A Model for the Instructional Factors of Curatorial Teaching in Design Education

Volume: 5 Number: 3 September 1, 2018
  • - Chia-hua
  • - Lin
EN

A Model for the Instructional Factors of Curatorial Teaching in Design Education

Abstract

The increased demand for design exhibitions directly reflects the demand for designer-curators to manage cultural policies and social needs. However, in the current design education system in Taiwan, no curation-related curriculum planning exists. Therefore, this study attempted to design a practical curation course focused on “designer curated exhibition” experiential learning. This study encouraged design students to consider the formation of exhibitions from a comprehensive point of view. The teaching and learning process gave rise to a model of the instructional factors of curatorial education. We found a positive correlation between “learning process and motive” and “learning effectiveness.” Moreover, positive correlations were observed between “curation theories,” “learning processes and motives,” and “curatorial experience.” This demonstrates that curatorial practice increases the curator’s ability to apply curatorial theory, and excites the curator’s motivation to learn. However, the performance of self-evaluation reflects a lack of self-confidence and recognition; this lack may be caused by the restrictions of time and space, and by the complexity of curating teamwork communication. This model will continuously be translated and validated through the curriculum in the future, and the course will encourage students’ self-learning to enhance practical teaching and planning.

Keywords

References

  1. Betz, E. & Klingensmith, J. (1970). The measurement and analysis of college student satisfaction, Measurement
  2. and Evaluation in Guidance, 3, 110–18.
  3. Ernest, E, B., Zafer, M., & Lizzie, M. (2009). Artist, evaluator and curator: three viewpoints on interactive art, evaluation and audience experience, Digital Creativity, 20(3), 141–51. doi:10.1080/14626260903083579
  4. Field, H. S. & Giles, W. G. (1980). Student satisfaction with graduate education: dimensionality and assessment is a school of business, Education Research Quarterly, 5(2), 66–73.
  5. Heinich, N. & Pollak, M. (1996). From museum curator to exhibition auteur: inventing a singular position, in R. Greenberg, et al. [Eds] Thinking about exhibitions. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 231–250.
  6. Piccoli, G. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: a research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training, MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 401–27.
  7. Scardamalia, M. & Bereiter, C. (2006). Knowledge building: theory, pedagogy, and technology, in R. K. Sawyer [Ed] The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 97–119.
  8. Lin, P. (2010). The examination of Taiwanese curators in their practice and education, Artouch Magazine, 219, 178–81.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

- Chia-hua This is me

Publication Date

September 1, 2018

Submission Date

-

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 5 Number: 3

APA
Chia-hua, -, & Lin, -. (2018). A Model for the Instructional Factors of Curatorial Teaching in Design Education. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 5(3), 63-71. https://doi.org/10.17220/ijpes.2018.03.006