The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession

Volume: 18 Number: 4 January 1, 2013
  • Evren Çelik Wıltse
EN

The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession

Abstract

Thus far, the G20 represents the most significant collective attempt to address the 2008 economic crisis by the world’s largest economies. It is the only global platform that could serve as an institutional panacea for the protracted economic slowdown that has been experienced since 2008. This article analyses the G20 by situating it in the general historical-institutional context of the global economic governance. It compares and contrasts the G20 with the Bretton Woods institutions. Subsequently, some of the most pronounced criticisms of G20 are addressed, including concerns about possible “agenda creep” and the lack of a hegemonic underwriter.

Keywords

References

  1. An earlier version of this article was published as a Policy Brief for the Ankara Center for Political and Economic Research, and presented at a panel on the G20 at the TOBB University of Economy and Technology. The author would like to thank Dr. M. Akif Kireçci of ASEM, and panelist Mr. Turalay Kenç, Deputy Governor of the Central Bank of Turkey, for their valuable comments.
  2. C. Lapavistas, A. Kaltenbrunner, et.al., “Breaking Up? A Route Out of the Eurozone Crisis”, Research on Money and Finance Occasional Report, No. 3 (November 2011).
  3. Gabriel Goodliffe and Stephan Sberro, “The G20 after Los Cabos: Illusion of Global Economic Governance”, The International Spectator, Vol. 47, No. 4 (December 2012), p. 15.
  4. “Cynicism and Expectations of the G-20”, The Stanley Foundation Monthly Newsletter, December 2011.
  5. John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 2001, pp. 186-191.
  6. Barry Eichengreen, “Hegemonic Stability Theories of International Monetary System”, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 2193, Cambridge, MA, 1987.
  7. Robert Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1984.
  8. Douglass North, Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Evren Çelik Wıltse This is me

Publication Date

January 1, 2013

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2013 Volume: 18 Number: 4

APA
Wıltse, E. Ç. (2013). The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 18(4), 7-28. https://izlik.org/JA23WX23JA
AMA
1.Wıltse EÇ. The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession. PERCEPTIONS. 2013;18(4):7-28. https://izlik.org/JA23WX23JA
Chicago
Wıltse, Evren Çelik. 2013. “The G20 and Global Economic Governance During a Protracted Recession”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 18 (4): 7-28. https://izlik.org/JA23WX23JA.
EndNote
Wıltse EÇ (January 1, 2013) The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 18 4 7–28.
IEEE
[1]E. Ç. Wıltse, “The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession”, PERCEPTIONS, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 7–28, Jan. 2013, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA23WX23JA
ISNAD
Wıltse, Evren Çelik. “The G20 and Global Economic Governance During a Protracted Recession”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 18/4 (January 1, 2013): 7-28. https://izlik.org/JA23WX23JA.
JAMA
1.Wıltse EÇ. The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession. PERCEPTIONS. 2013;18:7–28.
MLA
Wıltse, Evren Çelik. “The G20 and Global Economic Governance During a Protracted Recession”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 18, no. 4, Jan. 2013, pp. 7-28, https://izlik.org/JA23WX23JA.
Vancouver
1.Evren Çelik Wıltse. The G20 and Global Economic Governance during a Protracted Recession. PERCEPTIONS [Internet]. 2013 Jan. 1;18(4):7-28. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA23WX23JA