FINISHING THE UNFINISHED REVOLUTION: THE RETURN OF YUGOSLAVIA TO EUROPE

Abstract

While the fall of Milosevic on 5 October 2000 was a turning point for the Yugoslav people, it also has far reaching implications for regional developments in the Balkans. Milosevic was not the only dictator who was toppled, but what this event portends for the structure and functioning of the international system is even more important. Tito's Yugoslavia was a unique state in terms of its foreign policy it was the only socialist country in Eastern Europe that was outside the Soviet orbit and was also a founder of the Non-Aligned Movement , its treatment of nationalities and minorities and the way Yugoslav leaders understood and implemented socialism self-management, developed by Edvard Kardelj . With Milosevic's Yugoslavia all of these characteristics turned upside down and, the once respected and prestigious country of the Cold War years and the most likely EU candidate among the East European countries, became the pariah state of the 1990s

References

1. Anthony Lake, 'Confronting the Backlash States', Foreign Affairs, March-April 1994, p. 45-46. See also the White House document, 'A National Security Strategy of Engagement and Enlargement'
2. Washington, The White House, 1995.
3. Stan Markotich, 'Milosevic's Renewed Attack on the Independent Media', Transition, March 1995, pp. 26-28; Roksanda Incic, 'Universities under Fire', Transition, October 1998, pp. 19-21.
4. Robert Thomas, The Politics of Serbia in the 1990s, New York, Columbia University Press, 1999, p. 171.
5. For criticism of the Rambouillet talks see: Roy Gutman, 'The Collapse of Serbia?', World Policy Journal, spring 1999, pp. 12-15; Michael Macgwire, 'Why Did We Bomb Belgrade?', International Affairs, January 2000.
6. Stephen Larrabee, 'US Policy in the Balkans: from Containment to Strategic Reentanglement in Constantine Danopoulos and Kostas Messas (eds.), Crisis in the Balkans: Views from the Participant, Boulder, Westview, 1997, p. 276.
7. Bodo Hombach, 'Stability Pact for South-Eastern Europe: a New Perspective for the Region', Perceptions, September-November 2000.
8. Former Yugoslav Foreign Minister, Zivadin Jovanovic, estimates the damage at more than $100 billion. 'The Heart of Freedom Beats in Yugoslavia', Review of International Affairs, April-June , p. 5. International Herald Tribune, 29 September 2000.

9. Eric Gordy, 'Why Milosevic Still?', Current History, March 200, pp. 99-102. International Herald Tribune 10 October 2000.
10. International Herald Tribune, 20 September 2000. Tanjug, 27 October 2000.
11. International Herald Tribune, 29 September 2000.
12. For instance, see: Neal Ascherson, Observer, 8 October 2000; Misha Glenny, International Herald Tribune, 9 October 2000.
13. International Herald Tribune, 11 October 2000; Guardian, 9 October 2000.
14. Steven Erlinger, 'Talks Reported on an Exit Strategy for Milosevic', New York Times, 17 June See also www.stratfor.com for an analysis of the West's alleged plan, 'Toppling Milosevic: the Carrot Instead of the Stick', 26 June 2000.
15. Der Spiegel, 1 January 2001. Guardian, 17 October 2000.
16. Steven Erlanger and Roger Cohen, ''Organized Spontaneity' by the Opposition Brought down Milosevic', International Herald Tribune, 16 October 2000.
17. International Herald Tribune, 9 November 2000.
18. Cumhuriyet, 9 October 2000.
19. Frank Cilliffo and George Salmoiraghi, 'And the Winner is ... the Albanian Mafia', Washington Quarterly, autumn 1999, pp. 21-25.
20. Daniel Williams, 'Serbia's New Respectability Makes Kosovars Nervous', International Herald Tribune, 17 October 2000.
21. International Herald Tribune, 27 October 2000.