Research Article

Examining the Digital Learning Material Preparation Competencies of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers

Volume: 8 Number: 3 August 1, 2021
EN

Examining the Digital Learning Material Preparation Competencies of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers

Abstract

The aim of this research is to examine digital learning materials designed by pre-service mathematics teachers with GeoGebra software through rubrics. This research was conducted using the integrative mixed method design, which allows the use of qualitative and quantitative methods together or sequentially. The study group of the research consists of 46 pre-service teachers studying in elementary mathematics education programme and attending the Computer-Assisted Mathematics Instruction course in a university. The pre-service teachers designed the materials in groups of two (23 participant per group). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with six groups determined according to the purposeful sampling selection. The data of this research were obtained using digital learning materials and semi-structured interview form used to interview pre-service teachers. Pre-service teachers were asked to prepare a material that can be used in teaching simple fractions addition with GeoGebra software. In line with the purpose of the study, the Digital Learning Material Evaluation Rubric has been developed by the researchers. When the Digital Learning Material Evaluation Rubric scores of the pre-service teachers who participated in the study were examined, it was found that there were deficiencies in the digital learning material design skills of the pre-service teachers. Pre-service teachers were less successful in terms of teaching appropriateness than structural appropriateness and programming appropriateness aspects of the digital learning materials produced.

Keywords

mathematics teaching , digital materials , GeoGebra , evaluation by rubric

References

  1. Akçay, H., Tüysüz, C., Feyzioğlu, B., & Oğuz, B. (2008). Bilgisayar tabanlı ve bilgisayar destekli kimya öğretiminin öğrenci tutum ve başarısına etkisi. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(2), 169-181.
  2. Aktepe, V. (2011). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin derslerinde bilgisayarı kullanımlarına ilişkin görüşleri. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(3), 75-92.
  3. Baki, A., Aydın Yalçınkaya, H., Özpınar, İ., & Çalık Uzun, S. (2009). İlköğretim matematik öğretmenleri ve öğretmen adaylarının öğretim teknolojilerine bakışlarının karşılaştırılması. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 1(1), 65-83.
  4. Bayam, S. B. (2014). Matematik eğitiminde matematik tarihi gerekliliğinin felsefi temelleri ve gerçekçi matematik eğitiminde matematik tarihinin önemi. Dört Öge, (5), 233-244.
  5. Bayturan, S. (2011). Ortaöğretim matematik eğitiminde bilgisayar destekli öğretimin, öğrencilerin başarıları, tutumları ve bilgisayar öz-yeterlik algıları üzerindeki etkisi [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Dokuz Eylul University, Institute of Educational Sciences, İzmir.
  6. Biber, A. Ç., Tuna, A., & Aktaş, O. (2013). Öğrencilerin kesirler konusundaki kavram yanılgıları ve bu yanılgıların kesir problemleri çözümlerine etkisi. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(2). Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/trkefd/issue/21474/230175
  7. Bryman, A. (2007). Barriers to integrating quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 8-22.
  8. Buteau, C., Jarvis, D. H., & Lavicza, Z. (2014). On the integration of computer algebra systems (CAS) by Canadian mathematicians: Results of a national survey. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 14(1), 35-57.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  10. Conover, W. J. (1999). Practical nonparametric statistics (Third ed.). Wiley: USA.
APA
Şimşek, M., & Yazıcı, N. (2021). Examining the Digital Learning Material Preparation Competencies of Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers. Participatory Educational Research, 8(3), 323-343. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.21.68.8.3