Multiculturalism: The Culturalisation of What is Social and Political

Abstract

This paper is critically engaged in the elaboration of the ideology of multiculturalism in the European context, which is currently constrained by the securitisation and stigmatisation of migration and Islam. In western nation-states migration has recently been framed as a source of fear and instability in a way that constructs ‘communities of fear’. This article claims that both securitisation and Islamophobia have recently been employed by the neo-liberal states as a form of governmentality in order to control the masses in ethno-culturally and religiously diverse societies at the expense of deepening the already existing cleavages between majority societies and minorities with Muslim background. The article will also discuss the other side of the coin by referring to the revitalisation of the rhetoric of tolerance and multiculturalism by the Justice and Development Party rule in Turkey, the origins of which date back to Ottoman times

Keywords

• Migration, multiculturalism, tolerance, integration, Islamophobia, Muslims, governmentality, securitisation, stigmatisation, JDP.

References

1. Franz Fanon, The Wretched of the Earth, New York, Grove, 1965. 2 Will Kymlicka, “The Rise and Fall of Multiculturalism?: New Debates on Inclusion and Accommodation in Diverse Societies”, in Steven Vertovec and Susanne Wessendorf (eds.), The Multiculturalism Backlash: European Discourses, Policies and Practices, London, Routledge, 2010, pp. 32-49.
2. NRC Handelsblad, “Het Multiculturele Drama”, at http://retro.nrc.nl/W2/Lab/ Multicultureel/scheffer.html [last visited 21 August 2013]. 7 Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilisations and the Remaking of the World Order, New York, Simon and Schuster, 1996. 8 Wilhelm Heitmeyer, Joachim Müller and Helmur Schröder, Verlockender Fundamentalismus (Enticing Multiculturalism), Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1997. 9 Thilo Sarrazin, Deutschland schafft sich ab: Wie wir unser Land aufs Spiel setzen, Munich, DVA Verlag, 2010.
3. Steven Vertovec and Susanne Wessendorf, “Introduction: Assessing the Backlash Against Multiculturalism in Europe”, in Vertovec and Wessendorf (eds.), The Multiculturalism Backlash, p. 1. 11 Sarrazin
4. “Leadership and Leitkultur”, New York Times, at http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/29/ opinion/29Habermas.html [last visited 20 April 2013].
5. “Spiegel Interview with Geert Wilders: ‘Merkel Is Afraid’”, Der Spiegel, at http:// www.spiegel.de/international/europe/spiegel-interview-with-geert-wilders-merkel-is- afraid-a-727978.html [last visited 26 August 2013].
6. Slavoj Žižek, The Universal Exception, New York, Continuum, 2006, p. 171.
7. Concerning the ways in which Muslim-origin individuals in and around Europe perceive the west in a holistic and occidentalist manner see, Ian Buruma and Avishai Margalit, Occidentalism: A Short History of Anti-Westernism, London, Atlantic Books, 2004.
8. Roxanne L. Doty, “Immigration and the Politics of Security”, Security Studies, Vol. 8, No. 2-3 (2000), p. 73.

9. Michael Collyer, “Migrants, Migration and the Security Paradigm: Constraints and Opportunities”, Mediterranean Politics, Vol. 11, No. 2 (July 2006), p. 267.
10. Jef Huysmans, The Politics of Insecurity, London, Routledge, 2006.
11. David Campbell, Writing Security: United States Foreign Policy and the Politics of Identity, Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, 1992, p. 195.
12. See, inter alia, James Clifford, Routes: Travel and Translation in the Late Twentieth Century, Cambridge, Harvard UP, 1997; Zygmunt Bauman, Community: Seeking Safety in an Insecure World, Cambridge, Polity, 2001.
13. William Walters, “Security, Territory, Metagovernance: Critical Notes on Anti-illegal Immigration Programmes in the European Union”, paper presented at Istanbul Bilgi University, (7 December 2006).
14. Michel Foucault describes the concept of governmentality as a collection of methods used by political power to maintain its power, or as an art of acquiring power. See, Michel Foucault, “Governmentality”, Ideology and Consciousness, Vol. 6 (Summer 1979), pp. 5-21.
15. “To Reassure and Protect after September 11th”, Social Science Research Council, at http:// www.ssrc.org/sept11/essays/bigo.htm [last visited 21 March 2013].
16. Roxanne L. Doty, “Racism, Desire, and the Politics of Immigration”, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 28, No.3 (1999), pp. 585-606.
17. Ibid. p. 587. The notion of new racism was first used by Martin Barker to refer to the changing nature of racism, the object of which has become culture and religion rather than colour and biological differences. See, Martin Barker, The New Racism, London, Junction Books, 1981.
18. For a detailed account of the ways in which the area of “Freedom, Security and Justice” has been created by the European Union, see, Alessandra Buonfino, “Between Unity and Plurality: The Politicization and Securitization of the Discourse of Immigration in Europe”, New Political Science, Vol. 26, No. 1 (March 2004), pp. 23-49.
19. Walters, “Security, Territory, Metagovernance”.
20. Slavoj Zizek, “For A Leftist Appropriation of the European Legacy”, Journal of Political Ideologies, Vol. 3, No. 1 (February 1998), pp. 63-78.
21. Jeffrey R. Collins, “Redeeming the Enlightenment: New Histories of Religious Toleration”, The Journal of Modern History Vol. 81, No. 3 (September 2009), pp. 607-636.
22. Robert Ian Moore, The Formation of a Persecuting Society: Power and Deviance in Western Europe, 950-1250, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1987.
23. Wilbur K. Jordan, The Development of Religious Toleration in England, London, George Allen and Unwin Ltd., 1936.
24. Wendy Brown, Regulating Aversion: Tolerance in the Age of Identity and Empire, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2006.
25. Michael Walzer, On Toleration, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1997.
26. Reiner Forst, Toleranz im Konflikt: Geschichte, Gehalt und Gegenwart eines umstrittenen Begriffs, Frankfurt/Main, Suhrkamp, 2003, pp. 42-48. 40 Forst
27. Andrew J. Cohen, “What Toleration Is”, Ethics, Vol. 115, No. 1 (October 2004), p. 69. 42 Ibid., p.77.
28. Charles Taylor, Multiculturalism, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 1994.
29. Jürgen Habermas, The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, Cambridge, MIT Press, 1998.
30. Elisabetta Galeotti, Toleration as Recognition, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 193-194.
31. Tariq Modood, Multiculturalism: A Civic Idea, Cambridge, Polity, 2007. 47 Galeotti, 48 Habermas
32. Ibid., pp. 228-232. 50 Ibid. 51 Brown, 52 Ibid., p. 29.
33. Richard W. Bulliet, The Case for Islamo-Christian Civilisation, New York, Columbia University Press, 2004, p. 12.
34. For a detailed account of the ways in which the “clash of civilisations” paradigm was revitalised in the aftermath of 11 September, see, Matthew Sussex, “Cultures in Conflict? Re-evaluating the ‘Clash of Civilisations’ Thesis After 9/11”, in P. Sherman and M. Sussex (eds.), European Security After 9/11, Aldershot, Ashgate, 2004, pp. 28-50.
35. “Berlusconi breaks ranks over Islam”, Guardian, at http://www.theguardian.com/ world/2001/sep/27/afghanistan.terrorism7 [last visited 26 August 2013].
36. Talal Asad, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity, Stanford, CA, Stanford University Press, 2003, p. 7.
37. “President Delivers State of the Union Address”, George W. Bush Administration White House, at http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2002/01/ 20020129-11.html [last visited 26 August 2013].
38. Cited in Gabriele Marranci, “Multiculturalism, Islam and the Clash of Civilisations Theory: Rethinking Islamophobia”, Culture and Religion, Vol. 5, No. 1 (March 2004), p. 108.
39. Pim Fortuyn, De islamisering van onze cultuur, Uitharn, Karakter Uitgeners, 2001.
40. Chris Allen, Islamophobia, London, Ashgate, 2010, p.215.
41. See, Doty, “Immigration and the Politics of Security”; Huysmans, The Politics of Insecurity; Kaya, Islam, Migration and Integration; Allen, Islamophobia.
42. Ayhan Kaya, Europeanization and Tolerance in Turkey: The Myth of Toleration, London, Palgrave, 2013.
43. For further information on the Initiative, see, “Many Cultures, One Humanity”, United Nations Alliance of Civilizations, at http://www.unaoc.org/ [last visited 30 April 2013].
44. José Casanova, “The Long, Difficult, and Tortuous Journey of Turkey into Europe and the Dilemmas of European Civilization”, Constellations, Vol. 13, No. 2 (June 2006), pp. 234- 247.
45. William Hale and Ergun Özbudun, Islamism, Democracy and Liberalism in Turkey: the Rise of the AKP, London, Routledge, 2009, pp. 7-8.
46. MEB (The Ministry of National Education), “İlk Ders 2010/53 Genelge (07/12/2011- 82202 Sayılı Makam Onayı ile Yürürlülükten Kaldırılmıştır)”, at http://www. egitimmevzuat.com/index.php/201009091422/2010/lk-ders-201053-genelge.html [last visited 26 August 2013]. . 68 Kaya
47. Şerif Mardin, “Religion and Secularism in Turkey”, in Ali Kazancıgil and Ergun Özbudun (eds.), Atatürk: Founder of a Modern State, London, C. Hurst & Company, 1981, p. 192.
48. Ibid., p. 196; Erick Zürcher, Turkey: A Modern History, London, I.B. Tauris, 2003, p. 66.
49. Karen Barkey, Empire of Difference: The Ottomans in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
50. Mardin, “Religion and Secularism in Turkey”.
51. Tarık Zafer Tunaya, Türkiye’nin Siyasi Hayatında Batılılaşma Hareketleri, Istanbul, Yedigün Matbaası, 1960, p. 34.
52. Robert F. Spencer, “Cultural Process and Intellectual Current: Durkheim and Atatürk”, American Anthropologist, Vol. 60, No. 4 (August 1958), p. 643.
53. Schmuel N. Eisenstadt, “The Kemalist Revolution in Comparative Perspective”, in Kazancıgil and Özbudun (eds.), Atatürk: Founder of a Modern State, p. 132.
54. Schmuel N. Eisenstadt, “The Public Sphere in Muslim Societies”, in Nilüfer Göle and Ludwig Amman (eds.), Islam in Public: Turkey, Iran, and Europe, Vol. 3, Istanbul, Istanbul Bilgi University Press, 2006, pp. 447- 449. Eisenstadt also differentiates the ulema of the Ottoman Empire from the other Muslim societies, and states that while the Ottoman ulema was a highly autonomous community of religious elites, it was partly organised by the state.
55. Mardin, “Religion and Secularism in Turkey”, p. 194.
56. Eisenstadt, “The Public Sphere in Muslim Societies”, p. 452.
57. Andrew J. Cohen defines what toleration is not: Toleration is not indifference, not moral stoicism, not pluralism, not non-interference, not permissiveness, not neutrality and not tolerance. Toleration is the activity of enduring, while tolerance is the virtue (attitude) itself. See, Cohen, “What Toleration Is”, p. 77. Though agreeing with Cohen on the difference between toleration and tolerance, I use these terms interchangeably for the sake of simplicity.
58. Ali Çarkoğlu ve Binnaz Toprak, Değişen Türkiye’de Din, Toplum ve Siyaset, Istanbul, TESEV, 2007. 81 Barkey
59. Foucault, “Governmentality”, p. 5-21. 83 Walzer, On Toleration; Robert M. Hayden, “Antagonistic Tolerance: Competitive Sharing of Religious Sites in South Asia and the Balkans”, Current Anthropology, Vol. 43, No. 2
60. (April 2002), pp. 205-231; Brown, Regulating Aversion. Europeanization and Tolerance in Turkey. 84 Kaya