Corrective Parties and Conveyor Coalitions: Explaining the Rise of Third Parties in European Politics

Abstract

Third parties have grown increasingly relevant in European politics in recent years, with the rise of status-quo changing parties such as Podemos in Spain, Syriza in Greece, UKIP in Britain and the Front National in France. This article aims to bridge the gap in the comparative politics literature by introducing two new types of third parties in European politics through their bargaining and mediation, crisis behavior and electoral appeal. In doing so, this study proposes that leadership cult, localization of support and rigidness of ideology varies across third parties, due to the existence of two types of third parties; conveyor coalitions and corrective parties. The article uses the case studies of Syriza and Podemos as ‘conveyor coalitions’ and of the Front National and UKIP as ‘corrective parties’. By introducing these two new concepts, the article attempts to bestow future scholarly studies with better tools for predicting and studying rapidly rising populist parties

Keywords

• Party Politics, Third Parties, European Politics, Electoral Behavior, Corrective Parties, Conveyor Coalitions

References

1. Paul Allen Beck, “The Dealignment Era in America”, in Russell J. Dalton, Scott C. Flanagan, and Paul Allen Beck (eds.), Advanced Industrial Democracies: Realignment or Dealignment, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press, 1984; Norman H Nie, Sidney Verba, and John R. Petrocik, The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1979; Martin Wattenberg, The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-1994, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1996.
2. Andrew Blais and Kenneth Carty, “Does Proportional Representation Foster Voter Turnout?”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 18 (1990), pp. 167-181; Steven J. Rosenstone, Roy L. Behr and Edward H. Lazarus, Third Parties in America: Citizen Response to Major Party Failure, Princeton, NJ., Princeton University Press, 1984.
3. James Enelow and Melvin J. Hinch, “A New Approach to Voter uncertainty in the Downsian Spatial Model”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25 (1981), pp. 483-93; Daniel Ingberman, “Incumbent Reputations and Ideological Campaign Contributions in Spatial Competition” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, Vol. 16 (1992), pp. 147- 169.
4. J. David Gillespie, Challengers to Duopoly: Why Third Parties Matter in American Two- party Politics, Columbia, SC, University of South Carolina Press, 2012; Timothy M Peterson, “Third-Party Trade, Political Similarity, and Dyadic Conflict”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 48 No. 2 (2012), pp. 185-200; Shiego Hirano, James M. Snyder Jr., Stephen Daniel Ansolabehere and John Mark Hansen, “Primary Elections and Partisan Polarization in the U.S. Congress”, Quarterly Journal of Political Science, Vol. 5, No. 2 (2010) pp. 169-191.
5. Charles D. Hadley, Michael Morass and Rainer Nick, “Federalism and Party Interaction in West Germany, Switzerland and Austria”, Publius, Vol. 19, No. 4 (1989), pp. 81-97; Hans-Dieter Klingemann and Martin P. Wattenberg, “Decaying Versus Developing Party Systems: A Comparison of Party Images in the United States and West Germany”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 22 (1991), pp. 131-149
6. Daniel Oesch, “Explaining Workers’ Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland”, International Political Science Review, Vol. 29 (2008), pp. 349-373; Maurice Duverger, “Public Opinion and Political Parties in France”, The American Political Science Review, Vol. 46, No. 4 (1952), pp. 1069-1078.
7. Garry Tregidga, The Liberal Party in South-West Britain since 1918: Political Decline, Dormancy and Rebirth, Quebec, Presses Université Laval, 2000.
8. Patrick Seyd, “New parties/new politics? A case study of the British Labour Party”, Party Politics, Vol. 5 No. 3 (1999), pp. 383- 405.

9. Anika Gauja, The Politics of Party Policy: From Members to Legislators, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2013.
10. Philip Barnes, “Developing A New Post-Liberal Paradigm for British Religious Education”, Journal of Beliefs and Values, Vol. 2, No.1 (2007), pp. 17-32.
11. James Mitchell, Lynn Bennie and Rob Johns, The Scottish National Party: Transition to Power, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012.
12. Kathleen Bawn, “Voter Responses to Electoral Complexity: Ticket Splitting, Rational Voters and Representation in the Federal Republic of Germany”, British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 29, No. 3 (1999), pp. 487-505.
13. Jonathan Olsen, “Past Imperfect, Future Tense: The SPD before and after the 2013 Federal Election”, German Politics & Society, Vol. 32, No. 3 (2014), pp. 46-58.
14. Matthias Mader and Harald Schoen, “Chancellor Merkel, the European Debt Crisis and the AfD: An Analysis of Voting Behaviour in the 2013 Federal Election”, in Germany After the 2013 Elections: Breaking the Mould of Post-Unification Politics, Bamberg, University of Bamberg Publications, 2015.
15. Harold D. Clarke, “The Politics of Austerity: Modeling British Attitudes Towards Public Spending Cuts”, in Norman Schofield, Gonzalo Caballero and Daniel Kselman (eds.), Advances in Political Economy, Heidelberg, Springer, 2013. pp. 265-287.
16. Vernon L. Lidtke, Outlawed Party: Social Democracy in Germany, Princeton, NJ. Princeton University Press, 2015.
17. Kai Arzheimer, “The AfD: Finally a Successful Right-Wing Populist Eurosceptic Party for Germany?”, West European Politics, Vol. 38, No. 3 (2015), pp. 535-556.
18. Peter Mair and Gordon Smith, Understanding Party System Change in Western Europe, London, Routledge, 2013.
19. James Hollifield, Philip Martin and Pia Orrenius, Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, Stanford, Stanford University Press, 2014.
20. Paul Hainsworth and Paul Mitchell, “France: The Front National from Crossroads to Crossroads?”, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 53, No. 3 (2000), pp. 443-456.
21. Stanley Hoffmann, “Gaullism by Any Other Name”, Foreign Policy, Vol. 57 (1984), pp. 38-57.
22. Jan Tomicki, Polska Partia Socjalistyczna, 1892-1948, Warsaw, Książka i Wiedza, 1983.
23. Richard Heffernan, New Labour and Thatcherism: Political Change in Britain, London, Palgrave Macmillan, 2000.
24. Reimar Zeh, Wie viele Fans hat Angela Merkel? Wahlkampf in Social Network Sites, Die Massenmedien im Wahlkampf, Berlin, VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, 2010, pp. 245- 257.
25. Michael Lewis-Beck and Glenn E. Mitchell, “French Electoral Theory: The National Front Test”, Electoral Studies, Vol. 12, No. 2 (1993), pp. 112-127.
26. Sebastiaan Faber, “Fighting the New Fascism: Juan Carlos Monedero on PODEMOS, Spain’s New Political Force”, The Volunteer, Vol. 31, No. 3 (Spring 2014), pp. 15-18.
27. Yanni Stavrakakis and Giorgos Katsambekis, “Left-wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA”, Journal of Political Ideologies, Vol. 19, No. 2 (2014), pp. 119-142.
28. Mads Dagnis Jensen and Holly Snaith, “When Politics Prevails: The Political Economy of A Brexit”, Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 23, No. 9 (2016), pp. 1-9.
29. “Smith: ‘A Brexit would reopen the question of Scottish independence’”, at http://www. euractiv.com/section/uk-europe/interview/smith-a-brexit-would-reopen-the-question- of-scottish-independence/ (last visited 9 October 2016).
30. Nicole Berbuir, Marcel Lewandowsky and Jasmin Siri, “The AfD and its Sympathisers: Finally a Right-Wing Populist Movement in Germany?”, German Politics, Vol. 24, No. 2 (2015), pp. 154-178.
31. “A comparison of Germany’s AfD and France’s National Front”, Deutsche Welle, at http://dw.com/p/1IlnY (last visited 9 October 2016).
32. Stavrakakis, and Katsambekis, “Left-wing populism in the European periphery”, pp. 119-142.
33. Cristina Flesher Fominaya, “Spain is different: Podemos and 15-M”, Open Democracy, Vol. 29 (2014).
34. David Roman and Matt Moffett, “Spanish Antiausterity Party Podemos Holds Massive Rally in Madrid”, Wall Street Journal, 31 January 2015.
35. Meike Dülffer, Carsten Luther and Zacharias Zacharakis, “Caught in the Web of the Russian Ideologues”, Die Zeit, 7 February 2015.
36. “Podemos: Spain Anti-austerity Party Banging on Doors of Power”, BBC News, at http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-35150771 (last visited 9 October 2016).
37. Michael Lowy and Francis Sitel, “The Far Right in France: The Front National in European Perspective”, Socialist Register, Vol. 52, No. 52 (2015), pp. 51-67.
38. John Evans, P. Burrin and C. Schori-Liang, “‘La politique du dehors avec les raisons du dedans’: Foreign and Defence Policy of the French Front National”, Europe for the Europeans: The Foreign and Security Policy of the Populist Radical Right, London, Routledge, 2013, p. 125.
39. Karine Tournier-Sol, “Reworking the Eurosceptic and Conservative Traditions into a Populist Narrative: UKIP’s Winning Formula?”, Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 53, No. 1 (2015), pp. 140-156.
40. Robert Ford, Matthew J. Goodwin and David Cutts, “Strategic Eurosceptics and polite xenophobes: Support for the United Kingdom Independence Party (UKIP) in the 2009 European Parliament Elections”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 51, No. 2 (2012), pp. 204-234.
41. Andrew Geddes, “The EU, UKIP and the Politics of Immigration in Britain”, The Political Quarterly, Vol. 85, No. 3 (2014), pp. 289-295.
42. Daniel J. Della Posta, “Competitive Threat, Intergroup Contact, or both? Immigration and the Dynamics of Front National Voting in France”, Social Forces, Vol. 92, No. 1 (2013), pp. 249-273.
43. Nonna Mayer, “From Jean-Marie to Marine Le Pen: Electoral Change on the Far Right”, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 1 (2013), pp. 160-178. 46 Ibid.
44. James Shields, “Marine Le Pen and the ‘New’ FN: A Change of Style or of Substance?”, Parliamentary Affairs, Vol. 66, No. 1 (2013), pp. 179-196.
45. James Shields, “Departmental Elections and the Changing Landscape of French Politics”, Regional & Federal Studies, Vol. 26, No. 3 (2016), pp. 1-12.
46. Tournier‐Sol, “Reworking the Eurosceptic and Conservative Traditions into a Populist Narrative”, pp. 140-156.
47. Darren Kelsey, “Hero Mythology and Right-Wing Populism: A Discourse-Mythological Case Study of Nigel Farage in the Mail Online”, Journalism Studies, 25 March 2015, pp. 1-18.
48. David Runciman, “A Win for ‘Proper People’?: Brexit as a Rejection of the Networked World”, Juncture, Vol. 23, No. 1 (2016), pp. 4-7.
49. Alexandre Dézé, “Le changement dans la continuité: l’organisation partisane du Front national”, Pouvoirs, Vol. 2 (2016), pp. 49-62.
50. John Molyneux, “Editorial”, Irish Marxist Review, Vol. 4, No. 13 (2015), pp. 1-4.
51. Yannis Stavrakakis and Giorgos Katsambekis, “Left-wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA”, Journal of Political Ideologies, Vol. 19, No. 2 (2014), No. 119-142.
52. Paris Aslanidis and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, “Dealing with Populists in Government: The SYRIZA-ANEL Coalition in Greece”, Democratization, Vol. 23, No. 6 (2016), pp. 1-17.
53. Gerrasimos Moschonas, “A New Left in Greece: PASOK’s Fall and SYRIZA’s Rise”, Dissent, Vol. 60, No. 4 (2013), pp. 33-37.
54. Dimitri Sotiropoulos, “Southern European Governments and Public Bureaucracies in the Context of Economic Crisis”, European Journal of Social Security, Vol. 17, No. 2 (2015), pp. 227-245.
55. Marine Karanikolos, et al., “Financial Crisis, Austerity, and Health in Europe”, The Lancet, Vol. 381, No. 9874 (2013), pp. 1323-1331.
56. Marta Pérez Escolar, “Imperfect Bipartisanship and Spanish Pluralism: The Keys to Success of Podemos on Twitter”, (R)evolutionizing Political Communication through Social Media, Hershey, PA. Information Science Reference, 2016, p. 94.
57. Luis Ramiro and Raul Gomez, “Radical-Left Populism during the Great Recession: Podemos and Its Competition with the Established Radical Left”, Political Studies, 22 June 2016.