Performance Based Budgeting in the Dutch Justice System

Year 2019, , 185 - 208, 10.07.2019

Fatih Deyneli

https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.479730

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Today, most OECD countries use
Performance Budgeting system. Providing effective, economic and efficient use
of public resources are the most important advantages of the Performance
Budgeting system. However, especially in some public services, there are practical
difficulties. One of the services which this problem occurs is the justice
service. In this study, the justice budget will be examined in the Dutch case.
The data used in the Netherlands are obtained from relevant laws, budget laws,
reports of authorities, web pages of authorities, annual reports and strategic
plans. The Council of the Judiciary, which is settled between the Ministry of
Justice and the courts, has a regulatory and supervisory role in the budget
process.

Keywords

Justice Budget, Council of the Judiciary, The Netherlands Judicial System

Hollanda Adalet Sisteminde Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme Uygulaması

Abstract

Günümüzde birçok OECD ülkesi Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme
sistemini uygulamaktadır. Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme sistemi ile kamu
kaynaklarının etkin, ekonomik ve verimli kullanılmasının sağlanabileceği konusu
bu sistemin en önemli avantajları arasında yer almaktadır. Ancak, özellikle
bazı kamu hizmetlerinde ortaya çıkan uygulama zorlukları da bulunmaktadır. Bu
zorlukların ortaya çıktığı hizmetlerden biri de adalet hizmetleridir. Bu
çalışmada, adalet hizmetlerinin bütçesi Hollanda örneğinde incelenecektir.
Çalışmada Hollanda ile ilgili kullanılan veriler; Adalet Bakanlığı bütçe
kanunlarından, ilgili diğer kanunlardan, ilgili makamların web sayfalarından,
Yargı Konseyinin stratejik planlarından ve yıllık raporlarından elde
edilmiştir. Adalet Bakanlığı ile mahkemeler arasında yer alan Yargı Konseyinin
bütçe sürecinde düzenleyici ve denetleyici bir rolü vardır.

Keywords

Adalet bütçesi, Yargı Konseyi, Hollanda Adalet Sistemi

References

• Beers, D. J. (2012). Judicial Self-Governance and the Rule of Law. Problems of Post-Communism, 59(5), 50–67. http://doi.org/10.2753/PPC1075-8216590504
• Blöndal, J. R., & Kristensen, J. K. (2002). Budgeting in the Netherlands. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1(3), 43–80.
• Buscaglia, E., & Ulen, T. (1997). A quantitative assessment of the efficiency of the judicial sector in Latin America. International Review of Law and Economics, 17(2), 275–291. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(97)00007-0
• CEPEJ. (2016). European judicial systems: Efficiency and quality of justice.
• Debets, R. (2007). Performance Budgeting in the Netherlands. OECD Journal on Budgeting , 7(4).
• Deyneli, F. (2010). Türkiye’de Adalet Ekonomisinin Karşılaştırmalı Analizi (Yayın No:). Ankara: T.C. MALİYE BAKANLIĞI Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı.
• Dijk, F. Van. (2014). Improved Performance Of The Netherlands Judiciary : Assessment Of The Gains For Society International Journal For Court Administration | June 2014, 6(1), 1–17.
• Dijk, F. Van, & Kouwenhoven, R. (2014). Judicial Reform in the Netherlands Change in broad outline. In Suzan Verberk (Ed.), . Hague.
• Erüz Ertan. (2005). 20. Türkiye Maliye Sempozyumu. In Yeni Mali Yönetim Yapısında Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme. Karahayıt/Pamukkale: T. C. Pamukkale Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Maliye Bölümü.
• Garoupa, N., & Ginsburg, T. (2009). Guarding the Guardians: Judicial Councils and Judicial Independence. American Journal of Comparative Law, 57(1), 103–134. http://doi.org/10.5131/ajcl.2008.0004
• Groszyk, W., Kromann Kristensen, J., & Bühler, B. (2002). Outcome-focused Management and Budgeting. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 1(4), 7–34. http://doi.org/10.1787/budget-v1-art20-en
• Holvast, N. (2017). In the shadow of the judge : the involvement of judicial assistants in dutch district courts. Eleven International Publishing.
• Kirat, T. (2010). Performance-Based Budgeting and Management of Judicial Courts in France: an Assessment. International Journal For Court Administration, 2(2), 12–20.
• Köhling, W. K. C. (2000). The Economic Consequences of a Weak Judiciary: Insights From India. BONN.
• Langbroek, P. M. (2010). Organization Development of the Dutch Judiciary, between Accountability and Judicial Independence. International Journal for Court Administration, 2(2).
• Langbroek, P. M. (2017, January 9). Organization Development of the Dutch Judiciary, between Accountability and Judicial Independence.
• Langbroek, P. M., Dijkstra, R. I., Bozorg Zadeh, K., & Türk, Z. (2017). Performance management of courts and judges: organizational and professional learning versus political accountabilities, 297–325.
• Musgrave, R. A. (1989). Public Finance in Theory and Practice (Fifth Edit). McGraw-Hill.
• Ng Yein, G. (2007). Quality of Judiciary Organization Checks and Balances. Utrecht: Intersentia.
• OECD. (2016). Performance budgeting.
• Oral, E. (2005). Bazı OECD Ülkelerinde Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme Uygulamaları, Gelişimi Ve Türk Mali Sistemi Açısından Bir Değerlendirme. Ankara.
• Özen, A. (2008). Performans Esaslı Bütçeleme Sistemi ve Türkiye’de Uygulanabilirliği (Yayın No:2). Ankara: T.C. MALİYE BAKANLIĞI Strateji Geliştirme Başkanlığı.
• Posseth, J., & van Nispen, F. K. M. (2006). 2nd Transatlantic Dialogue, A Performing Budgeting Sector. In Performance Budgeting in The Netherlands: From Policy Budget to Accounting for Policy. Leuven.
• Puts, J. (2017). Funding of the Dutch Judiciary Performance based budgeting. Riga.
• Raad voor de rechtspraak. (2014). Visie op de Rechtspraak 2020. Den Haag.
• Raad voor de Rechtspraak. (2008). Quality of the judicial system in the Netherlands. The Hauge.
• Raad voor de Rechtspraak. (2013). The Financing System of the Netherlands Judiciary. The Hauge.
• Raad voor de Rechtspraak. (2018). Jaarrplan 2018 Rechtspraak maakt samen leven mogelijk.
• Sorber, B. (1993). Performance Measurement in the Central Government Departments of the Netherlands. Public Productivity & Management Review, 17(1), 59. http://doi.org/10.2307/3381049
• Sterck, M., & Scheers, B. (2006). Trends in Performance Budgeting in Seven OECD countries. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(1), 47–72. http://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300103
• Tüğen, K. (2018). Devlet Bütçesi. İzmir.
• van de Rechtspraak. (2018). Jaarplan 2018.
• van Nispen, F. K. M., & Posseth, J. (2006). Performance Budgeting in the Netherlands: Beyond Arithmetic. O E C D Journal on Budgeting, 6(4), 1–27.
• Voigt, S. (2016). Determinants of judicial efficiency: a survey. European Journal of Law and Economics, 42(2), 183–208. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-016-9531-6
• Yavuz, H. A. (2016). Hollanda Adalet Sistemi Üzerine Notlar. Adalet Dergisi, 56, 23–54.