Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism

Volume: 16 Number: 3 October 1, 2011
  • Hasan Kösebalaban
EN

Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism

Abstract

It is sometimes argued that Turkish foreign policy under the AK Party government reflects its ideology, and Turkish foreign policy towards the Middle East is often used as an illustration of this influence. When it is closely examined, however, one can easily see that the government has often followed a mainly realist foreign policy approach in the Middle East and used the idealism for the maximization of Turkish national interests. In contrast to the power resources at the disposal of other regional powers, including the support of external powers, sectarian identities, or ethnic-linguistic ties, the key asset of Turkish foreign policy is its successful combination of democracy and Islam. Utilizing this image, Turkey has emerged as the most outspoken supporter of democratic transformations, aiming to create a liberaldemocratic regional order. This, however, brings Turkey ultimately into conflict with other aspiring hegemonic powers, including both Israel and Iran

Keywords

References

  1. Graham E. Fuller, New Turkish Republic: Turkey As a Pivotal State in the Muslim World, Washington, DC, United States Institute of Peace Press, 2008, p.72.
  2. Osmanisches Comeback”, Der Spiegel, 30 May 2009. Also see Der Spiegel interview with Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu, “Wir Wollen Ordnung”, Der Spiegel, 22 June 2009.
  3. “Turkish Leader Stresses Strong Ties with Israel in Meeting with U.S. Jews”, at http://www. theturkishtimes.com/archive/03/0103/f_ties.html [Last visited 12 February 2006]. 4 DEIK
  4. “Bush: Sharon A ‘Man Of Peace’”, Washington Post, 19 April 2002.
  5. Şahin Alpay, “The Complexities of Turkey’s Relationship with Israel”, Today’s Zaman, 5 January 2009.
  6. “Rice Praises Turkey’s ‘Very Helpful’ Efforts to End Gaza Crisis”, Haaretz, 6 July 2006.
  7. Ambassador Ross Wilson Interview with Kanal 7, at http://turkey.usembassy.gov/amb_022806.html [Last visited 29 July 2009].
  8. David Bedein, “Hamas Looks to Offset Dependency on Iran”, The Philadelphia Bulletin, 7 May 2009.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Hasan Kösebalaban This is me

Publication Date

October 1, 2011

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2011 Volume: 16 Number: 3

APA
Kösebalaban, H. (2011). Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 16(3), 93-114. https://izlik.org/JA47GR73XU
AMA
1.Kösebalaban H. Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism. PERCEPTIONS. 2011;16(3):93-114. https://izlik.org/JA47GR73XU
Chicago
Kösebalaban, Hasan. 2011. “Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 16 (3): 93-114. https://izlik.org/JA47GR73XU.
EndNote
Kösebalaban H (October 1, 2011) Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 16 3 93–114.
IEEE
[1]H. Kösebalaban, “Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism”, PERCEPTIONS, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 93–114, Oct. 2011, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA47GR73XU
ISNAD
Kösebalaban, Hasan. “Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 16/3 (October 1, 2011): 93-114. https://izlik.org/JA47GR73XU.
JAMA
1.Kösebalaban H. Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism. PERCEPTIONS. 2011;16:93–114.
MLA
Kösebalaban, Hasan. “Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 16, no. 3, Oct. 2011, pp. 93-114, https://izlik.org/JA47GR73XU.
Vancouver
1.Hasan Kösebalaban. Turkey and the New Middle East: Between Liberalism and Realism. PERCEPTIONS [Internet]. 2011 Oct. 1;16(3):93-114. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA47GR73XU