Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas

Volume: 21 Number: 2 July 1, 2016
  • Murat Ülgül
EN

Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas

Abstract

Are soldiers more prone and likely to use force and initiate conflicts than civilians? To bring a new insight to this question, this article compares the main arguments of military activism and military conservatism theories on Israeli policies during the First and Second Intifadas. Military activism argues that soldiers are prone to end political problems with the use of force mainly because of personal and organizational interests as well as the effects of a military-mindset. The proponents of military conservatism, on the other hand, claim that soldiers are conservative on the use of force and it is the civilians most likely offering military measures. Through an analysis of qualitative nature, the article finds that soldiers were more conservative in the use of force during the First Intifadas and Oslo Peace Process while they were more hawkish in the Second Intifada. This difference is explained by enemy conceptions and by the politicization of Israeli officers

Keywords

References

  1. Richard K. Betts, Soldiers, Statesmen, and Cold War Crises, Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1977; Samuel P. Huntington, The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations, Cambridge, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1985.
  2. Richard Ned Lebow, Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crises, Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1981. 4 Huntington
  3. Edward T. Imparato, General MacArthur: Wisdom and Visions, Paducah, Turner Pub. Co., 2000, p. 131. 6 Betts
  4. Sechser, “Are Soldiers Less War-Prone than Statesmen?”, p. 750.
  5. Jerel A. Rosati and James M. Scott, The Politics of United States Foreign Policy, Belmont, Thomson Wadsworth, 2007, pp. 154-155.
  6. Stephen Philip Cohen, The Idea of Pakistan, District of Columbia, Brookings Institution Press, 2004, p. 98.
  7. Huntington, The Soldier and the State, p. 61.
  8. Sechser, “Are Soldiers Less War-Prone than Statesmen?”, p. 750-751.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Murat Ülgül This is me

Publication Date

July 1, 2016

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2016 Volume: 21 Number: 2

APA
Ülgül, M. (2016). Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 21(2), 57-80. https://izlik.org/JA55SL73TH
AMA
1.Ülgül M. Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas. PERCEPTIONS. 2016;21(2):57-80. https://izlik.org/JA55SL73TH
Chicago
Ülgül, Murat. 2016. “Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 21 (2): 57-80. https://izlik.org/JA55SL73TH.
EndNote
Ülgül M (July 1, 2016) Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 21 2 57–80.
IEEE
[1]M. Ülgül, “Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas”, PERCEPTIONS, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 57–80, July 2016, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA55SL73TH
ISNAD
Ülgül, Murat. “Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 21/2 (July 1, 2016): 57-80. https://izlik.org/JA55SL73TH.
JAMA
1.Ülgül M. Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas. PERCEPTIONS. 2016;21:57–80.
MLA
Ülgül, Murat. “Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 21, no. 2, July 2016, pp. 57-80, https://izlik.org/JA55SL73TH.
Vancouver
1.Murat Ülgül. Soldiers and The Use of Force: Military Activism and Conservatism During The Intifadas. PERCEPTIONS [Internet]. 2016 Jul. 1;21(2):57-80. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA55SL73TH