Research Article

Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height

Volume: 14 Number: 3 December 29, 2023
EN

Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height

Abstract

This study aimed to compare force plate, motion analysis, and mobile application methods for calculating vertical jump height. Twenty-nine male college students (age: 22.4 ± 1.0 years; height: 178.1 ± 6.2cm; body weight: 71.2 ± 8.0 kg) voluntarily participated in the study. Two countermovement jumps (CMJ) with 1-minute intervals on a force platform (BERTEC 4060-10) were performed. The countermovement jump performances were captured using an iPhone 11 (Apple Inc., USA). The experimental setup involved using three high-speed cameras, specifically the My Jump 2 and SIMI Motion 7.5. Obtained results from hip displacement (HD) data with motion analysis system showed that participants had significantly lower vertical jump height calculated from motion capture (p = 0.01; -8.3 ± 3.86, 95%CI; MyJump2-SIMI_HD = 1.24/3.30). It was also found that calculations from left and right foot displacement were higher than My Jump 2 results (95%CI; MyJump2-SIMI_RF = 0.66/2.93) and 95%CI (MyJump2-SIMI_LF) = (-0.63/2.65). In contrast, force plate calculations, known as the gold standard in the literature, were very similar to My Jump (95%CI; MyJumpII-FP) = (2.38/4.01). The findings indicate that the My Jump 2, used for assessing vertical jump height, may be a reliable alternative for determining vertical jump height instead of setting up gold standard methods. Individuals' athletic performance abilities and birth, gender, and sports preferences should be considered. Finally, when coaches or sports scientists intend to measure CMJ, My Jump 2 application can be recommended as a laboratory application as well as a practical and valid measurement method, especially for field applications.

Keywords

References

  1. Atkinson, G., & Nevill, A. M. (1998). Statistical Methods For Assessing Measurement Error (Reliability) in Variables Relevant to Sports Medicine. Sports Medicine, 26(4), 217–238. https://doi.org/10.2165/00007256-199826040-00002
  2. Balsalobre-Fernández, C., Glaister, M., & Lockey, R. A. (2015). The validity and reliability of an iPhone app for measuring vertical jump performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(15), 1574–1579. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2014.996184
  3. Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204
  4. Bosco, C., P., L., & Komi, P. . (1983). A simple method for measurement of mechanical power in jumping. Europ. J. Appl. Physiol, 50, 273–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00422166
  5. Castagna, C., Ganzetti, M., Ditroilo, M., Giovannelli, M., Rocchetti, A., & Manzi, V. (2013). Concurrent Valıdıty Of Vertıcal Jump Performance Assessment Systems. www.nsca.com
  6. Chiu, L. Z. F., & Dæhlin, T. E. (2020). Comparing Numerical Methods to Estimate Vertical Jump Height Using a Force Platform. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 24(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2019.1650044
  7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillside. In NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates (pp. 278–280). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.ep10768783
  8. Cronin, J. B., Hing, R. D., & Mcnair, P. J. (2004). Relıabılıty and valıdıty of a lınear posıtıon transducer for measurıng jump performance. In Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (Vol. 18, Issue 3). http://journals.lww.com/nsca-jscr

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Biomechanics in Sports Science

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

December 29, 2023

Submission Date

July 25, 2023

Acceptance Date

October 26, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 14 Number: 3

APA
Köklü, Ö., Alptekin, A., & Korkmaz, H. (2023). Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, 14(3), 408-418. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1332607
AMA
1.Köklü Ö, Alptekin A, Korkmaz H. Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height. Pamukkale J Sport Sci. 2023;14(3):408-418. doi:10.54141/psbd.1332607
Chicago
Köklü, Özlem, Ahmet Alptekin, and Halil Korkmaz. 2023. “Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height”. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences 14 (3): 408-18. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1332607.
EndNote
Köklü Ö, Alptekin A, Korkmaz H (December 1, 2023) Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences 14 3 408–418.
IEEE
[1]Ö. Köklü, A. Alptekin, and H. Korkmaz, “Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height”, Pamukkale J Sport Sci, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 408–418, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.54141/psbd.1332607.
ISNAD
Köklü, Özlem - Alptekin, Ahmet - Korkmaz, Halil. “Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height”. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences 14/3 (December 1, 2023): 408-418. https://doi.org/10.54141/psbd.1332607.
JAMA
1.Köklü Ö, Alptekin A, Korkmaz H. Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height. Pamukkale J Sport Sci. 2023;14:408–418.
MLA
Köklü, Özlem, et al. “Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height”. Pamukkale Journal of Sport Sciences, vol. 14, no. 3, Dec. 2023, pp. 408-1, doi:10.54141/psbd.1332607.
Vancouver
1.Özlem Köklü, Ahmet Alptekin, Halil Korkmaz. Comparison of Various Devices Used in the Evaluation of Vertical Jump Height. Pamukkale J Sport Sci. 2023 Dec. 1;14(3):408-1. doi:10.54141/psbd.1332607

Cited By