The role of power-differences and identification in the relationship between contact and solidarity-based collective action
Abstract
One of the primary aims of the present study is to examine the mediating role of communication about sectarian power differences in the association between Sunnis’ social contact with Alevis and their willingness to engage in collective action in support of Alevi rights. A second aim is to investigate whether the direct and indirect effects of intergroup contact on willingness to engage in collective action vary as a function of participants’ level of identification with the Sunni ingroup. Survey data collected from 332 Sunni participants in Türkiye were analysed using a moderated mediation model. The findings indicate that higher-quality contact with Alevis is associated with more frequent discussions of power inequalities between Alevi and Sunni sects during interaction, which in turn predicts stronger willingness among Sunnis to engage in collective action on behalf of Alevi rights. Moreover, the results show that identification with the Sunni ingroup moderates the association between power-focused communication and collective action, such that this positive relationship weakens and becomes non-significant at higher levels of ingroup identification. Taken together, these findings demonstrate that communication about power inequalities plays a critical role in transforming intergroup contact into collective action, while strong identification with the Sunni ingroup systematically constrains both the direct and indirect effects of contact on collective action intentions.
Keywords
advantaged/disadvanted group, Intergroup contact, collective action, communication, power differences, Sunnis/Alevis.
Ethical Statement
References
- Akbaş, G. (2010). Social identity and intergroup relations: The case of Alevis and Sunnis living in Amasya [Unpublished master’s thesis]. Middle East Technical University.
- Bikmen, N., & Sunar, D. (2013). Difficult dialogs: Majority group members’ willingness to talk about inequality with different minority groups. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 37(4), 467–476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2012.11.002
- Caricati, L., Owuamalam, C. K., Bonetti, C., Rubin, M., & Spears, R. (2025). The relationship between social identification and system justification: A meta-analytic test of relevant moderators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 55(7), 1232–1251.
- Cocco, V. M., Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Di Bernardo, G. A., & Dovidio, J. F. (2024). Mobilizing or sedative effects? A narrative review of the association between intergroup contact and collective action among advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 28(2), 119–180.
- Çakal, H., Hewstone, M., Güler, M., & Heath, A. (2016). Predicting support for collective action in the conflict between Turks and Kurds: Perceived threats as a mediator of intergroup contact and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(6), 732–752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216641303
- Di Bernardo, G. A., Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., McKeown, S., Cocco, V. M., Saguy, T., & Dixon, J. (2021). Fostering social change among advantaged and disadvantaged-group members: Integrating intergroup contact and social identity perspectives on collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24, 26–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219889134
- Dixon, J., Cakal, H., Khan, W., Osmany, M., Majumdar, S., & Hassan, M. (2017). Contact, political solidarity and collective action: An Indian case study of relations between historically disadvantaged communities. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27, 83–95. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2296
- Ellemers, N., Kortekaas, P., & Ouwerkerk, J. W. (1999). Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2–3), 371–389.
- Hasbún López, P., Martinović, B., Bobowik, M., Chryssochoou, X., Cichocka, A., Ernst-Vintila, A., ... Lamberty, P. (2019). Support for collective action against refugees: The role of national, European, and global identifications, and autochthony beliefs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(7), 1439–1455. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2608
- Hässler, T., Ullrich, J., Bernardino, M., Shnabel, N., Van Laar, C., Valdenegro, D., ... Ditlmann, R. K. (2020). A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4), 380–386. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0815-z