Son 10 yılda morfoloji: bibliyometrik bir analiz

Abstract

Amaç: Morfoloji yapı, fonksiyon ve gelişme bilimidir. Bu bilim alanında pek çok farklı disiplin çalışmaktadır. Bibliyometrik analiz yazar, ülke, üniversite gibi faktörlerin üretkenliğini, etkililiğini ve performansını inceleyen bir yöntemdir. Gereç ve yöntem: Bu çalışmada son 10 yılda morfoloji alanında yapılan araştırmalar bibliyometrik olarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Son 10 yılda 83214 çalışmanın yapıldığı, ülke olarak en fazla çalışmanın Amerika Birleşik Devletleri Toronto Üniversitesi Temerty Tıp Fakültesi'nde yapıldığı ve SCI-Expanded indeksi analiz edildi. Elsevier yayınevi en çok kullanılan yayınevi olup sinir bilimi ise en fazla yayına sahip bilim alanıdır. Sonuç: Tarih boyunca diğer bilim dallarına ışık tutan morfoloji alanında yapılan çalışmalar son 10 yılda artış göstermektedir. Çalışmamızda gelecekte morfoloji alanında araştırma yapacak bilim insanlarına yol gösterilmesi amaçlanmaktadır.

Keywords

• Morfoloji
• bibliyometrik analiz
• tıp

Morphology in the last 10 years: a bibliometric analysis

Abstract

Purpose: Morphology is the science of structure, function and development. Many different disciplines work in this field of science. Bibliometric analysis is a method that examines the productivity, efficiency and performance of factors such as author, country and university. Materials and methods: In this study, the researches conducted in the field of morphology in the last 10 years were analyzed bibliometrically. Results: It was analyzed that 83214 studies were conducted in the last 10 years, the most studies were conducted at the Temerty Faculty of Medicine of the University of Toronto, the United States of America as the country and SCI-Expanded index. Elsevier publishing house is the most used publishing house and neuroscience is the field of science with the highest number of publications. Conclusion: Studies in the field of morphology, which has shed light on other branches of science throughout history, have been increasing in the last 10 years. In our study, it is aimed to guide scientists who will conduct research in the field of morphology in the future.

Keywords

• Morphology
• bibliometric analysis
• medicine

References

1. 1. Czarnecki PG, Shah JV. The ciliary transition zone: from morphology and molecules to medicine. Trends in Cell Biology 2012:22:201-210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2012.02.001
2. 2. Rees G. Medicine: “Morphology is a witness which doesn’t lie”: Diagnosis by similarity relation and analogical inference in clinical forensic medicine. Social Science & Medicin 2011:73:866-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.032
3. 3. Musumeci G. Progress for journal of functional morphology and kinesiology in 2020. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2021;6:11(e1-4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk6010011
4. 4. Bahşi İ, Adanır SS, Kervancıoğlu P, Orhan M, Govsa F. Bibliometric analysis of Turkey’s research activity in the anatomy and morphology category from the web of science database. Eur J Ther 2021;27:268-280. https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther-27-4-108
5. 5. Horata E. Bibliometric analysis of the Top 100 most cited articles on the thalamus anatomy. MSD 2024;11:89-98. https://doi.org/10.36472/msd.v11i3.1141
6. 6. Kundakcı YE, Atay E. Bibliometric and visualized analysis of global research on technology in anatomy education from 1987 to 2021. Eur J Anat 2023;27:517-528. https://doi.org/10.52083/HNNY3374
7. 7. Iman AF, Handayani S, Munawaroh S, Wiyono N. Bibliometric review of anatomical terminology. Open Access Maced J Med Sci 2023;11:236-242. https://doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2023.11259
8. 8. Aria M, Cuccurullo C. bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics 2017;11:959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

9. 9. Adnan S, Ullah R. Top-cited articles in regenerative endodontics: a bibliometric analysis. J Endod 2018;44:1650-1664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joen.2018.07.015
10. 10. Adanır SS, Bahşi İ, Kervancıoğlu P, Orhan M, Cihan ÖF. Bibliometric analysis of articles published in Anatomy, the official publication of the Turkish Society of Anatomy and Clinical Anatomy between 2007–2018. Anatomy 2020;14:39-43. https://doi.org/10.2399/ana.20.019
11. 11. Eyre Walker A, Stoletzki N. The assessment of science: the relative merits of post-publication review, the impact factor, and the number of citations. PLOS Biolog 2013;11:e1001675. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001675
12. 12. Mishra L, Kim HC, Singh NR, Rath PP. The top 10 most-cited articles on the management of fractured instruments: a bibliometric analysis. Restor Dent Endod 2018;44:e2. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2019.44.e2
13. 13. Thompson DF. Bibliometric analysis of pharmacology publications in the united states: a state-level evaluation. Journal of Scientometric Research 2018;7:167-172. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires.7.3.27
14. 14. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84:523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
15. 15. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAVA 2016;315:801-810. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.0287
16. 16. Petekkaya E, Karadağ M, Dokur M. Bibliometric and altmetric analysis of publications examining education methods in realm of anatomy. 2021;7:391-408. Eur Res J https://doi.org/10.18621/eurj.776229
17. 17. Li Z, Li Z, Peng C, Zhao M, He Q. A Bibliometric analysis of virtual reality in anatomy teaching between 1999 and 2022. Front Educ 2022;7:874406. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.874406
18. 18. Panigel M. Gynaecology: Anatomy and morphology. Clin Obst Gynaecology 1986;13:421-445. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0306-3356(21)00027-3
19. 19. Macalister A. A text-book of human anatomy: systematic and topographical, including the embryology, histology and morphology of man, with special reference to the requirements of practical surgery and medicine/ by Alexander Macalister. London, Griffin, 1889.
20. 20. Tekin AM, Bahşi I. Global research on maxillofacial fracture over the last 40 years: a bibliometric study. Brief Clinical Studies 2021;32:e568-e572. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007627
21. 21. Kumar M, George RJ, Anisha PS. Bibliometric analysis for medical research. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine 2023;45:277-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/02537176221103617
22. 22. Rueff Barroso CR, Sepulchro LCC, Delpupo FVB, et al. Profile analysis of the scientific articles published in the journal of morphological sciences between 2000 and 2017: a bibliometric study. JMS Bibliometric Study 2018;35:255-260. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1676541
23. 23. Narin F. Policy P. Bibliometric techniques in the evaluation of research programs. Science and Public Policy 1987;14:99-106.
24. 24. Bahşi A, Zengin O. A bibliometric analysis of Turkish research activity in the rheumatology category of the web of science database. 2021;27:299-310. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurjther.2021.21020
25. 25. Gürbüz Y, Süğün TS, Özaksar K. A bibliometric analysis of orthopedic publications originating from Turkey. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2015;49:57-66. https://doi.org/10.3944/AOTT.2015.14.0044
26. 26. Li Y, Xu G, Long X, Ho YS. A bibliometric analysis of classic publications in web of science category of orthopedics. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research 2019;14:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1247-1
27. 27. Liao H, Tang M, Luo L, Li C, Chiclana F, Zeng XJ. A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability 2018;10:166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166
28. 28. Zeybek V, Karabağ G, Yavuz MS. Türkiye’den adli tip alaninda yapilmiş yayinlarin bibliyometrik analizi. Adli Tıp Bülteni 2022;27:218-224. https://doi.org/10.17986/blm.1587
29. 29. Thompson DF, Walker CKJ. A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences. 2015;35:551-559. https://doi.org/10.1002/phar.1586
30. 30. Budd JM. A bibliometric analysis of higher education literature. Research in Higher Education 1988;28:180-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00992890