Security Conditions and Regional Competition in East Asia after the New Millennium: A South Korean Perspective

Abstract

Even after the new millennium, the Korean peninsula still remains not only the heart of the Northeast Asian security discourse, but also as the centre of global security concerns. The absence of visionary leadership in East Asia and North Korea’s self-destructive survival strategy make it difficult to achieve peace on the Korean peninsula. Looking back at the last two decades of globalisation, the South Korean people have been embarrassed by the fact that although the country has been extending its reach as a meaningful global player economically, it has been struggling to contend with security issues such as the North Korean nuclear problem, revision of the South Korean-US alliance, Japanese militarisation, the rise of China, and so on. Thus, there continues to be many security concerns remaining for South Korea also known as the Republic of Korea, or ROK in the new millennium

Keywords

• South Korean foreign policy, Inter-Korean Relations, Northeast Asia

References

1. Arron Friedberg, “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospect for Peace in a Multipolar Asia”, International Security, Vol. 18, No. 3 (Winter 1993), p. 9.
2. Kent Calder, “U.S. Foreign Policy in Northeast Asia”, in Samuel S. Kim (ed.), The International Relations of Northeast Asia, Lanham,Rowman & Littlefield, 2004; David Kang, “Between Balancing and Bandwagoning: South Korea’s Response to China”, Journal of East Asian Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1 (2009), pp. 1-28; Lowell Dittmer, “The Emerging Northeast Asian Regional Order”, in Samuel S. Kim (ed.), The International Relations of Northeast Asia.
3. Takashi Terada, “Forming an East Asian Community: A Site for Japan-China Power Struggles”, Japanese Studies, Vol. 26, No. 1 (May 2006).
4. Ihn-hwi Park, “Changing U.S. Alliance Strategy and the Limits of the Bilateral Alliance Structure in Northeast Asia”, Journal of East Asian Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 1 (Spring-Sumer 2007), p. 59. 5 Ibid.
5. Ihn-hwi Park, “Dongbuka Kukje-Kwankewa Hankukeui Kukga-Iik (Northeast Asian International Relations and Korea’s National Interest)”, Kukgajeonryak (National Strategy), Vol. 11, No. 3 (2005), p. 15.
6. Robert M. Gates, “A Balance Strategy”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 88, No. 1 (January/February 2009).
7. Sang-Hyun Lee and Baek Jong-Chun (eds.), Korea-U.S. Relations in Transition: Korea-U.S. Alliance in Retrospect and Prospects for a New Strategic Partnership, Seongnam- Korea, Sejong Institute, 2002. 9 Ibid.
8. Christopher Hemmer and Peter Katzenstein, “Why is There No NATO in Asia? Collective Identity, Regionalism and the Origins of Multilateralism”, International Organization, Vol. 56, No. 3 (June 2002), p. 579.

9. Peter Van Ness, “The North Korean Nuclear Crisis: Four-Plus-Two- An Idea Whose Time has Come”, Asian Perspective, Vol. 27, No. 4 ( 2003), p. 255.
10. Charles M. Perry and James Schoff, “Building Six-Party Capacity for a WMD-Free Korea”, The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, Vol. 16, No. 2 (2004), p.17.
11. Chinese Foreign Ministry Statement, “Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing Meets Heads of Delegations to the Six-Party Talks”, at http://muchina-embassy.org/eng/xwdt/t152453.htm [last visited 22 November 2012].
12. APEC (Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation), ASEM (Asia-Europe Meeting).
13. Kevin Cai, “Is a Free Trade Zone Emerging in Northeast Asia in the Wake of the Asian Financial Crisis?”, Pacific Affairs, Vol.74, No.1 (Spring 2001), pp. 7-24.
14. Hemmer and Katzenstein, “Why Is There No NATO in Asia?”.
15. Joshua Kurlantzick, Charm Offensive: How China’s Soft Power is Transforming the World, New Haven- CT, Yale University Press, 2007, p.33.
16. Jianwei Wang, “China’s Multilateral Diplomacy in the New Millennium”, in Yong Deng and Fei-Ling Wang (eds.), China Rising: Power and Motivation in Chinese Foreign Policy, Lanham, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2005, p. 169.
17. Bijan Zheng, “China’s Peaceful Rise to the Great Power Status”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 84, No. 5 (September/ October 2005).
18. Wang, “China’s Multilateral Diplomacy in the New Millennium”, p. 172.
19. Kurlantzick, Charm Offensive, p. 39.
20. Zheng, “China’s Peaceful Rise to the Great Power Status”.
21. Randall L. Schweller, “Managing the Rise of Great Powers”, in Alastair I. Johnston and Robert S. Ross (eds.), Engaging China: The Management of an Emerging Power, New York, Routledge, 1999, p. 14.
22. Kurlantzick, Charm Offensive, p. 98.
23. David Shambaugh, “China Engages Asia: Reshaping the Regional Order”, International Security, Vol. 29, No. 3 (Winter 2004/2005), pp. 64-99.
24. Kurlantzick, Charm Offensive, p.109 28 Ibid.
25. Takashi Shiraishi, “The third wave: Southeast Asia and Middle Class Formation in the Making of A Region”, in Peter J. Katzenstein and Takashi Shiraishi (eds.), Beyond Japan: The dynamics of East Asian Regionalism, Ithaca- NY, Cornell University Press, 2006, p. 242.
26. Hidetaka Yoshimatsu, The Political Economy of Regionalism in East Asia, Basingstoke-UK, Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
27. Gilbert Rozman, “South Korea and Sino-Japanese Rivalry: A Middle Power’s Options Within the East Asian Core Triangle”, The Pacific Review, Vol. 20, No. 2 (June 2007), p. 209.
28. Takio Yamada, “Toward a Principled Integration of East Asia: Concept of an East Asian Community”, Gaiko Forum, Fall 2005.
29. Katzenstein and Shiraishi (eds.), Beyond Japan, p. 16.
30. Rozman, “South Korea and Sino-Japanese Rivalry”, p. 209.
31. Japanese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, at http://www.mofa.go.jp/mofaj/gaiko/free_pros/pdfs/ shiryo_01.pdf [last visited 15 January 2013]. 36 Ibid.
32. Rozman, “South Korea and Sino-Japanese Rivalry”, p. 209.
33. Terada, “Forming an East Asian Community”, p.16.
34. Seong- Ho Ahn, “Initiating Municipal International Cooperation Towards A Sustainable East Asia Community”, in Seong- Ho Ahn & Byeong-II Rho (eds.), East Asian Cooperation in the Global Era, Seoul- Korea, Daunsaem Press, 2006, p.25.
35. Hee Ok Lee, “A Critical Interpretation about Political Disputes of the Research Project of North Eastern China”, East Asian Studies, Vol. 53 (2007), p.19. 41 Ibid.
36. Rozman, “South Korea and Sino-Japanese Rivalry”, p. 210.
37. Sang-Hyun Lee, “National Security Strategy of the Lee Myung-Bak Government: The Vision of ‘Global Korea’ and Its Challenges”, The Korean Journal of Security Affairs, 2009, p.18.
38. Eduard Jordan, “The Concept of a Middle Power in International Relations: Distinguishing between Emerging and Traditional Middle Powers”, Politickon, Vol. 30, No. 2 (2003), p. 102.
39. Rozman, “South Korea and Sino-Japanese Rivalry”, p. 208.
40. Youngmin Kwon, Regional Community-Building in East Asia, Seoul, Yonsei University Press, 2002.
41. John S. Duffield, “Why is There No APTO? Why is There No OSCAP?: Asia-Pacific Security Institutions in Comparative Perspective”, Contemporary Security Policy, Vol. 22, No. 2 (2001), p.23.