Mapping 25 Years of Urban Morphology Research: Co-Citation Analysis

Seda Sakar; Kandemir Atçeken

doi:10.26466/opusjsr.1681989

TR EN

Kentsel Morfoloji Araştırmalarının 25 Yıllık Haritası (2000–2025): Web of Science Verilerine Dayalı Bibliyometrik ve Ortak Atıf Analizi

Öz

Kullanıcı ihtiyaçlarına göre biçimlenen kentsel mekânın yapısal ögelerini ve bu ögelerin bir araya geliş biçimlerini çözümlemek, kentsel morfoloji disiplininin temel araştırma alanını oluşturmaktadır. Bu çalışma, 2000–2025 yılları arasında Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında yayımlanmış kentsel morfoloji konulu 1073 araştırmayı inceleyerek, alandaki bilimsel eğilimleri ve tematik yönelimleri ortaya koymayı amaçlamaktadır. Bibliyometrik analiz tekniklerinden biri olan ortak atıf (co-citation) analizi, CiteSpace yazılımı kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Çalışma, kentsel morfoloji literatüründeki tematik kümeleri, bu kümeleri temsil eden temel yayınları ve kümeler arasındaki zamansal ilişkileri belirlemeye olanak tanımaktadır. Analiz sonucunda, literatürün 6 ana tematik küme etrafında şekillendiği belirlenmiştir. “Kentsel formun evrimi”, “tarihsel süreç analizleri”, “kentler”, “kentsel yayılma”, “enformel yerleşimler” ve “yürünebilir kentler” başlıkları, bu alanın güncel araştırma yönelimlerini yansıtan temel temalar olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Bu kümeler, alanın yalnızca fiziksel biçimlere odaklanan durağan analizlerden, çok boyutlu, veri temelli ve toplumsal etkileşime açık araştırma gündemlerine doğru geçiş yaptığını göstermektedir. Zamansal analiz, özellikle 2019 sonrası dönemde temalar arası etkileşimin belirgin biçimde arttığını ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma, kentsel morfolojinin 2000 ile 2025 yılları arasındaki tematik ve zamansal evrimini haritalandırarak, alanın gelişimi ve ortaya çıkan disiplinler arası bağlantıları hakkında içgörüler sunmaktadır

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kentleşme , Kentsel morfoloji , Bibliyometrik Analiz , Ortak Atıf Analizi , Citespace

Mapping 25 Years of Urban Morphology Research: Co-Citation Analysis

Abstract

Urban morphology, as a discipline, focuses on analyzing the structural components of urban space and how these components come together, often in response to user needs. This study aims to identify the scientific trends and thematic trajectories in urban morphology by analyzing 1073 publications indexed in the Web of Science (WoS) database between 2000 and 2025. Co-citation analysis, one of the bibliometric techniques, was conducted using the CiteSpace software. This method allows for the identification of thematic clusters within the urban morphology literature, the key publications representing these clusters, and the temporal relationships among them. The analysis reveals that the literature is shaped around six main thematic clusters: "urban form evolution," "diachronic analysis," "cities," "urban sprawl," "informal settlements," and "walkable cities". These clusters indicate a shift in the field from static analyses focused solely on physical form toward multidimensional, data-driven, and socially engaged research agendas. Temporal analysis further reveals that inter-cluster interaction has significantly increased, particularly after 2019. This study maps the thematic and temporal evolution of urban morphology between 2000 and 2025, offering insights into the field’s development and its emerging interdisciplinary connections.

Keywords

Urbanization , Urban Morphology , Bibliometric Analysis , Co-citation Analysis , CiteSpace

References

Acero, J. A., Koh, E. J. Y., Ruefenacht, L. A., & Norford, L. K. (2021). Modelling the influence of high-rise urban geometry on outdoor thermal comfort in Singapore. Urban Climate, 36, 100775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.-100775
Anguelovski, I., Connolly, J. J. T., Cole, H., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Baró, F., Martin, N., Conesa, D., Shokry, G., del Pulgar, C. P., Ramos, L. A., Matheney, A., Gallez, E., Oscilowicz, E., Máñez, J. L., Sarzo, B., Beltrán, M. A., & Minaya, J. M. (2022). Green gentrification in European and North American cities. Nature Communications, 13(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31572-1
Araldi, A., & Fusco, G. (2019). From the street to the metropolitan region: Pedestrian perspective in urban fabric analysis. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(7), 1243–1263.
Augusto, A., Rafael, S., Coelho, D., & Ferreira, J. (2024). Connecting the dots between urban morphology and the air quality of cities under a changing climate: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 16(1), 18. https://doi.org/-10.3390/su16010018
Boeing, G. (2017). OSMnx: New methods for acquiring, constructing, analyzing, and visualizing complex street networks. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 65, 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.-2017.05.004
Carmona, M., Heath, T., Oc, T., & Tiesdell, S. (2003). Public places - urban spaces: The dimensions of urban design. Architectural Press.
Chang, S., Jiang, Q., & Zhao, Y. (2018). Integrating CFD and GIS into the development of urban ventilation corridors: A case study in Changchun City, China. Sustainability, 10(6), 1814. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061814
Chen, C. (2016). CiteSpace: A practical guide for mapping scientific literature. Nova Publishers.
Chen, C. (2017). Science mapping: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0006
Chen, W., Wu, A. N., & Biljecki, F. (2021). Classification of urban morphology with deep learning: Application on urban vitality. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 90, 101706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2021.101706

Chen, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Knowledge map of urban morphology and thermal comfort: A bibliometric analysis based on CiteSpace. Buildings, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11100427
Conzen, M. R. G. .(1988), Morphogenesis, Morphological regions and secular human agency in the historic townscape as examplified by Lodlow, Academic Press, London, 116 - 142.
Conzen, M. P. (2004). Thinking about urban form: Papers on urban morphology, 1932–1998. Lang.
Dibble, J., Prelorendjos, A., Romice, O., Zanella, M., Strano, E., Pagel, M., & Porta, S. (2019). On the origin of spaces: Morphometric foundations of urban form evolution. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 46(4), 707–730. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399-808317725075
Dittmar, H. (2019). My Kind of City Collected Essays of Hank Dittmar. Island Press
Dovey, K. (2019). Informal settlement as a mode of production. In T. Banerjee & A. Loukaitou-Sideris (Ed.), The New Companion to Urban Design, Taylor and Francis. 139–151. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203731932-15
Dovey, K., & Pafka, E. (2017). What is functional mix? An assemblage approach. Planning Theory and Practice, 18(2), 249–267. https://doi.-org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1281996
Dovey, K., & Pafka, E. (2020). What is walkability? The urban DMA. Urban Studies, 57(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098018819727
Dovey, K., van Oostrum, M., Chatterjee, I., & Shafique, T. (2020). Towards a morphogenesis of informal settlements. Habitat International, 104, 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102240
Fan, H., Yu, Z., Yang, G., Liu, T. Y., Liu, T. Y., Hung, C. H., & Vejre, H. (2019). How to cool hot-humid (Asian) cities with urban trees? An optimal landscape size perspective. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 265, 338–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.11.-027
Fleischmann, M. (2019). momepy: Urban morphology measuring toolkit. Journal of Open Source Software, 4(43), 1807. https://doi.org/10.21-105/joss.01807
Fleischmann, M., Romice, O., & Porta, S. (2021). Measuring urban form: Overcoming terminological inconsistencies for a quantitative and comprehensive morphologic analysis of cities. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 48(8), 2133–2150. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320910444
Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, Technology, and Humanities. A Wiley - Interscience Publication.
Garrison, T. G. (2018). The ancient urban Maya: Neighborhoods, inequality, and built form, by Scott R. Hutson, 2016 [Book review]. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 28(3), 530–532. Cambridge University Press (CUP). https://doi.org/10.1017/s0959774318000112
Gauthiez, B. (2004). The history of urban morphology. Urban Morphology, 8(2), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.513
Hodos, T. (2017). The Routledge handbook of archaeology and globalization. Routledge.
Hofmeister, B. (2004). The study of urban form in Germany. Urban Morphology, 8(1), 3–12.
Kamalipour, H. (2020). Improvising places: The fluidity of space in informal settlements. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062293
Kamalipour, H., & Dovey, K. (2019). Mapping the visibility of informal settlements. Habitat International, 85, 63–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/-j.habitatint.2019.01.002
Kamalipour, H., & Dovey, K. (2020). Incremental production of urban space: A typology of informal design. Habitat International, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102133
Kleinberg, J. (2002). Bursty and hierarchical structure in streams. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024940629314
Knox, P. L., & Mayer, H. (2013). Small Town Sustainability. Birkhäuser
Koehler, W. (2001). Information science as “Little Science”: The implications of a bibliometric analysis of the Journal of the American Society for Information Science. In Dordrecht Scientometrics, and Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, 51(1). Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Köseoğlu, E., & Burkut, E. B. (2023). Kentsel morfoloji ve sağlık arasındaki ilişkinin bibliyometrik analizi. Türkiye Kentsel Morfoloji Ağı, 155–167.
Kropf, K. (2017). The Handbook of Urban Morphology. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Larkham, P., & Jones A. N. (1991), Glossary of Urban Form, University of Birmingham.
Logan, T. M., Hobbs, M. H., Conrow, L. C., Reid, N. L., Young, R. A., & Anderson, M. J. (2022). The x-minute city: Measuring the 10, 15, 20-minute city and an evaluation of its use for sustainable urban design. Cities, 131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2022.103924
Majic, I., & Pafka, E. (2019). AwaP-IC—An Open-Source GIS Tool for Measuring Walkable Access. Urban Science, 3(48). https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci3020048
Moreno, C., Allam, Z., Chabaud, D., Gall, C., & Pratlong, F. (2021). Introducing the “15-Minute City”: Sustainability, Resilience and Place Identity in Future Post-Pandemic Cities. Smart Cities, 4, 93–111. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities
Moudon, A. V. (1997). Urban morphology as an emerging interdisciplinary field. Urban Morphology, 1, 3–10.
Nor, M. M., Mohd Noor, N., & Asmawi, M. Z. (2021). Bibliometric analysis on street network components in influencing genome of urban morphologies. Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment, 11(1), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.31436/japcm.v11i1.440
Oliveira, V. (2013). Morpho: a methodology for assessing urban form. Urban Morphology, 17(1), 21–33.
Oliveira, V. (2016). Urban Morphology: An Introduction to the Study of the Physical Form of Cities. Springer.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical Bibliography or Bibliometrics?. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
Sadeghi, G., & Li, B. (2019). Urban Morphology: Comparative Study of Different Schools of Thought. Current Urban Studies, 07(04), 562–572. https://doi.org/10.4236/cus.2019.74029
Shi, Y., Xie, X., Fung, J. C. H., & Ng, E. (2018). Identifying critical building morphological design factors of street-level air pollution dispersion in high-density built environment using mobile monitoring. Building and Environment, 128, 248–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2017.11.043
Siyavuş, A. E., & Aydın, T. N. (2021). A bibliometric analysis of urban sprawl. Papers in Applied Geography, 8(2), 163–184. https://doi.org/10.-1080/23754931.2021.1975307
Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The Structure of Scientific Literatures I: Identifying and Graphing Specialties. Science Studies 4, 17–40.
Taubenböck, H., Kraff, N. J., & Wurm, M. (2018). The morphology of the arrival City - A global categorization based on literature surveys and remotely sensed data. Applied Geography, 92, 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2018.02.002
Tomaszewski, R. (2023). Visibility, impact, and applications of bibliometric software tools through citation analysis. Scientometrics, 128(7), 4007–4028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04725-2
Wang, Y. (2021). Overview of development and recent trends in bibliometrics and research evaluation. International Journal of Librarianship, 6(1), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.23974/ijol.2021.vol6.1.195
Whitehand, J. W. R. (2001a). British urban morphology: The Conzenian tradition. Urban Morphology, 5(2), 103–109.
Whitehand, J. W. R. (2001b). The Physical Form of Cities: A Historico-Geographical Approach. In R. Paddison (Ed.), Handbook of Urban Studies, 69–87. Sage Publications.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Political Science (Other)

Journal Section

Systematic Reviews and Meta Analysis

Authors

Seda Sakar ^*
Türkiye

Kandemir Atçeken
0000-0002-7131-0968
Türkiye

Early Pub Date

May 27, 2025

Publication Date

May 31, 2025

Submission Date

April 29, 2025

Acceptance Date

May 27, 2025

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 22 Number: 3

DOI

https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1681989

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA96NY62UM

APA

Sakar, S., & Atçeken, K. (2025). Mapping 25 Years of Urban Morphology Research: Co-Citation Analysis. OPUS Journal of Society Research, 22(3), 518-531. https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1681989