Salutojenik Yaklaşım Açısından Aydınlatma Tasarımının Sağlık ve İyi Oluş Üzerindeki Etkisi: Bir Kahve Evi’nde Vaka Çalışması

Abstract

Bireylerin iç mekânlarda daha fazla zaman geçirmesi, onların konforunu, performansını, sağlığını ve refahını etkilemektedir. Çeşitli ihtiyaçlar doğrultusunda sayıları hızla artan kahve evlerinin yeni dünyada sosyalleşmek ve çalışmak için tercih edildiği bilinmektedir. İyi tasarlanmış bir ortam yaratmak, bireyin sosyal, psikolojik ve davranışsal örüntülerini de olumlu yönde etkilemektedir. Bu durumda, salutojenik bir tasarım, sağlığı ve iyi oluşu teşvik eden iç ortamlar yaratmaya odaklanmaktadır. Doğal ve yapay aydınlatma, renk, akustik ve termal konfor gibi tüm çevresel kalite faktörleri dahil olmak üzere insan konforunu, sağlığını ve refahını iyileştirmek için kanıta dayalı bir tasarım stratejisidir. Aydınlatma tasarımı, kapalı bir ortamda performansımızı, ruh halimizi, odaklanmamızı ve genel refahımızı artırabilir. Sağlık ve ofis tasarımı alanlarında en yaygın olan, tıp ve tasarım alanlarında otuz yılı aşkın bir süredir devam eden araştırmalarla desteklenen salutojenik tasarım modeli, konfor, sağlık ve esenliğe yardımcı olmak için yenilikçi bir tasarım stratejisi sunmaktadır. Bu bakış açısına dayanan bu çalışma, yapay aydınlatma tasarımını göz önünde bulundurarak seçilen kahve evindeki kullanıcıların sağlık ve iyi oluşunu salutojenik bir tasarım yaklaşımıyla değerlendirmektedir. Cinsiyetler, yaş grupları ve pozitif ve negatif öznel ruh hallerini ölçen sıfatlar arasındaki farklar ve SOC-13 Ölçeği ile Algılanan Çevresel Kalite Endeksi arasındaki korelasyon analiz edildi. "Sonuçlar" bölümü test bulgularının kapsamlı bir açıklamasını sunmaktadır. Bu çalışma bireylerin ruh hallerinin, hislerinin, sağlıklarının ve iyi oluşlarının mekandaki fiziksel koşullarla nasıl ilişkilendirilebileceğine dair bir örnek teşkil ederken, aynı zamanda kullanıcı deneyimini çeşitli yönlerden iyileştirmek için salutojenik bir tasarım yaklaşımının kahve evlerine nasıl dahil edilebileceğinin daha iyi anlaşılmasına olanak sağlayacaktır.

Keywords

• İç mekân
• kahve evi
• sağlık ve iyi oluş
• aydınlatma
• salutojenik yaklaşım

The Impact of Lighting Design in terms of a Salutogenic Approach on Health and Well-Being: A Case Study in a Coffee House

Abstract

Individuals spend more time in interiors, which affects their comfort, health, and well-being. It is known that coffee houses, which are increasing rapidly in line with various needs, are preferred for socializing and working in a new world. Creating a well-designed environment also positively impacts an individual’s social, psychological, and behavioral patterns. In this case, a salutogenic design creates interior environments promoting health and well-being. It is an evidence-based design strategy for improving human comfort, health, and well-being, including all environmental quality factors, such as natural and artificial lighting, color, acoustic, and thermal comfort. The lighting design can improve our performance, mood, focus, and overall well-being in an interior environment. A salutogenic design model, which is most prevalent in healthcare and workplace design and is supported by over three decades of research in the medical and design fields, provides an innovative design strategy to aid in comfort, health, and well-being. Based on this perspective, this study evaluates the health and well-being of the users in the selected coffee house with a salutogenic design approach by considering artificial lighting design. The differences between genders, age groups, and the adjectives measuring positive and negative subjective moods, and the correlation between the SOC-13 Scale and the Perceived Environmental Quality Index were analyzed. The “Results” section provides a thorough explanation of the test findings. While this study serve as an example of how individuals’ moods, feelings, health, and well-being can be linked to physical conditions in the space, it will also provide a better understanding of how a salutogenic design approach can be incorporated into coffee shops to improve user experience in various of aspects.

Keywords

• Interior environment
• coffee house
• health and well-being
• lighting
• salutogenic approach

References

1. Andrade, C. C., Lima, M. L., Devlin, A. S., & Hernández, B. (2016). Is it the place or the people? Disentangling the effects of hospitals’ physical and social environments on well-being. Environment and Behavior, 48(2), 299-323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514536182
2. Avcı, A. N., & Memikoğlu, İ. (2021). Evaluating effectiveness of LED and OLED lights on user visual comfort and reading performance. A|Z ITU Journal of the Faculty of Architecture, 18(2), 397-411. https://doi.org/doi:%2010.5505/itujfa.2021.22438
3. Avcı, A. N., & Akbay, S. (2022). Visual comfort assessment of OLED lighting in an indoor office environment. GRID-Architecture, Planning and Design Journal, 5(2), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.37246/grid.993713
4. Antonovsky, A. (1987). Unraveling the mystery of health: How people manage stress and stay well. San Francisco, 175.
5. Antonovsky, A. (1996). The salutogenic model as a theory to guide health promotion. Health Promotion International, 11(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/11.1.11
6. Bergefurt, L., Appel-Meulenbroek, R., & Arentze, T. (2022). The effects of salutogenic workplace characteristics on productivity, stress, concentration, and mood in a virtual office environment. Paper presented at 3rd Transdisciplinary Workplace Research Conference, Milan, Italy.
7. Boubekri, M., Cheung, I. N., Reid, K. J., Wang, C. H., & Zee, P. C. (2014). Impact of windows and daylight exposure on overall health and sleep quality of office workers: a case-control pilot study. Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, 10(6), 603-611. https://doi.org/10.5664/jcsm.3780
8. Carlucci, S., Causone, F., De Rosa, F., & Pagliano, L. (2015). A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47, 1016-1033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.062

9. Clark, S. C. (2000). Work/family border theory: A new theory of work/family balance. Human Relations, 53(6), 747-770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700536001
10. Dushkova, D., & Ignatieva, M. (2020). New trends in urban environmental health research: from geography of diseases to therapeutic landscapes and healing gardens. Geography, Environment, Sustainability, 13(1), 159-171. https://doi.org/10.24057/2071-9388-2019-99
11. Eriksson, M., & Lindström, B. (2005). Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59(6), 460-466. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2003.018085
12. Fisher, J. D. (1974). Situation specific variables as determinants of perceived environmental aesthetic quality and perceived crowdedness. Journal of Research in Personality, 8, 177-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(74)90019-1
13. Garner, B. (2015). Interpersonal coffee drinking communication rituals. International Journal of Marketing and Business Communication, 4(4), 1-12.
14. Golembiewski, J. A. (2010). Start making sense: Applying a salutogenic model to architectural design for psychiatric care. Facilities, 28(3/4), 100-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/02632771011023096
15. Gorman, J. A., Scoglio, A. A., Smolinsky, J., Russo, A., & Drebing, C. E. (2018). Veteran coffee socials: A community-building strategy for enhancing community reintegration of veterans. Community Mental Health Journal, 54, 1189-1197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-018-0288-y
16. Hanson, A. (2007). Workplace health promotion: a salutogenic approach. AuthorHouse.
17. Heerwagen, J. H., Heubach, J. G., Montgomery, J., & Weimer, W. C. (1995). Environmental design, work, and well being: managing occupational stress through changes in the workplace environment. Aaohn Journal, 43(9), 458-468. https://doi.org/10.1177/216507999504300904
18. Jang, H. W., & Lee, S. B. (2019). Applying effective sensory marketing to sustainable coffee shop business management. Sustainability, 11(22), 6430. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11226430
19. Oldenburg, R. (1999a). The great good place: Cafes, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Da Capo Press.
20. Oldenburg, R. (1999b). The Great Good Place. New York: Marlowe & Company.
21. Park, N. S., Jang, Y., Chiriboga, D. A., & Chung, S. (2019). Social network types, health, and well-being of older Asian Americans. Aging & Mental Health, 23(11), 1569-1577. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2018.1506751
22. Roskams, M. & Haynes, B. (2020), “Salutogenic workplace design: a conceptual framework for supporting sense of coherence through environmental resources”, Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 139-153. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCRE-01-2019-0001
23. Salonen, H., Lahtinen, M., Lappalainen, S., Nevala, N., Knibbs, L. D., Morawska, L., & Reijula, K. (2013). Physical characteristics of the indoor environment that affect health and wellbeing in healthcare facilities: A review. Intelligent Buildings International, 5(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508975.2013.764838
24. Sandstrom, G. M., & Dunn, E. W. (2014). Is efficiency overrated? Minimal social interactions lead to belonging and positive affect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(4), 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613502990
25. Scott, S. (1989). Preference, mystery, and visual attributes of interiors: A study of relationships, [Doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin- Madison], Dissertation Abstracts International, 50 (11-A), 3386.
26. Spence, C., Puccinelli, N. M., Grewal, D., & Roggeveen, A. L. (2014). Store atmospherics: A multisensory perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 31(7), 472-488. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20709
27. Tsai, C. Y., Wang, M. C., Liao, W. T., Lu, J. H., Sun, P. H., Lin, B. Y. J., & Breen, G. M. (2007). Hospital outpatient perceptions of the physical environment of waiting areas: the role of patient characteristics on atmospherics in one academic medical center. BMC Health Services Research, 7, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-7-198
28. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6) p.1063. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
29. Yeang, K., & Dilani, A. (Eds.). (2022). Ecological and salutogenic design for a sustainable healthy global society. In K. Yeang & A. Dilani (Eds.), Ecological and Salutogenic Design: For a Sustainable Healthy Global Society (pp. 2-42). Cambridge Scholars Press.