Understanding Open Innovation in Terms of Interorganizational Relationships: A Conceptual Review

Year 2019, , 209 - 226, 10.07.2019

Ayşegül Özbebek Tunç , Oya Zincir

https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.482902

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Open innovation assumes that the boundaries of
organizations are more permeable and open, provides a flow of information which
is based on innovation activities between the organization and its environment
and focuses on the direction, nature and conditions of the flow of information.
It requires interorganizational relationships and it is realized through making
innovation activities with other organizations by joining some innovation
networks. The paper aims to discuss open innovation by assumptions and concepts
of some organizational theories. For this purpose, approaches of open system,
population ecology and social network are addressed as the framework to comment
on the mindset of open innovation in terms of interorganizational
relationships. In addition to this, the new competition and strategy approaches
and roles of managers as decision makers while deciding open innovation are
explained in terms of open innovation.

Keywords

Open Innovation, Population Ecology, Open System, Social Network, Interorganizational Relationship

Örgütler Arası İlişki Bağlamında Açık İnovasyonu Anlamak: Kavramsal Bir Değerlendirme

Abstract

Açık inovasyon
örgüt sınırlarının daha geçirgen ve açık olduğunu varsayar, örgüt ile çevresi
arasında inovasyona yönelik bir bilgi akışı öngörür ve bu bilgi akışının
yönüne, doğasına ve içinde bulunduğu koşullara odaklanır; bu da birtakım
örgütler arası ilişkiler gerektirir. Açık inovasyon, çoğunlukla örgütlerin
inovasyon ağlarına katılarak diğer örgütlerle iş birliği içerisinde çeşitli
inovasyon faaliyetleri ile gerçekleşir. Bu makalenin amacı açık inovasyonu bazı
örgüt kuramları ve ilişkili kavramlarla ele almaktır. Bu amaçla, örgütü diğer
örgütler ile birlikte değerlendiren örgütler arası ilişki bağlamında açık
inovasyon mantığını değerlendirmede bir çerçeve olarak başta açık sistem olmak
üzere popülasyon ekolojisi ve sosyal ağ kuramının varsayımları ele alınmakta ve
dahası yeni rekabet ve strateji anlayışına ve örgütler için karar alıcıların
açık inovasyon sürecindeki rollerine değinilmektedir.  

Keywords

Açık İnovasyon, Popülasyon Ekolojisi, Açık Sistem, Sosyal Ağ, Örgütler Arası İlişki

References

• Anderson, C. (2014). Geleceği üretenler. Çev.: Levent Göktem. İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları. Bahemia, H., & Squire, B. (2010). A contingent perspective of open innovation in new product development projects. International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 603-627.Bessant, J., & Tidd, J. (2018). İnovasyon ve girişimcilik. Çev. Ed.: A. Esra Aslan. İstanbul: Nobel Basım Yayıncılık.Bogers, M., Zobel, A. K., Afuah, A. Almirall, E., Brunswicker, S., Dahlander, L., et al. (2016). The open innovation research landscape: established perspectives and emerging themes across different levels of analysis. Industry and Innovation, 24(1), 8-40.Bogers, M. (2014). A beginners guide to open innovation. Global Innovation Magazine, 2, 4-8.Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). New York: Greenwood Publishing.Chesbrough, H. (2003). The era of open innovation. Sloan Management Review, 44(3), 35-41.Chesbrough, H. (2004). Managing open innovation. Research Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26.Chesbrough, H. & Appleyard, M. M. (2007). Open innovation and strategy. California Management Review, 50(1), 57-76.Chesbrough, H. (2011). Everything You Need to Know About Open Innovation. [Çevrimiçi: https://www.forbes.com/sites/henrychesbrough/2011/03/21/everything-you-need-to-know-about-open-innovation/#735c1a9b75f4], Erişim Tarihi: 21.04.2018.Chesbrough, H., & Bogers, M. (2014). Explicating open innovation: clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation. In Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W. & West, J. (Eds.), New frontiers in open innovation (pp. 3-28). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Chesbrough, H. (2017). The future of open innovation. Research and Technology Management, 60(1), 35-38. Chiaroni, D., Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2011). The open innovation journey: how firms dynamically implement the emerging innovation management paradigm. Technovation, 31(1), 34-43.Coghlan, D., & Brannick, T. (2003). Kurt Lewin: the practical theorist for the 21st century. Irish Journal of Management, 24(2), 31.Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.Colvin, G. (2016). Humans are underrated: What high achievers know that brilliant machines never will. New York: Penguin Publishing.Çulpan, R. (2014). Open innovation business models and the role of interfirm partnerships. In R. Çulpan (Ed.), Open innovation through strategic alliances: approaches for product, technology and business model creation (pp. 17-39). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Dahlander, L., & Gann, D. M. (2010). How open is innovation?. Research Policy, 39(6), 699-709.Dittrich, K., & Duysters, G. (2007). Networking as a means to strategy change: the case of open innovation in mobile telephony. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 510-521.Enkel, E., Gassmann, O., & Chesbrough, H. (2009). Open R&D and open innovation: exploring the phenomenon. R&D Management, 39(4), 311-316.Felin, T., Lakhani, K. R., & Tushman, M. L. (2017). Firms, crowds, and innovation. Strategic Organization, 15(2), 119-140.Fleming, L., & Waguespack, D. M. (2007). Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organization Science, 18(2), 165-180.Gassmann, O. & Enkel, E. (2004). Towards a theory of open innovation: three core process archetypes. R&D Management Conference (RADMA), Lisbon, Portugal, July 6, pp.1-18.Gemünden, H. G., Salomo, S. & Hölzle, K. (2007). Role models for radical innovations in times of open innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(4), 408-421.Griffin, A., Noble, C. H., & Durmusoglu, S. S. (2014). Open innovation: new product development essentials from the PDMA. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons.Hodgkinson, C. (2008). Yönetim felsefesi: örgütsel yaşamda değerler ve motivasyon (1.Baskı), Çev. Ed.: İbrahim Anıl ve Binali Doğan, İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.Huizingh, E.K.R.E. (2011). Open innovation: state of the art and future perspectives. Technovation, 31, 2–9.Ili, S., Albers, A., & Miller, S. (2010). Open innovation in the automotive industry. R&D Management, 40(3), 246-255.Inauen, M., & Schenker-Wicki, A. (2011). The impact of outside-in open innovation on innovation performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 496-520.Keskin, H, Akgün, A. E. ve Koçoğlu, İ. (2016). Örgüt teorisi. Ankara: Nobel Basım Yayıncılık.Kutvonen, A. (2011). Strategic application of outbound open innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 460-474.Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006), Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131-150.Lewin, K. (1948). Group decision and social change. In E. Maccoby, E. Newcomb & E Hartley (Eds.). Readings in social psychology (pp. 197-211). New York: Holt Publishing. Lichtenthaler, U. (2005). External commercialization of knowledge: Review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(4), 231-255.Lichtenthaler, U. (2011). Open innovation: past research, current debates and future directions, Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(1), 75-93.McGrath, R. G. (2013). Rekabet avantajının sonu: stratejinin işinizin hızına yetişmesi nasıl sağlanır?. Çev.: İlker Gülfidan, İstanbul: Optimist Yayıncılık.Miles, J. A., (2016). Yönetim ve organizasyon kuramları. Çev. Ed.: Mustafa Polat ve Korhan Arun. Ankara: Nobel Basım Yayıncılık.Morgan, G. (1998). Yönetim ve örgüt teorilerinde metafor, Çev.: Gündüz Bulut, İstanbul: Mess Yayınları.Natalicchio, A., Ardito, L., Savino, T., & Albino, V. (2017). Managing knowledge assets for open innovation: a systematic literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1362-1383.Önder, Ç., & Üsdiken, B. (2010), Örgütsel ekoloji: örgüt toplulukları ve çevresel ayıklama, İçinde Selami Sargut ve Şükrü Özen (Ed.), Örgüt kuramları (ss. 133-192). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33-60.Sargut, A.S. ve Özen, Ş. (2010). İçinde Selami Sargut ve Şükrü Özen (Ed.), Örgüt kuramları (ss. 11-34). Ankara: İmge Kitabevi.Satell, G. (2017). İnovasyonu haritalamak: dijital çağda özgün inovasyon stratejileri, Çev. Taner Gezer, İstanbul: Optimist Yayınları.Schroll, A., & Mild, A. (2011). Open innovation modes and the role of internal R&D: An empirical study on open innovation adoption in Europe. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(4), 475-495.Sözen, C. H. ve Gürbüz, S. (2012). Örgütsel ağlar. İçinde H. Cenk Sözen, H. Nejat Basım, (Ed.), Örgüt kuramları (ss. 301-326). İstanbul: Beta Yayıncılık.Verdin, P., & Tackx, K. (2015). Are you creating or capturing value? a dynamic framework for sustainable strategy. M-RCBG Associate Working Papers, No: 26, [Çevrimiçi: https://www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/centers/mrcbg/files/Verdin_final.pdf], Erişim tarihi: 14.04.2018.West, J., & Bogers, M. (2014). Leveraging external sources of innovation: a review of research on open innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(4), 814-831.