Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap

Volume: 16 Number: 2 October 1, 2011
  • Mark Fıtzpatrıck
EN

Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap

Abstract

The nuclear fuel swap that was proposed by the USA in October 2009, accepted by Iran, then rejected, and finally accepted again under conditions rejected by the West, was never a solution to the nuclear crisis. Tangential to the main issues, the deal offered only a temporary respite from the threat posed by Iran’s sensitive nuclear programs. Intended as a confidencebuilding measure, the deal has only sown more suspicion, and the attempt in May 2010 by Brazil and Turkey to renew the agreement served to widen the circle of distrust. Yet the precedent of sending Iranian enriched uranium out of the country and thereby reducing its stockpile still holds promise. The question is whether or not Iran is determined to have a nuclearweapons capability. Even if it is, containment and deterrence policies may help to keep that capability latent, but unrestricted growth of Iran’s enrichment program could still trigger military action

References

  1. Portions of this paper draw on the author’s article on “Iran: The Fragile Promise of the Fuel-Swap Plan”, Survival, Vol.52, No. 3 (June–July 2010), pp. 67–94.
  2. In theory, a bomb could be made using 20% HEU, but it would be impractically large, weighing at least 400kg. Weapons designers prefer to use HEU enriched to over 90%, which is considered weapons grade.
  3. IAEA, “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Report by the Director General”, GOV/2003/75, 10 November 2003, pp. 26–28.
  4. “Ahmadinejad: Iran Ready to Buy N. Fuel from US”, Fars News Agency, at http://english.farsnews. com/newstext.php?nn=8807151645 [last visited 13 October 2010].
  5. Iran commonly refers to the enrichment level as 20%, which is the rounded-up figure (from 19.75%) used throughout much of the rest of this article.
  6. IAEA, “Implementation of the NPT Safeguards Agreement in the Islamic Republic of Iran: Report by the Director General”, GOV/2010/46, 6 September 2010, p. 7; The equipment is for the conversion of 20% enriched UF6 to U3O8.
  7. Thomas Erdbrink and William Branigan, “In Iran, Nuclear Issue is also a Medical One”, Washington Post, 20 December 2009.
  8. See, Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission, Weapons of Terror: Freeing the World of Nuclear, Biological and Chemical Arms, (June 2006), p. 72.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

Mark Fıtzpatrıck This is me

Publication Date

October 1, 2011

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2011 Volume: 16 Number: 2

APA
Fıtzpatrıck, M. (2011). Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, 16(2), 27-41. https://izlik.org/JA93AT79JH
AMA
1.Fıtzpatrıck M. Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap. PERCEPTIONS. 2011;16(2):27-41. https://izlik.org/JA93AT79JH
Chicago
Fıtzpatrıck, Mark. 2011. “Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 16 (2): 27-41. https://izlik.org/JA93AT79JH.
EndNote
Fıtzpatrıck M (October 1, 2011) Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 16 2 27–41.
IEEE
[1]M. Fıtzpatrıck, “Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap”, PERCEPTIONS, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 27–41, Oct. 2011, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA93AT79JH
ISNAD
Fıtzpatrıck, Mark. “Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs 16/2 (October 1, 2011): 27-41. https://izlik.org/JA93AT79JH.
JAMA
1.Fıtzpatrıck M. Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap. PERCEPTIONS. 2011;16:27–41.
MLA
Fıtzpatrıck, Mark. “Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap”. PERCEPTIONS: Journal of International Affairs, vol. 16, no. 2, Oct. 2011, pp. 27-41, https://izlik.org/JA93AT79JH.
Vancouver
1.Mark Fıtzpatrıck. Containing the Iranian Nuclear Crisis: The Useful Precedent of a Fuel Swap. PERCEPTIONS [Internet]. 2011 Oct. 1;16(2):27-41. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA93AT79JH