Determinants for poor perinatal outcome in term pregnancies with umbilical cord prolapse

Year 2022, Volume: 39 Issue: 1, 71 - 74, 01.01.2022

Burak Ersak Mahmut Kuntay Kokanalı Duygu Tugrul Ersak Yüksel Oğuz Yasemin Taşçı

Abstract

Umblical cord prolapse is a very rare condition. It is an obstetric emergency that can have unfavourable consequences for the fetus. We aimed to investigate the determinants for poor perinatal outcome following emergency cesarean delivery performed due to umbilical cord prolapse in uncomplicated term pregnancies. Fifty-three term pregnants and their babies born with cesarean section due to umbilical cord prolapse were included in this retrospective study. Newborns who were taken to neonatal intensive care unit were defined as poor perinatal outcome.Eleven of fifty-three newborns needed intensive care. All of them were discharged without any problem after the treatment. The presence of fetal distress detected before or during the umbilical cord prolapse was found to be the only marker associated with poor perinatal outcome. Abnormalities detected in fetal heart rate monitoring before or during umblical cord prolapse increase poor perinatal outcome in uncomplicated term pregnancies.

Keywords

Cesarean section, perinatal outcome, umblical cord, newborn

References

• 1. Gabbay-Benziv R, Maman M, Wiznitzer A, Linder N, Yogev Y. Umbilical cord prolapse during delivery - risk factors and pregnancy outcome: a single center experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27(1):14-17. doi:10.3109/14767058.2013.799651
• 2. Gibbons C, O'Herlihy C, Murphy JF. Umbilical cord prolapse--changing patterns and improved outcomes: a retrospective cohort study BJOG. 2014;121(13):1705-1708. doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12890
• 3. Sayed Ahmed WA, Hamdy MA. Optimal management of umbilical cord prolapse. Int J Womens Health. 2018; 10:459-465. Published 2018 Aug 21. doi:10.2147/IJWH.S130879
• 4. Koonings PP, Paul RH, Campbell K. Umbilical cord prolapse. A contemporary look. J Reprod Med. 1990;35(7):690-692.
• 5. Lin MG. Umbilical cord prolapse. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2006;61(4):269-277. doi: 10.1097/01.ogx.0000208802.20908.c6
• 6. Alouini S, Mesnard L, Megier P, Lemaire B, Coly S, Desroches A. Procidence du cordon: prise en charge obstétricale et conséquences néonatales [Management of umbilical cord prolapse and neonatal outcomes]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2010;39(6):471-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jgyn.2010.05.013
• 7. Critchlow CW, Leet TL, Benedetti TJ, Daling JR. Risk factors and infant outcomes associated with umbilical cord prolapse: a population-based case-control study among births in Washington State. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;170(2):613-618. doi:10.1016/s0002-9378(94)70238-1
• 8. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles. Obstetrics and gynecology, 114(1), 192–202. doi:10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181aef106
• 9. Hehir MP et al Perinatal death associated with umbilical cord prolapse. Journal of perinatal medicine, 45(5), 565–570. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2016-0223
• 10. Huang JP, Chen CP, Chen CP, Wang KG, Wang KL. Term pregnancy with umbilical cord prolapse. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;51(3):375-380. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.07.010
• 11. Obeidat N, Zayed F, Alchalabi H, Obeidat B, El-Jallad MF, Obeidat M. Umbilical cord prolapse: a 10-year retrospective study in two civil hospitals, North Jordan. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;30(3):257-260. doi:10.3109/01443610903474330
• 12. Nizard J. Neonatal Outcome Following Prolonged Umbilical Cord Prolapse in Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes. BJOG; an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 112(6), 833–836. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00603.x
• 13. Roemer VM, Heger-Römermann G. Clinic structure and timely management of emergency cesarean section--reference values and recommendations. Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol. 1993;197(4):153-161.
• 14. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Umbilical Cord Prolapse: Green-top Guideline No. 50. London, UK: RCOG, 2014.
• 15. Guidelines for Perinatal Care. 5th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL, Washington, DC: AAP, ACOG; 2002. American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists; p. 147.
• 16. Bloom SL, Leveno KJ, Spong CY, et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2006;108(1):6-11. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000224693.07785.14
• 17. Thomas J, Paranjothy S, James D. National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section. BMJ. 2004;328(7441):665. doi:10.1136/bmj.38031.775845.7C