer altı basınç uygulanır. Topikal negatif basınç sağlayan V.A.C sistemi (Vacuum Assisted Closure-Kinetic Concept Inc. USA), son iki yıldır bölümümüz Kronik Yara Merkezi tarafından hastalarımıza uygulanmaktadır. TNB ile tedavi edilen lezyonlarda, yara alanlarında küçülme, lokal yara ödeminde azalma ve granülasyon dokusu oluşumunda artış gözlendi. Bu sonuçlar TNB uygulamasının yarayı ameliyata hazırlama amacıyla kullanılan etkili bir seçenek olduğunu doğrulamıştır. Kliniğimizde de son iki yıldır kullanılan TNB sağlayan V.A.C sisteminin kullanımı ve etki mekanizmaları gözden geçirilmiştir.

Keywords

• -

References

1. Morykwas MJ, Argenta LC, Shelton-Brown EI et al. Vacuum-assisted closure: a new method for wound control and treatment: animal studies and basic f o u n d a t i o n . Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 553–562.
2. Fleischmann W, Strecker W, Bombelli M et al. Vacuum sealing as a treatment of soft tissue damage in open fractures. Unfallchirurg 1993; 99: 488–492.
3. Argenta LC, and Morkwas MJ. Vacuum-assisted c l o s u r e : a new method for wound control and treatment: clinical experience. Ann Plast Surg 1997; 38: 563–576.
4. Timmers M S, Cesseie S, Banwell P et al. The effects of varying degrees of pressure delivered by negativepressure wound therapy on skin perfusion. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55: 665–671.
5. Demir A, Demirtafl Y, Çifci M ve ark. Topikal negatif bas›nç (vakum yard›ml› kapama [VAC]) uygulamalar›m›z. Türk Plast Rekonstr Est Cer Derg. 2006; 14: 171–177.
6. Venturi ML, Attinger CE, Mesbahi AN et al. Mechanisms and clinical applications of the vacuumassisted closure Device. Am J Clin Dermatol 2006; 6: 185–194.
7. Chen SZ, Li J, Li XY et al. Effects of vacuum-assisted closure on wound microcirculation: An experimental study. Asian J Surg 2005; 28: 211–217
8. Josef E, Hamori C, Bergman S et al. A prospective randomized trial of vacuum-assisted closure versus standard therapy of chronic nonhealing wounds. Wounds 2000; 12: 60–67.

9. Schneider AM, Morykwas M J, and Argenta LC. New and reliable method of securing skin grafts to the difficult recipient bed. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1195–1198.
10. Genecov DG, Schneider AM, Morykwas MJ et al. A controlled subatmospheric pressure dressing increases the rate of skin graft donor site reepithelialization. Ann Plast Surg 1998; 40: 219–225.
11. Greer SE, Longaker MT, Margiotta M et al. The use of subatmospheric pressure dressing for the coverage of radial forearm free flap donor-site exposed tendon complications. Ann Plast Surg 1999; 43: 551–554
12. Caniono DA, Ruth B, Teich S. Wound management with vacuum-assisted closure: experience in 51 pediatric patients. J Ped Surg 2005; 40: 128–132.
13. Armstrong DG, Lavery LA. Negative pressure wound therapy after partial diabetic foot amputation: a m u l t i c e n t r e , randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005; 366: 1704–1710.
14. Varker KA and Ng T. Management of Empyema cavity with the Vacuum-Assisted Closure Device. Ann. Thorac. Surg 2006; 81: 723–725.
15. Stoeckel WT, David L, Levine EA et al. Vacuum-assisted closure for the treatment of complex breast wounds. Breast 2006; 15: 610–613.
16. Paul JC. Vacuum Assisted Closure Therapy: A Must in Plastic Surgery. Plast Surg Nurs 2005; 25: 61–65.
17. Eastman SM. Vacuum assisted closure advanced therapy system troubleshooting guide. Plast Surg Nurs 2006; 26: 37–39.
18. Heler L, Levin SL, Butler CE. Management of abdominal wound dehiscence using vacuum assisted closure in patients with compromised healing. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 165–172.
19. Bickels J, Kollender Y, Wittig JC et al. Vacuum-assisted wound closure after resection of musculoskeletal tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 441: 346–350.
20. Taub PJ, Schulman MR, Sett S et al. Revisiting v a s c u l a r i z e d muscle flaps for complicated sternal wounds in children. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55: 535–537.
21. Agarwal JP., Ogilvie M, Wu LC et al. Vacuum-assisted closure for sternal wounds: a first-line therapeutic management approach. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 1035–1040.
22. Cowan KN, Teague L, Sue SC et al. Vacuum-assisted wound closure of deep sternal infections in high-risk patients after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 80: 2205–2212.
23. Fuchs U, Zittermann A, Stuettgen B et al. Clinical outcome of patients with Deep sternal wound infection managed by Vacuum-Assisted Closure compared to conventional therapy with open packing: A Retrospective analysis Ann Thorac Surg 2005; 79: 526–531.
24. Nugent N, Lannon D, O’Donnell M. Vacuum-assisted closure-a management option for the burns patient with exposed bone. Burns 2005; 31: 390–393.
25. Dosluoglu HH, Schimpf DK, and Cherr GS. Preservation of infected and exposed vascular grafts using vacuum assisted closure without muscle flap coverage. J Vasc Surg 2005; 42: 989–992.
26. Ford SJ, Rathinam S, King JE, et al. Tuberculous osteomyelitis of the sternum: Successful management with debridement and vacuum assisted closure Eur J Cardio-thorac Surg 2005; 28: 645–647.
27. Lee AT, Fanton GS, Mc Adams TR. Acute Compartment Syndrome of the thigh in a football Athlete. J. Orthop Trauma 2005; 19: 748–750.
28. Schuster R, Moradzadeh A, Waxman K. The use of vacuum-assisted closure therapy for the treatment of a large ›nfected facial wound. Am Surg 2006; 72: 129–131.
29. Salcedo ZS, Ruiz JC, Cherit JD et al. An approach to the management of necrotising fasciitis in neonates. Int Wound J 2005; 2: 178–180.
30. Etöz A, Özgenel GY, Özcan M. Negatif Bas›nçl› Pansuman Uygulamas›: Klinik Deneyimlerimiz. Türk Plast Rekonstr Est Cer Derg 2004; 12: 102–105.
31. Tachi M, Hirabayashi S, Yonehara Y et al. Topical negative pressure using a drainage pouch without foam dressing for the treatment of undermined pressure ulsers. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 338–342.
32. Niezgoda JA, Cabigas EB, Allen HKet al. Managing pyoderma gangrenosum: A synergistic approach c o m b i n i n g surgical debridement, Vacuum-Assisted Closure and Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006; 117: 24–28.
33. Velde MV and Hudson DA. VADER (Vacuum-Assisted Dermal Recruitment) A new method of wound closure. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55: 660–664.
34. Lambert KV, Hayes P and Mc Carthy M. Vacuum assisted closure: a review of development and current applications. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2005; 29: 219–226.
35. Friedman T, Westreich M and Shalom A. Vacuumassisted closure treatment complicated by anasarca. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 55: 420–421.
36. Norton SE, De Souza B, Marsh D et al. Vacuumassisted closure (VAC theraphy) and the risk of fluid loss in acute trauma. Ann Plast Surg 2006; 56: 194–195.