Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Reconstructive options and analysis in breast reconstruction : Our clinical experience

Year 2024, Volume: 41 Issue: 3, 600 - 605, 30.09.2024

Abstract

Breast cancer ranks first worldwide in cancer-related deaths in women. The percentage of breast cancer in Turkey has almost doubled in the last decade. Breast cancer treatment encompasses a broad spectrum of oncological treatments, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy and oncoplastic surgical treatments. Oncoplastic reconstruction is an integral part of breast cancer treatment, providing favorable aesthetic and psychological outcomes. In our study, the breast reconstructions of 166 patients who underwent mastectomy due to tumoral pathologies, performed by our institute between 2005 and 2023, were analyzed from various aspects. Based on our 19 years of experience, the number of breast reconstruction surgeries has increased dramatically in the last ten years; however, the repair trend has shifted to immediate and also implant-based reconstruction procedures.

References

  • Schmauss D, Machens HG, Harder Y. Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy. Vol. 2, Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2016.
  • Ozmen V. Breast Cancer in Turkey: Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics (Analysis of 13.240 Patients). J Breast Health. 2014 May 3;10(2):98–105.
  • Ozmen V, Boylu S, Ok E, Canturk NZ, Celik V, Kapkac M, et al. Factors affecting breast cancer treatment delay in Turkey: a study from Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies. Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb 1;25(1):9–14.
  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394–424.
  • Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941–53.
  • Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast. 2017 Apr 1;32:7–12.
  • Çakmak GK, Emiroğlu S, Sezer A, Canturk NZ, Yeniay L, Kuru B, et al. Surgical Trends in Breast Cancer in Turkey: An Increase in Breast-Conserving Surgery. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Feb 28(6):285-292. doi:10.1200/JGO.19.00275.
  • Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials. The Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1707–16.
  • Seidel W, Bins-Ely J, Ongaratto Barazzetti D, Della Giustina R, Walter GP, Ferri TA, et al. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: Comparative analysis of early and delayed reconstruction. Minerva Chir. 2017 Jun 1;72(3):188–99.
  • Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi P, Raposio E. One-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Concise Review. Vol. 2017, BioMed Research International. Hindawi Limited; 2017.
  • Özmen V, Özmen T, Doğru V. Breast Cancer in Turkey; An Analysis of 20.000 Patients with Breast Cancer. Eur J Breast Health. 2019 Jul 1;15(3):141–6.
  • Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, et al. A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Part 2. The Influence of Changing Mastectomy Patterns on Reconstructive Rate and Method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3).
  • Gardani M, Bertozzi N, Grieco MP, Pesce M, Simonacci F, Santi P, et al. Breast reconstruction with anatomical implants: A review of indications and techniques based on current literature. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2017;21:96–104.
  • Veronesi U, Stafyla V, Petit JY, Veronesi P. Conservative mastectomy: Extending the idea of breast conservation. Vol. 13, The Lancet Oncology. 2012.
  • Butler PD, Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Wink JD, Chang B, Fosnot J, et al. Racial and age disparities persist in immediate breast reconstruction: an updated analysis of 48,564 patients from the 2005 to 2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program data sets. The American Journal of Surgery. 2016;212(1):96–101.
  • Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM, et al. A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1).
  • Yoon AP, Qi J, Brown DL, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Erdmann-Sager J, et al. Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Results of a multicenter prospective study. The Breast. 2018;37:72–9.
  • Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Two-Year Results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7).
  • Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A Single Surgeon’s 12-Year Experience with Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: Part I. A Prospective Analysis of Early Complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(4).
  • Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: Experience with 1195 Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(5).
  • Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A Single Surgeon’s 12-Year Experience with Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: Part II. An Analysis of Long-Term Complications, Aesthetic Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(4).
  • Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh AO, Alderman A, Giordano SH, Buchholz TA, et al. Complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer a claims-bas ed analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(2):219–27.
  • Basta MN, Gerety PA, Serletti JM, Kovach SJ, Fischer JP. A Systematic Review and Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis of Outcomes following Direct-to-Implant versus Conventional Two-Stage Implant Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(6)..
Year 2024, Volume: 41 Issue: 3, 600 - 605, 30.09.2024

Abstract

References

  • Schmauss D, Machens HG, Harder Y. Breast Reconstruction after Mastectomy. Vol. 2, Frontiers in Surgery. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2016.
  • Ozmen V. Breast Cancer in Turkey: Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics (Analysis of 13.240 Patients). J Breast Health. 2014 May 3;10(2):98–105.
  • Ozmen V, Boylu S, Ok E, Canturk NZ, Celik V, Kapkac M, et al. Factors affecting breast cancer treatment delay in Turkey: a study from Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies. Eur J Public Health. 2015 Feb 1;25(1):9–14.
  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394–424.
  • Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer. 2019 Apr 15;144(8):1941–53.
  • Ilonzo N, Tsang A, Tsantes S, Estabrook A, Thu Ma AM. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A ten-year analysis of trends and immediate postoperative outcomes. Breast. 2017 Apr 1;32:7–12.
  • Çakmak GK, Emiroğlu S, Sezer A, Canturk NZ, Yeniay L, Kuru B, et al. Surgical Trends in Breast Cancer in Turkey: An Increase in Breast-Conserving Surgery. JCO Glob Oncol. 2020 Feb 28(6):285-292. doi:10.1200/JGO.19.00275.
  • Effect of radiotherapy after breast-conserving surgery on 10-year recurrence and 15-year breast cancer death: meta-analysis of individual patient data for 10 801 women in 17 randomised trials. The Lancet. 2011;378(9804):1707–16.
  • Seidel W, Bins-Ely J, Ongaratto Barazzetti D, Della Giustina R, Walter GP, Ferri TA, et al. Breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: Comparative analysis of early and delayed reconstruction. Minerva Chir. 2017 Jun 1;72(3):188–99.
  • Bertozzi N, Pesce M, Santi P, Raposio E. One-Stage Immediate Breast Reconstruction: A Concise Review. Vol. 2017, BioMed Research International. Hindawi Limited; 2017.
  • Özmen V, Özmen T, Doğru V. Breast Cancer in Turkey; An Analysis of 20.000 Patients with Breast Cancer. Eur J Breast Health. 2019 Jul 1;15(3):141–6.
  • Cemal Y, Albornoz CR, Disa JJ, McCarthy CM, Mehrara BJ, Pusic AL, et al. A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Part 2. The Influence of Changing Mastectomy Patterns on Reconstructive Rate and Method. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(3).
  • Gardani M, Bertozzi N, Grieco MP, Pesce M, Simonacci F, Santi P, et al. Breast reconstruction with anatomical implants: A review of indications and techniques based on current literature. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2017;21:96–104.
  • Veronesi U, Stafyla V, Petit JY, Veronesi P. Conservative mastectomy: Extending the idea of breast conservation. Vol. 13, The Lancet Oncology. 2012.
  • Butler PD, Nelson JA, Fischer JP, Wink JD, Chang B, Fosnot J, et al. Racial and age disparities persist in immediate breast reconstruction: an updated analysis of 48,564 patients from the 2005 to 2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program data sets. The American Journal of Surgery. 2016;212(1):96–101.
  • Albornoz CR, Bach PB, Mehrara BJ, Disa JJ, Pusic AL, McCarthy CM, et al. A Paradigm Shift in U.S. Breast Reconstruction: Increasing Implant Rates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(1).
  • Yoon AP, Qi J, Brown DL, Kim HM, Hamill JB, Erdmann-Sager J, et al. Outcomes of immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction: Results of a multicenter prospective study. The Breast. 2018;37:72–9.
  • Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Kim HM, Lowery JC. Complications in Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction: Two-Year Results of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(7).
  • Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A Single Surgeon’s 12-Year Experience with Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: Part I. A Prospective Analysis of Early Complications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(4).
  • Mehrara BJ, Santoro TD, Arcilla E, Watson JP, Shaw WW, Da Lio AL. Complications after Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: Experience with 1195 Flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(5).
  • Cordeiro PG, McCarthy CM. A Single Surgeon’s 12-Year Experience with Tissue Expander/Implant Breast Reconstruction: Part II. An Analysis of Long-Term Complications, Aesthetic Outcomes, and Patient Satisfaction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118(4).
  • Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh AO, Alderman A, Giordano SH, Buchholz TA, et al. Complications after mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction for breast cancer a claims-bas ed analysis. Ann Surg. 2016;263(2):219–27.
  • Basta MN, Gerety PA, Serletti JM, Kovach SJ, Fischer JP. A Systematic Review and Head-to-Head Meta-Analysis of Outcomes following Direct-to-Implant versus Conventional Two-Stage Implant Reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(6)..
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Ahmet Demir 0000-0002-8820-3122

İlker Altundağ 0000-0002-5827-3840

Engin Selamioğlu 0000-0002-3744-9325

Mustafa Sertaç Ocak 0000-0002-5349-9904

Mehmet Berke Göztepe 0000-0002-1193-3696

Cihan Gençtürk 0000-0003-0456-1887

Publication Date September 30, 2024
Submission Date May 29, 2024
Acceptance Date July 8, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024 Volume: 41 Issue: 3

Cite

APA Demir, A., Altundağ, İ., Selamioğlu, E., Ocak, M. S., et al. (2024). Reconstructive options and analysis in breast reconstruction : Our clinical experience. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 41(3), 600-605.
AMA Demir A, Altundağ İ, Selamioğlu E, Ocak MS, Göztepe MB, Gençtürk C. Reconstructive options and analysis in breast reconstruction : Our clinical experience. J. Exp. Clin. Med. September 2024;41(3):600-605.
Chicago Demir, Ahmet, İlker Altundağ, Engin Selamioğlu, Mustafa Sertaç Ocak, Mehmet Berke Göztepe, and Cihan Gençtürk. “Reconstructive Options and Analysis in Breast Reconstruction : Our Clinical Experience”. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 41, no. 3 (September 2024): 600-605.
EndNote Demir A, Altundağ İ, Selamioğlu E, Ocak MS, Göztepe MB, Gençtürk C (September 1, 2024) Reconstructive options and analysis in breast reconstruction : Our clinical experience. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 41 3 600–605.
IEEE A. Demir, İ. Altundağ, E. Selamioğlu, M. S. Ocak, M. B. Göztepe, and C. Gençtürk, “Reconstructive options and analysis in breast reconstruction : Our clinical experience”, J. Exp. Clin. Med., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 600–605, 2024.
ISNAD Demir, Ahmet et al. “Reconstructive Options and Analysis in Breast Reconstruction : Our Clinical Experience”. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine 41/3 (September 2024), 600-605.
JAMA Demir A, Altundağ İ, Selamioğlu E, Ocak MS, Göztepe MB, Gençtürk C. Reconstructive options and analysis in breast reconstruction : Our clinical experience. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2024;41:600–605.
MLA Demir, Ahmet et al. “Reconstructive Options and Analysis in Breast Reconstruction : Our Clinical Experience”. Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, vol. 41, no. 3, 2024, pp. 600-5.
Vancouver Demir A, Altundağ İ, Selamioğlu E, Ocak MS, Göztepe MB, Gençtürk C. Reconstructive options and analysis in breast reconstruction : Our clinical experience. J. Exp. Clin. Med. 2024;41(3):600-5.