Is the Nuclear Cascade Story in the Middle East Real?

Abstract

In the highly intricate conditions of current global security, the determination and assessment of where the international community is standing at the end of the NPT Review Conference related to the Middle East’s nuclear realities gains importance. For this reason, this paper aims to focus on two important questions. The first is related to the highly debated issue of whether there is any chance of a nuclear cascade becoming a reality in the Middle East assuming that the Iranian nuclear crisis is not been solved and remains in stalemate. The second question tries asks whether some members of the P-5’s new counter-proliferation attempts that are introduced to the Middle East region have any chance of working at all

Keywords

• Ballistic Missile, Extended Deterrence, Nuclear Proliferation, Security Guarantee, NPT, CTBT, FMCT, START, IAEA.

References

1. ‘‘USA Signs 123 Agreement with UAE’’, at http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/newsarticle. aspx?id=24392 [last visited 30 January 2011].
2. Daniel Horner, ‘‘IAEA Board Approves Fuel Bank Plan’’, Armscontrol Today, at http://www. armscontrol.org/act/2011_01-02/Fuel%20Bank [last visited 30 January 2011].
3. Nurşin Ateşoğlu Güney, “Nükleer Silahsızlanma: Engeller ve Yeni Pazarlıklar Üzerine Kısa Bir Analiz”, SAREM Stratejik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Vol.14, No. 8 (January 2010), pp. 69- 97.
4. Hans M. Kristensen, “Nuclear Posture Review to Reduce Regional Role of Nuclear Weapons”, FAS Strategic Security Blog, at http://www.fas.org/blog/ssp/2010/02/nukemission.php [last visited 28 January 2011].
5. Catherine M. Kelleher and Scott L. Warren, “Getting to Zero Starts Here: Tactical Nuclear Weapons”, Armscontrol Today, at http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2009_10/Kelleher [last visited 20 January 2011] .
6. Nurşin Ateşoğlu Güney, “Where Do we Stand in the Field of Nuclear Disarmament: What is Next after the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START)?”, Policy Brief Political Trends Center (GPOT), at http://www.gpotcenter.org/dosyalar/PB25_2011_NuclearDisarmament_ Guney.pdf, [last visited 14 July 11].
7. Clark A. Murdock, “Exploring the Nuclear Posture Implications of Extended Deterrence and Assurance”, at http://csis.org/files/publication/100222_Murdock_NuclearPosture_ Print.pdf [last visited 19 January 2011].
8. “The Nuclear Posture Review Report”, at http://www.defense.gov/npr/docs/2010%20 Nuclear%20Posture%20Review%20Report.pdf [last visited 05 January 2011].

9. Ibid.; see also, “Quadrennial Defense Review Report, February 2010”, at http://www. defense.gov/qdr/images/QDR_as_of_12Feb10_1000.pdf [last visited 3 January 2011].
10. Miles A. Pomper and Cole J. Harvey, “Beyond Missile Defense: Alternative Means of to Address Iran’s Ballistic Missile Threat”, at http://www.armscontrol.org/act/2010_10/ Pomper-Harvey [last visited 2 January 2011].
11. “The Arms-Dynamic Peace Maker: Ballistic Missile Defense in the Middle East”, at
12. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/The+arms-dynamic+pacemaker%3A+ballistic-missile+defen se+in+the+Middle...-a0216339069 [last visited 12 December 2010].
13. “The National Security Strategy May 2010”, at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/ files/rss_viewer/national_security_strategy.pdf [last visited 23 January 2011].
14. “The Arms-Dynamic Peace Maker: Ballistic Missile”. 15 Ibid.
15. “2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the Treaty on the Non-proliferation of Nuclear Weapons: Final Document”, at http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=NPT/ CONF.2010/50 (VOL.I) [last visited 10 December 2010].
16. However, most of the states of the Middle East have explained their new demand for nuclear power as for diversifying their energy sources. These states have said that they want to overcome their continuing and increasing dependence on oil and gas.
17. Mark Fitzpatrick, “Nuclear Programmes in the Middle East: In the Shadow of Iran”, IISS Strategic Dossier, (May 2008), pp. 7-9.
18. “Obama’s Prague Speech on Nuclear Weapons: Full Text”, Huffington Post, 5 April 2009.
19. ‘‘New Start Ratified, so What’s Next for Arms Control?’’, Foreign Policy, (January 2011) at http://thecable.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2010/12/22/new_start_ratified_so_whats_next_ for_arms_control [last visited 31 January 11]; “New START: Senate Approval of New START”, at http://www.state.gov/t/avc/newstart/index.htm [last visited 2 February 2011].
20. Nurşin Ateşoğlu Güney, “The New Version of the Old History: Global Change, the Iranian Nuclear Crisis and the USA”, The Global Studies, Vol.2, No. 4 (2009), pp.9-15.
21. Fitzpatrick, ‘‘Nuclear Programmes’’, pp.5-165. 23 Ibid.
22. “The UAE 123 Agreement: A Model for the Region?”, at http://csis.org/files/ attachments/091023_Pickering%20Summary.pdf [last visited 30 January 2011].
23. Extended Deterrence consists in extending the logic of deterrence to a third party, that is, persuading a potential adversary that the cost of attacking a protected country would exceed its benefits through a ‘security guarantee’ given to the protected party. See, Bruno Tertrais, “The Future of Extended Deterrence: A Brainstorming Paper”, Perspectives on Extended Deterrence Recherches & Documents, at http://www. Frstrategie.org/barreFRS/publications/ rd/2010/RD_211003.pdf [last visited 25 January 2011].
24. The United States, European Union, Turkey, Australia, South Korea, and other states have proposed that the providers of nuclear technology and material in the 45 member Nuclear Suppliers Group should be requiring that any state receiving this kind of cooperation implement the Additional Protocol. See, George Perkovich, “Abolishing Nuclear Weapons: Why the United States Should Lead”, Endowment for International Peace, at http://www. carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=22297 [last visited 10 September 2010].
25. Jan Ruzicka and Nicholas J. Wheeler, “The Puzzle of Trusting Relationships in the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty”, International Affairs, Vol. 86, No. 1 (January 2010), pp. 69-85.
26. Nurşin Ateşoğlu Güney, “Nükleer Silahların Geleceği Ne Olacak?”,Görüş, No. 64 (October 2010), pp. 74-76.