Öz Merhamet, Dışsal Motivasyon, İçsel Motivasyon ve Performans Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi: Tekstil Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Year 2023, Volume: 20 Issue: 53, 364 - 374, 30.05.2023

Mecbure Aslan

https://doi.org/10.26466/opusjsr.1281592

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Öz-şefkat kavramı pozitif psikolojinin bir parçası olarak görülmekte olup son zamanlarda örgütsel davranış alan yazınında güncel bir konu haline gelmiştir Öz-şefkat, bireyin kendine karşı olumlu, sevgi dolu ve kabullenici tutumudur. Örgütlerde çalışanların öz-şefkat düzeyleri çalışanların yaptığı işe ilişkin içsel motivasyonlarını ve performanslarını olumlu yönde etkileyebilecektir. Öz-şefkatin dışsal motivasyon ve içsel motivasyon ilişkisinde düzenleyici bir etkisi olabileceği de beklenmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, öz-şefkat, dışsal motivasyon, içsel motivasyon, performans değişkenleri arasındaki ilişkilerin ve etkileşimlerin incelenmesidir. Değişkenler arasındaki etkileşimler düzenleyicilik ve aracılık modeli kapsamında ele alınmıştır. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Anket tekniği kullanılarak veriler elde edilmiştir. Ulaşılabilirlık, zaman, maliyet kısıtları nedeniyle kolayda örneklem yöntemiyle katılımcılara ulaşılmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Kahramanmaraş ilindeki tekstil işletmelerinde çalışanlar oluşturmakta olup 393 katılımcıdan veriler toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde SPSS 25.0 ve Process Macro programları kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda değişkenler arasında pozitif yönlü ilişkiler olduğu görülmüştür. Kurulan modelleri test etmek için yapılan analiz ile öz-şefkatin dışsal motivasyon ile içsel motivasyon arasında moderatör bir role sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bununla birlikte öz-şefkatin performans üzerindeki etkisinde içsel motivasyonun kısmi aracılık rolüne sahip olduğu bulunmuştur.Ulaşılan bulgular yazın bağlamında tartışılmış ve yapılacak çalışmalar için önerilerde bulunulmuştur

Keywords

Öz-şefkat, Dışsal Motivasyon, İçsel Motivasyon, Performans

Investigation of Relationship between Self-Compassion, Extrinsic Motivation, Intrinsic Motivation and Performance: A Research in the Textile Sector

Abstract

The concept of self-compassion is seen as a part of positive psychology and has recently become a current topic in the organizational behavior literature. Self-compassion is an individual's positive, loving and accepting attitude towards oneself. Self-compassion levels of employees in organizations can positively affect their intrinsic motivation and performance regarding their work. It is also predicted that it regulates the relationship between self-compassion, extrinsic motivation and intrinsic motivation. The aim of this study is to examine the relationships and interactions between self-compassion, extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, and performance variables. The interactions between the variables are handled within the scope of the moderating and mediating model. Quantitative research method was used in the research. Data were obtained using the questionnaire technique. Due to accessibility, time and cost constraints, the participants were reached with the convenience sampling method. The sample of the research consists of the employees in the textile businesses in Kahramanmaraş and data were collected from 393 participants. SPSS 25.0 and Process Macro programs were used in the analysis of the data. As a result of the research, it was seen that there were positive relations between the variables. With the analysis made to test the established models, it was determined that self-compassion had a moderator role between extrinsic motivation and intrinsic motivation. With this, it was found that intrinsic motivation had a partial mediating role in the effect of self-compassion on performance.The findings were discussed in the context of the literature and suggestions were made for future studies.

Keywords

Self-compassion, Extrinsic Motivation, Intrinsic Motivation, Performance.

References

• Aslan, M., & Doğan, S. (2020). Dışsal motivasyon, içsel motivasyon ve performans etkileşimine kuramsal bir bakış. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 11(26), 291-301.
• Barnard, L. K., & Curry, J. F. (2011). Self-compassion: Conceptualizations, correlates, & interventions. Review of General Psychology, 15(4), 289-303.
• Borman. W. C, & Motowidlo, S. J. (1993). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. In N. Schmitt & W. Borman (Eds.), Personnel selection in organizations (pp. 71-98). New York: Jossey-Bass.
• Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99-109.
• Borman, W. C. (2004). The concept of organizational citizenship. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(6), 238-241.
• Breines, J. G. & Chen, S. (2012). Self-compassion increases selfimprovement motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38, 1133–1143.
• Chan, Y. H. (2003). Biostatistics 101: data presentation. Singapore Medical Journal, 44(6), 280-285.
• Deci, E. L. (1971). The effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality And Social Psychology, 18, 105-115.
• Deci, E .L. (1972). The effect of contingent and noncontingent rewards and control on intrinsic motivation. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 8, 217-229.
• Deci, E. L. Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., and Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 325¬-346.
• Dundas, I., Binder, P., Hansen, T. G. B., & Stige, S. H. (2017). Does a short self-compassion intervention for students increase healthy self-regulation? A randomized control trial. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58(5), 443-450.
• Dutton, J. E., Workman, K. M., & Hardin, A. E. (2014). Compassion at work. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), 277-304.
• Egan, H., O’hara, M., Cook, A., & Mantzios, M. (2022). Mindfulness, self-compassion, resiliency and wellbeing in higher education: a recipe to increase academic performance. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 46(3), 301-311.
• Eisenberger, R. ve Shanock, L. (2003). Rewards, intrinsic motivation and creativity: A case study of conceptual and methodological isolation. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2/3), 121-130.
• Gilbert, P. (2010). The compassionate mind. London: Constable & Robinson Ltd.
• Jennings, R. E., Lanaj, K., & Kim, Y. J. (2022). Self-Compassion at work: A self-regulation perspective on its beneficial effects for work performance and wellbeing. Personnel Psychology, 31(4), 665-699.
• Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W.(1998) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, USA: Prentice Hall.
• Kilis, S., & Yıldırım, Z. (2018). Sorgulayici öğrenme topluluğu üst biliş ölçeğinin türkçeye uyarlanmasi: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 665-679.
• Killham, M. E., Mosewich, A. D., Mack, D. E., Gunnell, K. E. & Ferguson, L. J. (2018). Women athletes’ self- compassion, self-criticism, and perceived sport performance. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 7(3), 297- 307.
• Kotera, Y., Taylor, E., Fido, D., Williams, D., & Tsuda-McCaie, F. (2021). Motivation of UK graduate students in education: Self-compassion moderates pathway from extrinsic motivation to intrinsic motivation. Current Psychology, 1-14.
• Künye, N., & Aydıntan, B. (2020). Öz-şefkat ile iş tatmini arasındaki ilişkide içsel motivasyonun aracı rolü. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(3), 3159-3169.
• Liu, I. F. (2020). The impact of extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation, and social self-efficacy on English competition participation intentions of pre-college learners: Differences between high school and vocational students in Taiwan. Learning and Motivation, 72, 101675.
• MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
• Neff, K. (2003a). Self-Compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a health attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity. 2(2), 85-101
• Neff, K. D. (2003b). The development and validation of a scale to measure self compassion. Self and Identity, 2(3), 223-250.
• Neff, K. D. (2011). Self-compassion, self-esteem, and well-being. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(1), 1-12.
• Neff, K. D. (2023). Self-compassion: Theory, method, research, and intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 74, 193-218.
• Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y. P., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4(3), 263-287.
• Neshat, Y. A. & Fakhri, S. L. (2011). Designing the work motivation model staff employee of offshore oil company. International Conference On Social Science And Humanity, IACSIT Press, 5, 437-441.
• Ommering, B. W., & Dekker, F. W. (2017). Medical students’ intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation to engage in research as preparation for residency. Perspectives on Medical Education, 6, 366-368.
• Ortiz, A., Goold, A., & Zhang, J. W. (2023). Self-Compassion, Personal Improvement, and Motivation. In Handbook of Self-Compassion (pp. 201-211). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
• Özdamar K (2015): Paket programları ile istatistiksel veri analizi-1. Yenilenmiş 10. Baskı, Ankara: Nisan Kitabevi.
• Robbins, S.P. & Judge, T.A. (2015). Örgütsel davranış. (Çeviri Edt. İnci Erdem), Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Polatcı, S., & Baygın, E. (2022). Öz-Şefkatin görev performansı üzerindeki etkisinde psikolojik sermayenin aracılık rolü. İş ve İnsan Dergisi, 9(1), 15-29.
• Shao, A. T. (2002). Marketing Research: An Aid to Decision Making, Cincinnati, Ohio: South-Western/Thomson Learning.
• Strauss, C., Taylor, B. L., Gu, J., Kuyken, W., Baer, R., Jones, F., & Cavanagh, K. (2016). What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 15-27.
• Van Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525-531.
• Van Scotter, J. R., Motowidlo, S. J. & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 526-535