Research Article

The Transition Experiences of TADYA Women to Agroecological Living

Volume: 22 Number: 1 February 12, 2025
EN TR

The Transition Experiences of TADYA Women to Agroecological Living

Abstract

This study was conducted using a qualitative research design to explore the experiences of women within the Tahtacıörencik Natural Life Collective (TADYA), located in the Güdül district of Ankara, as they transitioned to an agroecological way of life. Over the course of the research, participant observation was performed at various intervals, and in-depth interviews were conducted with six women. The transcribed interviews were then thematically analyzed using the Atlas.ti software. Based on the analysis, five key themes emerged: the economic empowerment of TADYA women and its broader ramifications; the transformation of the public sphere; a range of psycho-social changes; the role and influence of technology utilization; and, finally, styles of solidarity and conflict resolution within the collective. The findings shed light on the multifaceted impacts of agroecology on women’s daily lives, emphasizing how these experiences can foster empowerment and catalyze broader social change. Overall, the results underscore the potential of agroecological practices to enhance women's agency, support collective collaboration, and drive a more inclusive social transformation.

Keywords

Agroecology , rural women , women empowerment , eco-friendly living

References

  1. Akgül, Ç. (2022). Sürdürülebilir ekolojik denge için modern ve geleneksel üretim yöntemlerinin entegrasyonunda kırsal kadının ve kadın kooperatiflerinin önemi: Afşar Balam Kadın Kooperatifi örneği. Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 57–71.
  2. Ardahan, F. (2015). In Antalya: The factors causing people to go to the village café, the place of origin café and the cafés of the city center. Mediterranean Journal of Humanities, 2, 37–50. https://doi.org/10.13114/MJH.2015214558
  3. Aydın, Z. (2016). Çağdaş tarım sorunu ve yeni köylülük. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi,(43), 43–63.
  4. Başaran, H., & Irmak, E. (2022). Devrek’te yerel ürün üretimi ve yerelde kadın girişimciliğinde kooperatiflerin yeri. Ahi Evran Akademi, 3(1), 19–31.
  5. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2008). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  6. Cacho, M. T., Giraldo, O. F., Aldasoro, M., Morales, H., Ferguson, B. G., Peter Roset, A. K., & Campos, C. (2021). Agroekolojiyi yaygınlaştırmak: Anahtar faktörler ve örnek olgular. In T. Özkaya, M. Y. Yıldız, F. Özden, & U. Kocagöz (Eds.), Agroekoloji: Başka bir tarım mümkün (pp. 167–198). Metis Yayınları.
  7. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Siyasal Kitabevi.
  8. Çağlayan, S. (2012). Anadolu’nun ilk kamusal mekanı: Kahvehane. Muğla Sıtkı Kocaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,(29), 95–110.
  9. Demircan Yıldırım, P. (2020). Kırsal kalkınmada kadın kooperatiflerinin rolü: Ahlatlı Kadın Kooperatifi. ETÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi,(11), 159–170.
  10. Dinçer, G. Ç. (2023). Türkiye’de kadın hareketinde kamusal alan-özel alan ikilemi. Fiscaoeconomia, 7(Cumhuriyetin 100. Yılında Türkiye Ekonomisi Özel Sayısı), 506–525. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1361372
APA
İnekci, R., & Atasü Topcuoğlu, R. (2025). The Transition Experiences of TADYA Women to Agroecological Living. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 22(1), 156-169. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1596471