BÜTÜNLEŞİK AMACA YÖNELİK DAVRANIŞ MODELİ İLE ÇEVRECİ ÜRÜN SATIN ALMA NİYETİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Abstract

Çevresel problemlerin giderek arttığı ve etkilerinin ağır şekilde yaşandığı günümüzde bireylerin çevre bilincine ve çabaya sahip olmaları önemlidir. Bu noktada çevreci ürün satın alma niyetlerini etkileyen faktörleri davranışsal süreçleri içerisinde açıklamak, çevre için atılacak adımlarda yol gösterici olabilecektir. Bu doğrultuda çevreci ürün satın alma niyetinin öncüllerini tespit etmek, bireylerin karar verme süreçlerini etkileyen motivasyonları anlamak ve açıklayabilmek için çevreci ürün satın alma niyeti amaca yönelik davranış modeli kapsamında incelenmiştir. Çalışma Erzurum merkez ilçede 300 kişinin katılımıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Toplanan veriler yapısal eşitlik analizi ile analiz edilmiş; çevreci ürün satın alma niyeti üzerinde en yüksek etkiye sahip değişkenlerin davranışsal istek ve öngörülen pozitif duygular olduğu görülmüştür. En düşük etkiye öngörülen negatif duyguların sahip olduğu ve modelde yer alan davranışsal tutum, sübjektif norm, algılanan davranışsal kontrol, davranışın geçmişte tekrarlanma sıklığı, çevresel kaygı ve algılanan tüketici etkinliği değişkenlerinin de çevreci ürün satın alma niyeti üzerinde anlamlı etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir

Keywords

• Amaca yönelik davranış modeli,çevreci davranış,çevreci ürün satın alma niyeti

INVESTIGATION OF PROENVIRONMENTAL PRODUCT PURCHASE INTENTION VIA INTEGRATED GOAL-DİRECTED BEHAVIOR MODEL

Abstract

Nowadays, the environmental problems are gradually increase and its effects are being felt severe, so it is important that individuals have environmental consciousness and effort. In this point, explaining the factors affecting the pro-environmental products purchase intention within the behavioural processes, it may be a guide for the environmental activity. In this direction, pro-environmental product purchase intention was investigated via integrated goal-directed behaviour model purpose of determine the antecedent of proenvironmental product purchase intention and motivation of individuals affecting decision making processes. The investigation was carried out with the participation of 300 people in the central district of Erzurum. The collected data was analysed by structural equation analysis; it was seen that the variables having the highest effect on the pro-environmental product purchase intention are the behavioural desire and the positive anticipated emotions. The negative anticipated emotions have the lowest effect. Also, the variables at the research model that behavioural attitude, subjective norm, perceived behavioural control, frequency of past behaviour, environmental concern, perceived consumer effectiveness have significant effects on the pro-environmental product purchase intention

Keywords

• Goal-directed behavior model,pro-environmental behavior,pro-environmental product purchase intention

References

1. Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions To Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action Control (Pp. 11-39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://people. umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.intervention.pdf. asp (20.02.2018)
2. Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179-211. https://www.sciencedirect. com/science/article/pii/074959789190020T. asp (20.02.2018)
3. Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and Operation of Attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1): 27-58. https://search.proquest.com/docview/205845078?pq-origsite=gscholar. asp (20.02.2018)
4. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, And the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4): 665-683. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2002.tb00236.x
5. Akehurst, G., Afonso, C. ve Martins Gonçalves, H. (2012). Re-Examining Green Purchase Behaviour and the Green Consumer Profile: New Evidences. Management Decision, 50(5): 972-988. doi: 10.1108/00251741211227726
6. Armitage, C. J. ve Conner, M. (2002). Reducing Fat Intake: Interventions Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. D. R. Rutter ve L. Quine (Ed.), İçinde Changing Health Behavior: Intervention and Research with Social Cognition Models (s. 87-104). UK: Mcgraw-Hill Education.
7. Austin, J. T. ve Vancouver, J. B. (1996). Goal Constructs in Psychology: Structure, Process, and Content. Psychological Bulletin, 120(3): 338- 375. http:// psycnet.apa.org/buy/1996-01405-002. asp (12.02.2018)
8. Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). The Self-Regulation of Attitudes, Intentions, and Behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55 (2): 178-204. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2786945. asp (12.02.2018)

9. Bamberg, S. (2013). Changing Environmentally Harmful Behaviors: A Stage Model of Self-Regulated Behavioral Change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34: 151-159. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.002
10. Başoda, A. ve Aylan, S. (2014). Turistlerin Karar Verme Sürecinin Amaca Yönelik Davranış Modeli ile Değerlendirilmesi: Mevlana Şeb-i Arus Törenleri Örneği. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 25(1): 88-104. http://hdl. handle.net/11492/1010. asp (22.02.2018)
11. Brown, T. J. (1999). Antecedents of Culturally Significant Tourist Behavior. Annals of Tourism Research, 26(3): 676-700. doi: 10.1016/S0160- 7383(99)00004-3
12. Çabuk, S., Nakiboğlu, A. G. B. ve Keleş, C. (2008). Tüketicilerin Yeşil Ürün Satın Alma Davranışlarının Sosyo-demografik Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 17(1): 85-102.
13. Carrus, G., Passafaro, P. ve Bonnes, M. (2008). Emotions, Habits and Rational Choices İn Ecological Behaviours: The Case of Recycling and Use Of Public Transportation. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 28(1): 51-62. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.09.003
14. Chan, R. Y. ve Lau, L. B. (2002). Explaining Green Purchasing Behavior: A Cross-Cultural Study on American and Chinese Consumers. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 14(2-3): 9-40. doi: 10.1300/ J046v14n02_02
15. Chekima, B., Wafa, S. A. W. S. K., Igau, O. A., Chekima, S. ve Sondoh Jr, S. L. (2016). Examining Green Consumerism Motivational Drivers: Does Premium Price And Demographics Matter To Green Purchasing?. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112 (4): 3436-3450. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.102
16. Cho, Y. N., Thyroff, A., Rapert, M. I., Park, S. Y. ve Lee, H. J. (2013). To Be or Not To Be Green: Exploring Individualism And Collectivism As Antecedents Of Environmental Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 66(8): 1052- 1059. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.020
17. Diamond, D. (2009). The Impact of Government Incentives for Hybrid-Electric Vehicles: Evidence from US states. Energy Policy, 37(3): 972-983. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.094
18. Drozdenko, R., Jensen, M. ve Coelho, D. (2011). Pricing of Green Products: Premiums Paid, Consumer Characteristics and Incentives. International Journal of Business, Marketing, and Decision Sciences, 4(1): 106-116. https://www. researchgate.net/profile/Ronald_Drozdenko/publication/267725435_ Pricing_of_Green_Prducts_Premiums_Paid_Consumer_Characteristics_ and_Incentives/links/54b655ee0cf2e68eb27e7b39/Pricing-of-Green- Products-Premiums-Paid-Consumer-Characteristics-and-Incentives.pdf. asp (22.02.2018)
19. Dunlap, R. E. ve York, R. (2008). The Globalization of Environmental Concern and the Limits of the Post-materialist Values Explanation: Evidence from Four Multinational Surveys. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(3): 529-563. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2008.00127.x
20. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G. ve Jones, R. E. (2000). New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3): 425-442. doi: 10.1111/0022-4537.00176
21. Ellen, P. S., Wiener, J. L. ve Cobb-Walgren, C. (1991). The Role of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness in Motivating Environmentally Conscious Behaviors. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2): 102-117. http:// www.jstor.org/stable/30000238. asp (03.03.2018)
22. Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory And Research. Addison Wesley: Reading, MA. http://worldcat.org/isbn/0201020890. asp (03.03.2018)
23. Fishbein, M. ve Ajzen, I. (2011). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Birleşik Krallık: Taylor ve Francis. http://books.google. com/books. asp (21.02.2018)
24. Fujii, S. (2006). Environmental Concern, Attitude toward Frugality, And Ease of Behavior as Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behavior Intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26(4): 262-268. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.003
25. Gallagher, K. S. ve Muehlegger, E. (2011). Giving Green to Get Green? Incentives and Consumer Adoption of Hybrid Vehicle Technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61(1): 1-15. doi: 10.1016/j. jeem.2010.05.004
26. Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D. ve Cronin Jr, J. J. (2013). Against the Green: A Multi-Method Examination of the Barriers to Green Consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jretai.2012.10.001
27. Godin, G. ve Kok, G. (1996). The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of Its Applications to Health-Related Behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2): 87-98. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-11.2.87
28. Green, K., Morton, B. ve New, S. (2000). Greening Organizations: Purchasing, Consumption, And Innovation. Organization & Environment, 13(2): 206- 225. doi: 10.1177/1086026600132003
29. Grunert, S. C. (1993). Everybody Seems Concerned About the Environment: But is This Concern Reflected in (Danish) Consumers’ Food Choice?. E-European Advances in Consumer Research, 1, 428-433. http://acrwebsite. org/volumes/11481/volumes/e01/E-01. asp (03.03.2018)
30. Han, H. ve Ryu, K. (2012). The Theory of Repurchase Decision-Making (TRD): Identifying the Critical Factors in the Post-Purchase Decision-Making Process. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(3): 786-797. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2011.09.015
31. Han, H., Hsu, L. T. J. ve Sheu, C. (2010). Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior to Green Hotel Choice: Testing the Effect of Environmental Friendly Activities. Tourism Management, 31(3): 325-334. doi: 10.1016/j. tourman.2009.03.013
32. Hartmann, P., Apaolaza, V., D’Souza, C., Barrutia, J. M. ve Echebarria, C. (2014). Environmental Threat Appeals in Green Advertising: The Role of Fear Arousal and Coping Efficacy. International Journal of Advertising, 33(4): 741-765. doi: 10.2501/IJA-33-4-741-765
33. Hessami, H. Z., Yousefi, P. ve Goudarzi, G. (2013). The Conceptual Model of Effective Factors on Consumers, Green Purchasing Intentions. Social Influence, 2(7): 10-17. http://www.ijeit.com/vol%202/Issue%207/ IJEIT1412201301_02.pdf. asp (03.03.2018)
34. Kaiser, F. G. ve Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-Directed Conservation Behavior: The Specific Composition of a General Performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7): 1531-1544. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2003.06.003
35. Kaufmann, H. R., Panni, M. F. A. K. ve Orphanidou, Y. (2012). Factors Affecting Consumers’ Green Purchasing Behavior: An Integrated Conceptual Framework. The Amfıteatru Economıc Journal, 14(31): 50-69. http://www. amfiteatrueconomic.ro/temp/Article_1100.pdf. asp (03.03.2018)
36. Kim, M. J. ve Preis, M. W. (2016). Why Seniors Use Mobile Devices: Applying an Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 33(3): 404-423.doi: 10.1080/10548408.2015.1064058
37. Kim, M., Lee, M. J., Lee, C. ve Song, H. (2012). Does Gender Affect Korean Tourists’ Overseas Travel? Applying the Model of Goal-Directed Behavior, Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 17 (5): 509-533. doi:10.1080/1 0941665.2011.627355
38. Kim, Y. (2011). Understanding Green Purchase: The Influence of Collectivism, Personal Values and Environmental Attitudes, and the Moderating Effect of Perceived Consumer Effectiveness. Seoul Journal of Business, 17(1): 65-92. https://search.proquest.com/docview/884626957?accountid=8403. asp (13.03.2018)
39. Kim, Y. ve Choi, S. M. (2005). Antecedents of Green Purchase Behavior: An Examination of Collectivism, Environmental Concern, and PCE. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1): 592-599. http://www.acrwebsite.org/ volumes/v32/acr_vol32_166.pdf. asp (13.03.2018)
40. Knussen, C., Yule, F., MacKenzie, J. ve Wells, M. (2004). An Analysis Of Intentions To Recycle Household Waste: The Roles of Past Behaviour, Perceived Habit, And Perceived Lack Of Facilities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2): 237-246. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2003.12.001
41. Kocagöz, E. ve Dursun, Y. (2010). Algılanan Davranışsal Kontrol, Ajzen’in Teorisinde Nasıl Konumlanır? Alternatif Model Analizleri. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi Sosyal Ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 2010(2), download/5000134390/5000123202. asp (2.03.2018)
42. http://dergipark.ulakbim.gov.tr/kmusekad/article/
43. Kollmuss, A. ve Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind The Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally And What Are The Barriers To Pro-Environmental Behavior?. Environmental Education Research, 8(3): 239-260. doi: 10.1080/13504620220145401
44. Kurtuluş, K. (2004). Pazarlama Araştırmaları, Genişletilmiş 7. Basım, İstanbul: Literatür Yayıncılık.
45. Lam, T. ve Hsu, C. H. (2006). Predicting Behavioral Intention of Choosing a Travel Destination. Tourism Management, 27(4): 589-599. doi: 10.1016/j. tourman.2005.02.003
46. Lee, Y. K., Kim, S., Kim, M. S. ve Choi, J. G. (2014). Antecedents and Interrelationships of Three Types of Pro-Environmental Behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67(10): 2097-2105. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.04.018
47. Leone, L., Perugini, M. ve Ercolani, A. P. (2004). Studying, Practicing, and Mastering: A Test of the Model of Goal-Directed Behavior (MGB) in the Software Learning Domain. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(9): 1945-1973. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02594.x
48. Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B. ve Oskamp, S. (1997). Green Buying: The Influence of Environmental Concern on Consumer Behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2): 189-204. doi: 10.1080/00224549709595430
49. Martínez-Fiestas, M., del Jesus, M. I. V., Sánchez-Fernández, J. ve Montoro-Rios, F. J. (2015). A Psychophysiological Approach for Measuring Response to Messaging: How Consumers Emotionally Process Green Advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 55(2): 192-205. doi: 10.2501/JAR-55-2- 192-205
50. Mitchell, V. W. (1992). Understanding Consumers’ Behaviour: Can Perceived Risk Theory Help?. Management Decision, 30(3): 26-31. doi: 10.1108/00251749210013050
51. Mostafa, M. M. (2007). Gender Differences in Egyptian Consumers’ Green Purchase Behaviour: The Effects of Environmental Knowledge, Concern and Attitude. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(3): 220-229. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2006.00523.x
52. Nakip, M. (2006). Pazarlama araştırmaları, teknikler ve (SPSS destekli) uygulamalar. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
53. Ouellette, J. A. ve Wood, W. (1998). Habit And Intention in Everyday Life: The Multiple Processes By Which Past Behavior Predicts Future Behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1): 54-74. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54
54. Peattie, K. (2001). Golden Goose or Wild Goose? The Hunt for the Green Consumer. Business Strategy and the Environment, 10(4): 187-199. doi: 10.1002/bse.292
55. Perugini, M. ve Bagozzi, R. P. (2001). The Role of Desires and Anticipated Emotions in Goal-Directed Behaviours: Broadening and Deepening the Theory of Planned Behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 79-98. doi: 10.1348/014466601164704
56. Perugini, M. ve Bagozzi, R. P. (2004a). An Alternative View of Pre-Volitional Processes in Decision Making. G. Haddock ve G. R. Maio (Ed.). İçinde Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes: The Cardiff symposium (s. 169-199). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
57. Perugini, M. ve Bagozzi, R. P. (2004b). The Distinction between Desires and Intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(1): 69-84. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.186
58. Perugini, M. ve Conner, M. (2000). Predicting and Understanding Behavioral Volitions: The Interplay between Goals and Behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(5), 705-731. doi: 10.1002/1099-0992(200009/10)30:53.0.CO;2-#
59. Pickett-Baker, J. ve Ozaki, R. (2008). Pro-Environmental Products: Marketing Influence on Consumer Purchase Decision. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25(5): 281-293. doi: 10.1108/07363760810890516
60. Prestwich, A., Perugini, M. ve Hurling, R. (2008). Goal Desires Moderate Intention-Behavior Relations. British Journal of Social Psychology. 47(1): 49-71. doi: 10.1348/014466607X218221
61. Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C. ve Mohamad, O. (2010). Green Product Purchase Intention: Some Insights from a Developing Country. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 54(12): 1419-1427. Doi: 10.1016/j. resconrec.2010.06.007
62. Rex, E. ve Baumann, H. (2007). Beyond Ecolabels: What Green Marketing Can Learn from Conventional Marketing? Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(6): 567-576. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.05.013
63. Schultz, P. (2014). Strategies for Promoting Pro-environmental Behavior: Lots of Tools but Few Instructions. European Psychologist, 19(2): 107-117. Doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000163
64. Schultz, P. W. ve Oskamp, S. (1996). Effort as a Moderator of the Attitude- Behavior Relationship: General Environmental Concern and Recycling. Social Psychology Quarterly, 59(4): 375-383. http://www.jstor.org/ stable/2787078
65. Song, H. J. (2010). Understanding Casino Visitor’s Decision- Making Processes within the Perspective of Responsible Gambling: An Application of The Model of Goal-Directed Behavior. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). USA: Clemson University.
66. Song, H. J., Lee, C. K., Kang, S. K. ve Boo, S. J. (2012). The Effect of Environmentally Friendly Perceptions on Festival Visitors’ Decision-Making Process Using an Extended Model of Goal-Directed Behavior. Tourism Management, 33(6): 1417-1428. doi: 10.1016/j.tourman.2012.01.004
67. Steg, L. ve Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging Pro-Environmental Behaviour: An Integrative Review and Research Agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3): 309-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004
68. Sutton, S. (1994). The Past Predicts the Future: Interpreting Behaviour-Behaviour Relationships in Social Psychological Models of Health Behaviour. D. R. Rutter ve L. Quine (Ed.), İçinde Social Psychology and Health: European Perspectives. (s.71-88). Aldershot, UK: Avebury.
69. Tan, B. C. ve Lau, T. C. (2011). Green Purchase Behavior: Examining the Influence Of Green Environmental Attitude, Perceived Consumer Effectiveness And Specific Green Purchase Attitude. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(8): 559-567. http://shdl.mmu.edu.my/5204/
70. Tanrıkulu, C. (2015). Çevresel Kaygı, Algılanan Tüketici Etkinliği Ve Kollektivismin, Tüketicilerin Yeşil Satın Alma Davranışlarındaki Rolü Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(1): 121-136.
71. Taylor, S. D., Bagozzi, R. P. ve Gaither, C. A. (2005). Decision Making and Effort in the Self-Regulation of Hypertension: Testing Two Competing Theories. British Journal of Health Psychology, 10(4), 505-530. doi: 10.1348/135910704X22376
72. Tırakoğlu, B. (2016). Sigara İçen Kişilerde Sigarayı Bırakmaya Yönelik Niyetin Planlanmış Davranış Teorisine Göre Değerlendirilmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Uludağ Üniversitesi.
73. Truelove, H. B., Carrico, A. R., Weber, E. U., Raimi, K. T. ve Vandenbergh, M. P. (2014). Positive and Negative Spillover of Pro-Environmental Behavior: An Integrative Review and Theoretical Framework. Global Environmental Change, 29: 127-138. Doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.004
74. Tsai, H. T. ve Bagozzi, R. P. (2014). Contribution Behavior in Vırtual Communities: Cognitive, Emotional and Social Influences. MIS Quarterly, 38(1): 143-163. https:// www.researchgate.net/profile/Richard_Bagozzi/publication/261960872_ Contribution_Behavior_in_Virtual_Communities_Cogntiive_ Emotional_and_Social_Influences/links/57c6261a08ae6db2cc76abf0/ Contribution-Behavior-in-Virtual-Communities-Cogntiive-Emotional-and- Social-Influences.pdf. asp (12.02.2018)
75. Unsworth, K. L., Dmitrieva, A. ve Adriasola, E. (2013). Changing Behaviour: Increasing the Effectiveness of Workplace Interventions İn Creating Pro- Environmental Behaviour Change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2): 211-229. Doi: 10.1002/job.1837
76. Verplanken, B. ve Orbell, S. (2003). Reflections on Past Behavior: A Self-Report Index of Habit Strength. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(6): 1313-1330. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01951.x
77. Vicente-Molina, M. A., Fernández-Sáinz, A. ve Izagirre-Olaizola, J. (2013). Environmental Knowledge and Other Variables Affecting Pro- Environmental Behaviour: Comparison of University Students from Emerging and Advanced Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 61, 130-138. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.015
78. Wood, W., Tam, L. ve Witt, M. G. (2005). Changing Circumstances, Disrupting Habits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6): 918-933. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.918
79. Young, W., Hwang, K., McDonald, S. ve Oates, C. J. (2010). Sustainable Consumption: Green Consumer Behaviour When Purchasing Products. Sustainable Development, 18(1): 20-31.doi: 10.1002/sd.394
80. Zhao, H. H., Gao, Q., Wu, Y. P., Wang, Y. ve Zhu, X. D. (2014). What Affects Green Consumer Behavior in China? A Case Study from Qingdao. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.021