Research Article

Comparison of the efficiency, side effects and complications of the synthetic dural grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura

Volume: 32 Number: 2 June 25, 2015
EN

Comparison of the efficiency, side effects and complications of the synthetic dural grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare human fibrinogen-thrombin-based liquid dural graft; Beriplast® (Behring, Malburg, Germany) and collagen-based dural graft; Tissudura® (Baxter, Heidelberg, Germany) in terms of efficiency, side effects and complications. Thirty Spraque Dawley rats were used in this experimental study. A burrhole was opened on the left parietal bone of each subject and experimental dural defect was created. While 10 subjects were in sham group without any dural defect repair, dural defect was repaired by Beriplast in 10 subjects, by Tissudura in 10 subjects. After twenty-one day follow-up, edema, gliosis and inflammatory cell infiltration in the parenchyma, foreign body reaction in the bone, fibrosis in the epidural space and dura were evaluated histopathologically. Beriplast caused much more severe inflammation on cortex. When we compared Tissudura group with the sham group in terms of parenchymal edema and gliosis, the difference was not significant. On the other hand, we have found a significant increase in cortical parenchymal edema in Beriplast group. The last generation dural grafts result in different degrees of the tissue reaction. Severe inflammatory reaction can provide more satisfactory results in terms of watertight dural closure but on the other hand, the same reaction can be a disadvantage to the surrounding tissue. 

Keywords

References

  1. Alleyene, H., Cawley, C., Barrow, L., Poff, C., Powell, D., Amarpreet, B.,1998. Efficacy and biocompatibility of a photopolymerized, synthetic, absorbable hydrogel as a dural selant in a canine Craniotomy model. J. Neurosurg. 88, 308-313.
  2. Ayhan, S., Tugay, C., Ortak, T., Prayson, R., Parker, M., Siemionow, M., Papay, F.A., 2002. Effect of bioabsorbable osseous fixation materials on Dura Mater and brain tissue. Plastic Reconstr. Surg. 109, 1333-1338.
  3. Bhatia, S., Bergethon, R., Kemper, T., Rosiello, A., Zimbardi, P., Franzblau, C., Spatz, E.L., 1995. A synthetic dural prothesis constructed from hydroxyethylmethacrylate hydrogels. J. Neurosurg. 83, 897-902.
  4. Cappabianca, P., Esposito, F., Cavallo, M., Messina, A., Solari, D., Somma, M., de Divitiis, E., 2006. Use of equine collagen foil as dura mater substitute in endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal surgery. Surg. Neurol. 65, 144-149.
  5. Chappell, E., Pare, L., Salehpour, M., Mathews, M., Middlehof, C., 2009. GORE PRECLUDE® MVP® dura substitute applied as a nonwatertight ‘underlay’ graft for craniotomies: product and technique evaluation. Surg. Neurol. 71, 126-129.
  6. Dietemann, J., Bernardo, R., Bogorin, A., Eid, M., Koob, M., Nogueira, T., Vargas, M.I., Fakhoury, W., Zöllner, G., 2005. Normal and abnormal meningeal enhancement: MRI features. J. Radiol. 86, 1659-1683.
  7. Dunn, J., Goa, L., 1999. Fibrin sealant: A review of its use in surgery and endoscopy. Drugs 58, 863-886.
  8. Eberhard, U., Broder, M., Witzke, G., 2006. Stability of Beriplast P fibrin sealant: storage and reconstitution. Int. J. Pharm. 313, 1-4.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Hakan Özalp This is me

Ahmet Karkucak This is me

Cengiz Çokluk This is me

Publication Date

June 25, 2015

Submission Date

March 11, 2015

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2015 Volume: 32 Number: 2

APA
Hamzaoğlu, V., Özalp, H., Karkucak, A., & Çokluk, C. (2015). Comparison of the efficiency, side effects and complications of the synthetic dural grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 32(2), 77-82. https://izlik.org/JA23CH53XE
AMA
1.Hamzaoğlu V, Özalp H, Karkucak A, Çokluk C. Comparison of the efficiency, side effects and complications of the synthetic dural grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2015;32(2):77-82. https://izlik.org/JA23CH53XE
Chicago
Hamzaoğlu, Vural, Hakan Özalp, Ahmet Karkucak, and Cengiz Çokluk. 2015. “Comparison of the Efficiency, Side Effects and Complications of the Synthetic Dural Grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 32 (2): 77-82. https://izlik.org/JA23CH53XE.
EndNote
Hamzaoğlu V, Özalp H, Karkucak A, Çokluk C (July 1, 2015) Comparison of the efficiency, side effects and complications of the synthetic dural grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 32 2 77–82.
IEEE
[1]V. Hamzaoğlu, H. Özalp, A. Karkucak, and C. Çokluk, “Comparison of the efficiency, side effects and complications of the synthetic dural grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 77–82, July 2015, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA23CH53XE
ISNAD
Hamzaoğlu, Vural - Özalp, Hakan - Karkucak, Ahmet - Çokluk, Cengiz. “Comparison of the Efficiency, Side Effects and Complications of the Synthetic Dural Grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura”. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 32/2 (July 1, 2015): 77-82. https://izlik.org/JA23CH53XE.
JAMA
1.Hamzaoğlu V, Özalp H, Karkucak A, Çokluk C. Comparison of the efficiency, side effects and complications of the synthetic dural grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2015;32:77–82.
MLA
Hamzaoğlu, Vural, et al. “Comparison of the Efficiency, Side Effects and Complications of the Synthetic Dural Grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 32, no. 2, July 2015, pp. 77-82, https://izlik.org/JA23CH53XE.
Vancouver
1.Vural Hamzaoğlu, Hakan Özalp, Ahmet Karkucak, Cengiz Çokluk. Comparison of the efficiency, side effects and complications of the synthetic dural grafts: Beriplast and Tissudura. J. Exp. Clin. Med. [Internet]. 2015 Jul. 1;32(2):77-82. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA23CH53XE