Research Article

Determinants for poor perinatal outcome in term pregnancies with umbilical cord prolapse

Volume: 39 Number: 1 January 1, 2022
EN

Determinants for poor perinatal outcome in term pregnancies with umbilical cord prolapse

Abstract

Umblical cord prolapse is a very rare condition. It is an obstetric emergency that can have unfavourable consequences for the fetus. We aimed to investigate the determinants for poor perinatal outcome following emergency cesarean delivery performed due to umbilical cord prolapse in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Fifty-three term pregnants and their babies born with cesarean section due to umbilical cord prolapse were included in this retrospective study. Newborns who were taken to neonatal intensive care unit were defined as poor perinatal outcome.Eleven of fifty-three newborns needed intensive care. All of them were discharged without any problem after the treatment. The presence of fetal distress detected before or during the umbilical cord prolapse was found to be the only marker associated with poor perinatal outcome. Abnormalities detected in fetal heart rate monitoring before or during umblical cord prolapse increase poor perinatal outcome in uncomplicated term pregnancies.

Keywords

References

  1. 1. Gabbay-Benziv R, Maman M, Wiznitzer A, Linder N, Yogev Y. Umbilical cord prolapse during delivery - risk factors and pregnancy outcome: a single center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(1):14-17. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.799651
  2. 2. Gibbons C, O'Herlihy C, Murphy JF. Umbilical cord prolapse--changing patterns and improved outcomes: a retrospective cohort study BJOG. 2014;121(13):1705-1708. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12890
  3. 3. Sayed Ahmed WA, Hamdy MA. Optimal management of umbilical cord prolapse. Int J Womens Health. 2018; 10:459-465. Published 2018 Aug 21. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S130879
  4. 4. Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K. Umbilical cord prolapse. A contemporary look. J Reprod Med. 1990;35(7):690-692.
  5. 5. Lin MG. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2006;61(4):269-277. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000208802.20908.c6
  6. 6. Alouini S, Mesnard L, Megier P, Lemaire B, Coly S, Desroches A. Procidence du cordon: prise en charge obstétricale et conséquences néonatales [Management of umbilical cord prolapse and neonatal outcomes]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2010;39(6):471-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.05.013
  7. 7. Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR. Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case-control study among births in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(2):613-618. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70238-1
  8. 8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstetrics and gynecology, 114(1), 192–202. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Health Care Administration

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

January 1, 2022

Submission Date

May 23, 2021

Acceptance Date

July 1, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2022 Volume: 39 Number: 1

APA
Ersak, B., Kokanalı, M. K., Tugrul Ersak, D., Oğuz, Y., & Taşçı, Y. (2022). Determinants for poor perinatal outcome in term pregnancies with umbilical cord prolapse. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, 39(1), 71-74. https://izlik.org/JA36XB44ZS
AMA
1.Ersak B, Kokanalı MK, Tugrul Ersak D, Oğuz Y, Taşçı Y. Determinants for poor perinatal outcome in term pregnancies with umbilical cord prolapse. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2022;39(1):71-74. https://izlik.org/JA36XB44ZS
Chicago
Ersak, Burak, Mahmut Kuntay Kokanalı, Duygu Tugrul Ersak, Yüksel Oğuz, and Yasemin Taşçı. 2022. “Determinants for Poor Perinatal Outcome in Term Pregnancies With Umbilical Cord Prolapse”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 39 (1): 71-74. https://izlik.org/JA36XB44ZS.
EndNote
Ersak B, Kokanalı MK, Tugrul Ersak D, Oğuz Y, Taşçı Y (January 1, 2022) Determinants for poor perinatal outcome in term pregnancies with umbilical cord prolapse. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 39 1 71–74.
IEEE
[1]B. Ersak, M. K. Kokanalı, D. Tugrul Ersak, Y. Oğuz, and Y. Taşçı, “Determinants for poor perinatal outcome in term pregnancies with umbilical cord prolapse”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 71–74, Jan. 2022, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA36XB44ZS
ISNAD
Ersak, Burak - Kokanalı, Mahmut Kuntay - Tugrul Ersak, Duygu - Oğuz, Yüksel - Taşçı, Yasemin. “Determinants for Poor Perinatal Outcome in Term Pregnancies With Umbilical Cord Prolapse”. Deneysel ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi 39/1 (January 1, 2022): 71-74. https://izlik.org/JA36XB44ZS.
JAMA
1.Ersak B, Kokanalı MK, Tugrul Ersak D, Oğuz Y, Taşçı Y. Determinants for poor perinatal outcome in term pregnancies with umbilical cord prolapse. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2022;39:71–74.
MLA
Ersak, Burak, et al. “Determinants for Poor Perinatal Outcome in Term Pregnancies With Umbilical Cord Prolapse”. Deneysel Ve Klinik Tıp Dergisi, vol. 39, no. 1, Jan. 2022, pp. 71-74, https://izlik.org/JA36XB44ZS.
Vancouver
1.Burak Ersak, Mahmut Kuntay Kokanalı, Duygu Tugrul Ersak, Yüksel Oğuz, Yasemin Taşçı. Determinants for poor perinatal outcome in term pregnancies with umbilical cord prolapse. J. Exp. Clin. Med. [Internet]. 2022 Jan. 1;39(1):71-4. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA36XB44ZS