Locating Turkey as a ‘Rising Power’ in the Changing International Order: An Introduction

Abstract

global governance” and “Turkey-as- a-middle power” have conspicuously been lacking in Turkish foreign policy literature and thus are in need of further elaboration, both conceptually and empirically. To partially fill this gap, this special issue also contains an article that seeks to locate Turkey in the current liberal global governance as a “rising middle power” occupying a middle ground between the traditional middle powers and the non-traditional or emerging middle powers. The said study then assesses Turkey’s preferences, capabilities and strategies in the changing network of global governance. A second article serves a similar purpose by providing an evaluation of Turkey’s global governance strategy in the context of its 2015 G20 Presidency

References

1. Richard Fontaine and Daniel M. Kliman, “The Global Swing States”, The Washington Quarterly
2. Vol. 36, No.1 (Winter 2013), pp. 93-109; Andrew F. Hart and Bruce D. Jones
3. “How Do Rising Powers Rise?”, Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, Vol. 52, No.6 (2010)
4. pp. 63-88; Matthew D. Stephen, “Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions
5. The Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa”, Global Society, Vol. 26
6. No.3 (2012), pp. 289-309; Breslin Shaun, “China’s Emerging Global Role: Dissatisfied
7. Responsible Great Power”, Politics, Vol. 30 (S1) (2010), pp. 52- 62, Michael Zürn and
8. Matthew Stephen, “The View of Old and New Powers on the Legitimacy of International

9. Institutions”, Politics, Vol. 30 (S1), (2010), pp. 91–101; Florini Ann, “Rising Asian Powers
10. and Changing Global Governance”, International Studies Review, Vol. 13, No. 1 (2011)
11. pp. 24- 33; Deborah Welch Larson and Alexei Shevchenko, “Status Seekers: Chinese and
12. Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy”, International Security, Vol. 34, No. 4 (Spring 2010)
13. pp. 63- 95; Miles Kahler, “Rising Powers and Global Governance: Negotiating Change in
14. a Resilient Status Quo”, International Affairs, Vol. 89, No. 3 (2013), pp. 711- 729; Sean
15. W. Burges, “Brazil as A Bridge between Old and New Powers?”, International Affairs, Vol.
16. No. 3 (2013), pp. 577- 594; Maximilian Terhalle, “Reciprocal Socialization: Rising Powers and the West”, International Studies Perspectives, Vol. 12, No. 4 (2011), pp. 341–361
17. Amrita Narlikar, “India Rising: Responsible to Whom?”, International Affairs, Vol. 89, No. 3
18. (2013), pp. 595–614; Amrita Narlikar, “Introduction Negotiating the Rise of New Powers”
19. International Affairs, Vol. 89, No. 3 (2013), pp.561–576; Stefan A Schirm, “Leaders in Need of Followers: Emerging Powers in Global Governance”, European Journal of International
20. Relations, Vol. 16, No.2 (2010), pp. 197-221; Suresh P Sing and Memory Dube, “BRICs and
21. the World Order: A Beginner’s Guide”, (2013), pp.1-46; Kevin Gray and Craig N. Murphy”
22. “Introduction: Rising Powers and the Future of Global Governance”, Third World Quarterly
23. Vol. 34, No. 2 (2013), pp.183-193; Gregory Chin and Fahimul Quadir, “Introduction
24. Rising States, Rising Donors and the Global Aid Regime”, Cambridge Review of International Affairs, Vol. 25, No. 4 (2012), pp. 493-506.
25. Andrew Hurrell, On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society, New York, Oxford University Press, 2007, p. 2. 3 Ibid.
26. Richard Shapcott, “International Ethics”, in John Baylis, Steve Smith & Patricia Owens (eds.), The Globalization of World Politics: An Introduction to International Relations, Fifth edi- tion, New York, Oxford University Press, 2011, p. 200.
27. Richard Falk, Balakrishnan Rajagopal and Jacqueline Stevens (eds.), “Introduction”, International Law and the Third World: Reshaping Justice, New York, Routledge-Cavendish, 2008, 1-7, p. 6.
28. Hassan Abu Ni’meh, “Consequences for Islamic Nations if International Law is Reshaped –How can Islamic Nations Best Utilize International Law”, Restarting the Dialogue in Inter- national Law, Documentation of the International Workshop held in Amman, 21-22 July 2003, p. 68.
29. İbrahim Karagül, “Gazze Ortak Utanç, İsrail bir Sapmadır” (Gaza, our common shame, Israel as deviation), Yeni Şafak, 21 July 2014.
30. Hart and Jones, “How Do Rising Powers Rise?”, p. 84. 9 Ibid., p. 69.
31. Tarık Oğuzlu and Emel Parlar Dal, “Decoding Turkey’s Rise: An Introduction”, Turkish Stud- ies, Vol.14, No.4 (December 2013), p. 618.
32. Andrew, Hurrell, “Brazil: What kind of a rising state in what kind of an Institutional Order”, in Allan S. Alexandroff and Andrew F. Cooper, (eds.), Rising States Rising Institutions: Chal- lenges for Global Governance, Brookings Inst. Press, 2010, pp. 3- 4.
33. Matthew D. Stephen “Rising Regional Powers and International Institutions: The Foreign Policy Orientations of India, Brazil and South Africa”, Global Society, Vol. 26, No. 3 (2012), p. 297.
34. Andrew Hurrell, “Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order: What Space for Would-be Great Powers?”, International Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 1 (2006), p. 10.
35. A. Cooper, and T. Fues, “Do the Asian Drivers Pull their Diplomatic Weight? China, India, and the United Nations”, World Development, Vol. 36, No. 2 (2008), pp. 293- 307.
36. Hurrell, “Hegemony, liberalism and Global Order”, p. 11.
37. Andrew Hurrell and Sandeep Sengupta, “Emerging powers, North–South Relations and Global Climate Politics”, International Affairs, Vol. 88, No. 3 (2012), p. 464.
38. Fontaine and Kliman, “International Order and Global Swing States”, p. 94.
39. Hurrell, “Hegemony, Liberalism and Global Order”, p. 11
40. Emel Parlar Dal, “Assessing Turkey’s ‘Normative’ Power in the Middle East and North Africa Region: New Dynamics and their Limitations”, Turkish Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4 (2013), p. 716.
41. Emel Parlar Dal, “A Normative Theory Approach to Contemporary Turkish Foreign Policy through the Cosmopolitanism-Communitarianism divide”, International Journal, Vol. 70, No. 3 (September 2015, forthcoming).
42. Ahmet Davutoğlu, “Global Governance”, SAM Vision Papers, No. 2 (March 2012).