Theoretical Assessment of Competitive State Model on Fiscal Policy

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 259 - 270, 10.07.2019

Mustafa Alpin Gülşen , Ali Gökhan Gölçek

https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.512336

Abstract

Globalization has caused changes in the social and economic structure.
These changes not only affected households and firms, but also the public
sector and its fiscal policies. This effect led to the transformation of the
public sector into a competitive structure, just as it was in the private
sector. From this point of view, the public sector is trying to increase the
power of global markets with its competitive fiscal policies. In the study, the
mentioned fiscal policies are considered within the framework of competitive
state theory and are evaluated within the scope of fiscal policies for fiscal
competition, internal devaluation, fiscal devaluation and innovation.

Keywords

Competitive State, Fiscal Policies, Devaluation, Innovation

Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi

Abstract

Küreselleşme bir bütün olarak
sosyal ve iktisadi yapıda değişliklere neden olmuştur. Bu değişiklikler sadece
hane halkı ve firmaları değil, aynı zamanda kamu kesimini ve onun maliye
politikalarını da etkilemiştir.  Bu etki,
tıpkı özel kesimdeki rekabet anlayışında olduğu gibi kamu kesiminin de
rekabetçi bir yapıya dönüşmesine yol açmıştır. 
Bu açıdan kamu kesimi, rekabetçi maliye politikalarıyla küresel
piyasalardaki gücünü artırmaya çalışmaktadır. Çalışmada söz konusu maliye
politikaları rekabetçi devlet kuramı çerçevesinde ele alınmakta ve mali
rekabet, içsel devalüasyon, mali devalüasyon ile inovasyona yönelik maliye
politikaları kapsamında değerlendirilmektedir.

Keywords

Rekabetçi Devlet, Maliye Politikaları, İnovasyon

References

• KAYNAKÇA
• Aghion, P. ve Peter H. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
• Armingeon, K., & Baccaro, L. (2012). Political economy of the sovereign debt crisis: The limits of internal devaluation. Industrial Law Journal, 41(3), 254-275.
• Besson (2007.) TVA sociale, Secrétariat d’État chargé de la Prospective et de l’Évaluation des Politiques Publiques.
• Bucovetsky, S. (1991). Asymmetric tax competition. Journal of urban economics, 30(2), 167-181.
• Caprioli, F., Romanelli, M., & Tommasino, P. (2017). Discretionary fiscal policy in the Euro area: past, present, future (No. 398). Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
• Cemy, P. G., & Evans, M. (2000). New Labour, globalization, and the competition state. Center for European Studies Working Paper Series, 70.
• Cerny, P. G. (1996). Globalization and other stories: The search for a new paradigm for international relations. International Journal, 51(4), 617-637.
• Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. Verso Books.
• De Grauwe, P. (2012). In Search of Symmetry in the Eurozone (No. 6901). Centre for European Policy Studies.
• Doyle, C., & Van Wijnbergen, S. (1994). Taxation of foreign multinationals: A sequential bargaining approach to tax holidays. International Tax and Public Finance, 1(3), 211-225.EC (European Commission) (2015a). Supply and Demand Side Innovation Policies: Annexes of First Policy Brief, Publications Office of The European Union.
• EC (European Commission) (2015b). Supply and Demand Side Innovation Policies: Annexes of Full Policy, Publications Office of The European Union.
• Edler J. & Georghiou L. (2007). Public Procurement and İnnovation—Resurrecting the Demand Side. Research Policy 36, 949–963.