The place of smartphone applications ın emergency medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Medical mobile applications help improve patient care quality, reduce medical errors, and help physicians make faster, evidence-based decisions in patient care, follow-up and rehabilitation. In this study, it was aimed to determine the usage level of smart phone applications among emergency physicians, to investigate the effects of these applications on diagnosis and treatment, to examine their benefits, to determine the expectations regarding these applications, and to raise awareness on ethical issues. Material and Methods: Between 02/25/2018 and 03/25/2018 emergency medicine residents in many provinces of Turkey, emergency medicine specialists, were investigated smartphone app to be used in practice with academics. Results: A statistically significant difference was found between emergency medicine experience and mobile application use (p: 0.020). Most of the physicians surveyed had started using their first mobile apps 4 years ago. It was determined that most of the participants using mobile applications in the medical field were using them as a clinical decision tool. It was observed that those with visual expressions were mostly preferred in the use of mobile applications in the medical field (63.1%). It was determined that 75% of the participants found instant messaging applications useful in the professional field. The biggest problem identified in terms of medical ethics of mobile medical applications; was the thought of a violation of patient privacy. Conclusion: Although technological devices make our lives easier in many ways, examination is of great importance in the patient-physician relationship. Medical mobile applications should be prepared professionally and the content quality should be checked by experts. Due to the nature of current research, it is inevitable that technologies become outdated. There is a need for more comprehensive and up-to-date studies on this subject that appeal to large audiences.

Keywords

• emergency medicine
• mobile phones
• applications

References

1. 1. Jahanshir A, Karimialavijeh E, Sheikh H, Vahedi M, Momeni M. Smartphones and medical applications in the emergency department daily practice. Emergency 2017; 5:1.
2. 2. Önder M, Narin B. Akilli telefonlar ve mobil uygulamalarin (Apps) dermatolojide kullanimi/Smart phones and apps application in dermatology. Turkderm 2013; 47:1.
3. 3. Lindquist A, Johansson P, Petersson G, Saveman B I, Nilsson G. The use of the Personal Digital Assistant (PDA) among personnel and students in health care: a review. Journal of medical Internet research 2008; 10:4, e31.
4. 4. Prgomet M, Georgiou A, Westbrook J I. The impact of mobile handheld technology on hospital physicians' work practices and patient care: a systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 2009; 16(6): 792-801. doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M3215
5. 5. Dala-Ali BM, Lloyd MA, Al-Abed Y. The uses of the iPhone for surgeons. The surgeon 2011; 9(1): 44-48. doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2010.07.014
6. 6. O’Neill S, Brady RRW. Colorectal smartphone apps: opportunities and risks. Colorectal Disease 2012; 14.9: e530-e534. doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1318.2012.03088.x
7. 7. Moskop JC, Sklar DP, Geiderman J M, Schears RM, Bookman K J. Emergency department crowding, part 1—concept, causes, and moral consequences. Annals of emergency medicine 2009; 53(5): 605-611. doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.09.019
8. 8. Ozdalga E, Ozdalga A, Ahuja N. The smartphone in medicine: a review of current and potential use among physicians and students. Journal of medical Internet research 2012; 14(5), e128. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1994.

9. 9. Payne KFB, Wharrad H, Watts K. Smartphone and medical related App use among medical students and junior doctors in the United Kingdom (UK): a regional survey. BMC medical informatics and decision making 2012; 12(1):121. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-121.
10. 10. Schmucker M, Heid J, Haag M. Development of an accommodative smartphone app for medical guidelines in pediatric emergencies. In:Hörbst A, Hayn D, Schreier G, Ammenwerth E (eds.), eHealth 2014-Health Informatics Meets eHealth.1st ed. Netherlands; IOS Press BV; 2014; p. 87-92.
11. 11. Mohan AT, Branford O A. iGuide to plastic surgery: iPhone apps, the plastic surgeon, and the health care environment. Aesthetic surgery journal 2012; 32(5): 653-658. doi.org/10.1177/1090820X12448815
12. 12. Hasselberg M, Wallis L, Blessing P, Laflamme L. A smartphone-based consultation system for acute burns–methodological challenges related to follow-up of the system. Global Health Action 2017;10(sup3):1328168. doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2017.1328168
13. 13. Torous J, Roberts LW. The ethical use of mobile health technology in clinical psychiatry. The Journal of nervous and mental disease 2017;205(1): 4-8. doi:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000596