Research Article

Mathematical Reasoning: Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature

Volume: 19 Number: 45 January 30, 2022
Halil Çoban *, Erdoğan Tezci
EN

Mathematical Reasoning: Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the literature on mathematical reasoning. In the WoS (Web of Science) database, 545 publications published in different journals until January 2021 were analyzed by using the bibliometric analysis method. The most used keywords by the authors, bibliographic couplings, and common citations were analyzed and visualized through the Vosviewer software. As a result of the analyses, the most common keywords used by the authors in publications related to the field were found to be “mathematical reasoning”, “problem solving”, and “mathematical thinking”. The prominent universities in the publications in the field of mathematical reasoning were determined as “Brigham Young University”, “Michigan University”, and “Alicante University”. In addition, the most influential journals in the field were “Journal for Research in Mathematics Education”, “Educational Studies in Mathematics”, and “Journal of Educational Psychology”. The most influential authors in the field were “Schoenfeld, A. H.”, “Carpenter T. P.”, and “Geary, D. C.”. Finally, when the publications in the field were analyzed, the prominent countries were found to be the USA, Turkey, and Sweden ; and Indonesia and People’s Republic of China stand out as the origin of publications that have contributed to the field in recent years.

Keywords

Bibliometric Analysis , Mathematical Reasoning , Bibliometric Mapping

References

  1. Al, U., Soydal, İ., & Yalçın, H. (2010). Bibliyometrik özellikleri açısından Bilig’in Değerlendirilmesi. Bilig, 55, 1-20.
  2. Ball, D. L., & Bass, H. (2003). Making mathematics reasonable in school. In (J. Kilpatrick, W. G. Martin, ve D. Schifter Ed.) A research companion to principles and standards for school mathematics, 27-44. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
  3. Bergqvist, T., & Lithner, J. (2012). Mathematical reasoning in teachers’ presentations. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 31(2), 252-269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2011.12.002.
  4. Bragg, L. A., Herbert, S., Loong, E. Y. K., Vale, C., & Widjaja, W. (2016). Primary teachers notice the impact of language on children’s mathematical reasoning. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(4), 523-544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-016-0178-y.
  5. Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(7), 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525.
  6. Garfield, E. (1988). Announcing the SCI Compact disc edition: CD-ROM gigabyte storage technology, novel software, and bibliographic coupling make desktop research and discovery a reality. Current Contents, 22, 3-13.
  7. Hoffman, D. L., & Holbrook, M. B. (1993). The intellectual structure of consumer research: A bibliometric study of author cocitations in the first 15 years of the Journal of Consumer Research. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(4), 505-517.
  8. Kadarisma, G., Nurjaman, A., Sari, I. P., & Amelia, R. (2019). Gender and mathematical reasoning ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 042109. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042109.
  9. Kurnaz, A. (2018). Examining Effects of Mathematical Problem-Solving, Mathematical Reasoning and Spatial Abilities on Gifted Students’ Mathematics Achievement. World Scientific Research, 5(1), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.510.2018.51.37.43.
  10. Lestari, W. & Jailani. (2018). Enhancing an Ability Mathematical Reasoning through Metacognitive Strategies. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1097, 012117. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012117.
APA
Çoban, H., & Tezci, E. (2022). Mathematical Reasoning: Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 19(45), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1062867