Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Theoretical Assessment of Competitive State Model on Fiscal Policy

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 259 - 270, 10.07.2019
https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.512336

Abstract

Globalization has caused changes in the social and economic structure.
These changes not only affected households and firms, but also the public
sector and its fiscal policies. This effect led to the transformation of the
public sector into a competitive structure, just as it was in the private
sector. From this point of view, the public sector is trying to increase the
power of global markets with its competitive fiscal policies. In the study, the
mentioned fiscal policies are considered within the framework of competitive
state theory and are evaluated within the scope of fiscal policies for fiscal
competition, internal devaluation, fiscal devaluation and innovation.

References

  • KAYNAKÇA
  • Aghion, P. ve Peter H. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • Armingeon, K., & Baccaro, L. (2012). Political economy of the sovereign debt crisis: The limits of internal devaluation. Industrial Law Journal, 41(3), 254-275.
  • Besson (2007.) TVA sociale, Secrétariat d’État chargé de la Prospective et de l’Évaluation des Politiques Publiques.
  • Bucovetsky, S. (1991). Asymmetric tax competition. Journal of urban economics, 30(2), 167-181.
  • Caprioli, F., Romanelli, M., & Tommasino, P. (2017). Discretionary fiscal policy in the Euro area: past, present, future (No. 398). Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Cemy, P. G., & Evans, M. (2000). New Labour, globalization, and the competition state. Center for European Studies Working Paper Series, 70.
  • Cerny, P. G. (1996). Globalization and other stories: The search for a new paradigm for international relations. International Journal, 51(4), 617-637.
  • Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. Verso Books.
  • De Grauwe, P. (2012). In Search of Symmetry in the Eurozone (No. 6901). Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Doyle, C., & Van Wijnbergen, S. (1994). Taxation of foreign multinationals: A sequential bargaining approach to tax holidays. International Tax and Public Finance, 1(3), 211-225.EC (European Commission) (2015a). Supply and Demand Side Innovation Policies: Annexes of First Policy Brief, Publications Office of The European Union.
  • EC (European Commission) (2015b). Supply and Demand Side Innovation Policies: Annexes of Full Policy, Publications Office of The European Union.
  • Edler J. & Georghiou L. (2007). Public Procurement and İnnovation—Resurrecting the Demand Side. Research Policy 36, 949–963.

Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi

Year 2019, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 259 - 270, 10.07.2019
https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.512336

Abstract

Küreselleşme bir bütün olarak
sosyal ve iktisadi yapıda değişliklere neden olmuştur. Bu değişiklikler sadece
hane halkı ve firmaları değil, aynı zamanda kamu kesimini ve onun maliye
politikalarını da etkilemiştir.  Bu etki,
tıpkı özel kesimdeki rekabet anlayışında olduğu gibi kamu kesiminin de
rekabetçi bir yapıya dönüşmesine yol açmıştır. 
Bu açıdan kamu kesimi, rekabetçi maliye politikalarıyla küresel
piyasalardaki gücünü artırmaya çalışmaktadır. Çalışmada söz konusu maliye
politikaları rekabetçi devlet kuramı çerçevesinde ele alınmakta ve mali
rekabet, içsel devalüasyon, mali devalüasyon ile inovasyona yönelik maliye
politikaları kapsamında değerlendirilmektedir.

References

  • KAYNAKÇA
  • Aghion, P. ve Peter H. (1998). Endogenous Growth Theory. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
  • Armingeon, K., & Baccaro, L. (2012). Political economy of the sovereign debt crisis: The limits of internal devaluation. Industrial Law Journal, 41(3), 254-275.
  • Besson (2007.) TVA sociale, Secrétariat d’État chargé de la Prospective et de l’Évaluation des Politiques Publiques.
  • Bucovetsky, S. (1991). Asymmetric tax competition. Journal of urban economics, 30(2), 167-181.
  • Caprioli, F., Romanelli, M., & Tommasino, P. (2017). Discretionary fiscal policy in the Euro area: past, present, future (No. 398). Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
  • Cemy, P. G., & Evans, M. (2000). New Labour, globalization, and the competition state. Center for European Studies Working Paper Series, 70.
  • Cerny, P. G. (1996). Globalization and other stories: The search for a new paradigm for international relations. International Journal, 51(4), 617-637.
  • Dardot, P., & Laval, C. (2014). The new way of the world: On neoliberal society. Verso Books.
  • De Grauwe, P. (2012). In Search of Symmetry in the Eurozone (No. 6901). Centre for European Policy Studies.
  • Doyle, C., & Van Wijnbergen, S. (1994). Taxation of foreign multinationals: A sequential bargaining approach to tax holidays. International Tax and Public Finance, 1(3), 211-225.EC (European Commission) (2015a). Supply and Demand Side Innovation Policies: Annexes of First Policy Brief, Publications Office of The European Union.
  • EC (European Commission) (2015b). Supply and Demand Side Innovation Policies: Annexes of Full Policy, Publications Office of The European Union.
  • Edler J. & Georghiou L. (2007). Public Procurement and İnnovation—Resurrecting the Demand Side. Research Policy 36, 949–963.
There are 13 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Economics
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Mustafa Alpin Gülşen 0000-0002-2860-4469

Ali Gökhan Gölçek 0000-0002-7948-7688

Publication Date July 10, 2019
Submission Date January 13, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Gülşen, M. A., & Gölçek, A. G. (2019). Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(2), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.512336
AMA Gülşen MA, Gölçek AG. Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi. OJEMS. July 2019;6(2):259-270. doi:10.17541/optimum.512336
Chicago Gülşen, Mustafa Alpin, and Ali Gökhan Gölçek. “Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi”. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 6, no. 2 (July 2019): 259-70. https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.512336.
EndNote Gülşen MA, Gölçek AG (July 1, 2019) Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 6 2 259–270.
IEEE M. A. Gülşen and A. G. Gölçek, “Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi”, OJEMS, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 259–270, 2019, doi: 10.17541/optimum.512336.
ISNAD Gülşen, Mustafa Alpin - Gölçek, Ali Gökhan. “Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi”. Optimum Ekonomi ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 6/2 (July 2019), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.17541/optimum.512336.
JAMA Gülşen MA, Gölçek AG. Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi. OJEMS. 2019;6:259–270.
MLA Gülşen, Mustafa Alpin and Ali Gökhan Gölçek. “Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi”. Optimum Ekonomi Ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 2, 2019, pp. 259-70, doi:10.17541/optimum.512336.
Vancouver Gülşen MA, Gölçek AG. Rekabetçi Devlet Modelinin Maliye Politikasına İlişkin Teorik Değerlendirmesi. OJEMS. 2019;6(2):259-70.

Please click for the statistics of Google Scholar.