Power Shifts in East Asia: Balance of Power vs. Liberal Institutionalism

Abstract

With the rise of China, the East Asian regional order, so long dominated by the U.S. presence and by Japan, is undergoing major power shifts. Increasingly, China is becoming aggressive over its maritime territorial claims in the East China and South China seas. ChinaJapan relations are antagonistic and tensions are on the rise. As a result, Japan, along with South Korea and Vietnam, is not only seeking increased security guarantees from the U.S., but also seeking to establish defence partnerships with India to maintain the balance vis-à-vis Chinese assertiveness. This article offers an explanation of these power shifts in East Asia in particular and Asia in general by interpreting empirical data from the perspectives of two contending international relations theories: realism and liberal institutionalism. From a purely realist perspective, China will become even more aggressive in East Asia. Consequently, it is critical to form a countervailing alliance against its rising power. Meanwhile, liberal institutionalism argues that the international order is flexible and that international institutions and major powers

Keywords

• East Asia, China, Japan, India, Power, Realism, Liberalism, Conflict, Cooperation.

References

1. National Intelligence Council, Global Trends 2030 Alternative Worlds, Washington D.C, December 2012, p. iv.
2. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), Background paper on SIPRI Military Expenditure Data 2011, 17 April 2012, p. 5.
3. See, “China National Defense in 2010”, Information Office of the State Council, The People’s Republic of China, at http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2011- 03/31/c_13806851.htm [last visited 12 December 2012]. 4 Ibid.
4. See, “White Papers of the Government”, at http://www.china.org.cn/e-white/index.htm [last visited 3 November 2012]. 6 Ibid.
5. Jane Perlez, “China Steps up Pressures on Japan in Islands Disputes”, The New York Times, 15 December 2012.
6. “Japan Buys Disputed Islands, China Sends Patrol Ships”, Reuters, at http://www.reuters. com/article/2012/09/11/us-japan-china-idUSBRE88A0GY20120911 [last visited 19 December 2012]. 9 Ibid.
7. “East Asia Sea Tensions: China Conducts Naval Exercises”, BBC, at http://www.bbc.co.uk/ news/world-asia-china-19997928 [last visited 2 December 2012].
8. “Chinese Passport Map Causes Diplomatic Dispute”, The Guardian, 27 November 2012.

9. Linus Hagstorm and Bjorn Jerden, “Senkakus a Harbinger for Japanese Shift on China Policy?”, East Asia Forum, at http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2012/10/10/senkakus-a- harbinger-for-japanese-shift-on-china-policy/ [last visited 18 December 2012].
10. Michael Lipin, “Nationalism fuels Japan-China Island Dispute”, Voice of America, at http:// www.voanews.com/content/japan-china-island-dispute-rooted-in-domestic-challenges- nationalist-grievances/1493779.html [last visited 17 December 2012].
11. Christopher Lyane, “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers will Rise”, International Security, Vol. 17, No.4 (Spring 1993), pp. 5-51; Christopher Lyane, “The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States’ Unipolar Moment’”, International Security, Vol. 31, No.2 (Fall 2006), pp.7-41. Also see, Bernd Debusman, “A Final Goodbye to Super- Power America?”, Reuters, at http://blogs.reuters.com/bernddebusmann/2011/03/11/a- final-goodbye-to-superpower-america/ [last visited 21 December 2012]; “No More Superpower?”, The New York Times, 24 June 2011.
12. Quansheng Zhao, “Managed Great Power Relations: Do We See “One Up and One Down”’, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 30, No.4 and 5 (August-October 2007), pp. 609-637.
13. Joseph S. Nye, “The Decline and Fall of America’s Decline and Fall”, Project Syndicate, at http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/the-decline-and-fall-of-america-s-decline- and-fall [last visited 21 December 2012].
14. National Intelligence Council, Global Trends 2030, p. x.
15. U.S. Department of Defense, “Sustaining U.S. Global Leadership: Priorities for 21st Century Defence”, at http://www.defense.gov/news/defense_strategic_guidance.pdf [last visited 13 December 2012].
16. National Intelligence Council, Global Trends 2025: A Transformed World, Washington D.C, November 2008, p. vi.
17. Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics, U.S., Addison Wesley, 1979.
18. John Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics, New York, Norton, 2001. 22 Ibid, p. 2.
19. Ibid, pp. 386 and 401; also see, Stephen M. Walt, Taming American Power The Global Resposne to U.S. Primacy, New York, W.W. Norton, 2005.
20. John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 2001; also see, Andrew Moravcsik, “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics”, International Organizations, Vol. 51, No.4 (Autumn 1997), pp. 513-552.
21. Robert O. Keohane and Joseph Nye Jr., Power and Interdependence, Boston, Little, Brown, 1997.
22. Kenneth Waltz, “Structural Realism after the Cold War”, International Security, Vol. 25, No. 1 (Summer 2000), pp. 5-41.
23. See, Brian C. Rathbun, “Uncertain about Uncertainty: Understanding the Multiple Meanings of a Crucial Concept in International Relations Theory”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 3 (September 2007), pp. 533-57.
24. Waltz, “Structural Realism after the Cold War”, pp. 5-8. 29 Ibid, p. 7.
25. Keohane and Nye, Power and Interdependence.
26. Waltz, “Structural Realism after the Cold War”, p. 32.
27. See, Aaron L. Friedberg, “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multi-Polar Asia”, International Security, Vol. 18, No.3 (Winter 1993/94), pp.5-32.
28. Kishore Mahububani, “The Pacific Impulse”, Survival, Vol. 37, No.1 (Spring 1995).
29. Waltz, Theory of International Politics, p. 20
30. National Intelligence Council, Global Trends 2025, p. iv.
31. Robert Gilpin, War and Change in the International System, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1981.
32. John Ikenberry, “The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive?”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 87, No.1 (January-February 2008).
33. Roderick MacFarquhar, “Mission to Mao”, at http://www.nybooks.com/articles/20343 [last visited 6 December 2012]. 39 Ibid.
34. See, Daniel W. Drezner, “The New New World Order”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 86, No.2 (March-April 2007).
35. Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers, New York, Vintage, 1987.
36. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics.
37. Devika Banerji and Rishi Shah, “India Obvertakes Japan to Become Third Largest Economy in Purchasing Power Parity”, The Economic Times, at http://articles.economictimes. indiatimes.com/2012-04-19/news/31367838_1_ppp-terms-india-s-gdp-power-parity [last visited 21 December 2012]; see also, Gurcharan Das, “The Indian Model”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 4 (July-August 2006).
38. See, C. Raja Mohan, “India and the Balance of Power”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85, No. 4 (July- August 2006).
39. Surjit Mansingh, “Rising China and Emergent India in the 21st Century: Friends or Rivals?”, The Korean Journal of Defence Analysis, Vol. 19, No.4 (Winter, 2007), pp. 117-142.
40. See, David Shambaugh, “China Military Modernization: Making Steady and Surprising Progress”, in Ashley Tellis and Michael Wills (eds.), Military Modernization in an Era, Seattle, The National Bureau of Asian Research, 2005; see also, Namrata Goswami, “China’s Territorial Claim on Arunachal Pradesh: Alternative Scenarios 2032”, IDSA Occasional Paper- No. 29, November 2012, pp. 1-47.
41. See, “India-U.S. Statement of 18 July 2005”, at http://www.indianembassy.org/press_ release/2005/July/21.htm [last visited 4 December 2012].
42. Bharat Karnad (ed.), Future Imperiled: India’s Security in the 1990s and Beyond, New Delhi, Viking, 1990; see also, Brahma Chellany (ed.), Securing India’s Future in the New Millennium, New Delhi, Orient Longman and Centre for Policy Research, 1999.
43. Bharat Karnad, Nuclear Weapons and Indian Security: The Realist Foundations of Strategy, New Delhi, Macmillan, 2002, pp. 557-612.
44. “China Warship Warns Indian Navy Vessel in South China Sea”, The Economic Times, 1 September 2011.
45. “India, Vietnam Join Hands for Oil Exploration in China Sea”, The Hindu Business Line, 12 October 2011.
46. “Vietnam General Staff Delegation Visits India”, Tuoitre News, 4 December 2011.
47. K. V. Prasad, “India, Japan to Step up Defence Cooperation”, The Hindu, 3 November 2011.
48. “Maritime Security Issues Dominate India-Japan Defence Talks, India and Japan to Step Up Bilateral Military Exercises, India-Japan Defence Cooperation ‘Geared’ Towards Peace and Prosperity –Antony”, Press Information Bureau, Government of India, at http://pib.nic. in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=76976 [last visited 14 December 2012]; see also, Sandeep Dikshit, “India, Japan to Hold Second 2+2 Dialogue on Monday”, The Hindu, 18 October 2012.
49. Josh Rogin, “Inside the First Ever U.S.-Japan-India Trilateral Meeting”, Foreign Policy, at http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2011/12/23/inside_the_first_ever_us_japan_ india_trilateral_meeting [Last visited 21 December 2012].
50. Rajeev Sharma, “A. K. Antony’s Seoul Mission”, The Diplomat, at http://thediplomat.com/ indian-decade/2010/09/01/a-k-antonys-seoul-mission/ [last visited 12 December 2012].
51. “India-Australia Discuss Military Ties”, ABC News, at http://www.abc.net.au/news/2011- 12-08/india-and-australia-discuss-military-ties/3719190 [last visited 21 December 2012].
52. See, Alastair Iain Johnson, “Is China a Status Quo Power?”, International Security, Vol. 27, No. 4 (Spring 2003), pp. 5-56; Avery Goldstein, “Power Transitions, Institutions, and China’s Rise in East Asia: Theoretical Expectations and Evidence”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4 and 5 (August-October 2007), pp. 639-682.
53. Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers.
54. Parag Khanna, “Waving Goodbye to Hegemony”, The New York Times Magazine, 27 January 2008.
55. Zhao, “Managed Great Power Relations”, p. 613.
56. The World Bank, “GDP Per Capita (Current US $)”, at http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/ NY.GDP.PCAP.CD [last visited 7 December 2012].
57. “Background paper on SIPRI Military Expenditure Data 2011”, p. 5.
58. Zhao, “Managed Great Power Relations”, pp. 615-616.
59. Samuel P. Hungtington, The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century, Norman and London, University of Oklahoma Press, 1991.
60. Richard Rosecrance, The Rise of the Trading State: Commerce and Conquest in the Modern World, New York, Basic Books, 1986.
61. See, Warren I. Cohen, “China’s Rise in Historical Perspective”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4 (August-October 2007), pp. 683-704.
62. David Shambaugh, “China Engages Asia Reshaping the Regional World Order”, International Security, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Winter, 2004-2005), pp, 64-99.
63. Kanti P. Bajpai, “Pakistan and China in Indian Strategic Thought”, International Journal, Vol. 62, No. 4 (Autumn 2007), pp. 805-22.
64. “India-China Trade Expected to Touch $ 100 billion by 2015”, The Economic Times, 26 October 2012.
65. “India, ASEAN Finalise on FTA in Services and Investments”, The Hindu, 21 December 2012.
66. Benjamin O. Fordham, “Billiard Balls or Snowflakes? Major Power Prestige and the International Diffusion of Institutions and Practices”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 51, No. 1 (March 2007), pp. 31-52.
67. Drezner, “The New New World Order”.
68. Quansheng Zhao, “The Shift in Power Distribution and the Change of Major Power Relations”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 24, No. 4 (2001), pp. 49-78.
69. The World Bank, “GDP Per Capita (Current US $)”.
70. More on this line of argument, see, Andrew J. Nathan and Robert S. Ross, The Great Wall and the Empty Fortress: China’s Search for Security, New York, Norton, 1997.
71. Mearsheimer, Tragedy of Great Power Politics, pp. 45, 140-1 and 402; Glenn H. Snyder, Alliance Politics, New York, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1997.
72. Mike M. Mochizuki, “Japan’s Shifting Strategy toward the Rise of China”, The Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 30, No. 4- 5 (2007), pp. 739-776.
73. Khanna, “Waving Goodbye to Hegemony”.
74. Isaiah Berlin, “On Political Judgment”, The New York Review of Books, Vol. 43, No. 15 (3 October 1996).
75. Aaron L. Friedberg, “Europe’s Past, Asia’s Future?”, SAIS Policy Paper, October 1998, pp. 1-19.
76. See, Robert Jarvis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics, New Jersey, Princeton University Press, 1976.